--- Comment #15 from zaks at il dot ibm dot com 2008-02-08 08:49 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I think this is a dup of another bug I filed with respect of the builtin
> > operator new that getting the malloc attribute.
> Are you referi
--- Comment #56 from zaks at il dot ibm dot com 2007-01-15 07:19 ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> Created an attachment (id=12879)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12879&action=view) [edit]
> Patch for scheduler dependency lists.
Looks like a pretty good
--- Comment #58 from zaks at il dot ibm dot com 2007-01-15 15:30 ---
(In reply to comment #57)
> Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] A file that can not be
> compiled in reasonable time/space
> Thanks! Very useful comments. I'm continuing to work on cleaning the
> pat
