[Bug tree-optimization/50183] ICE in verify_ssa for 416.gamess when optimizing using profile data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50557] [4.7 Regression] Register pressure increase after reassociation (x86, 32 bits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2011-09-30 14:30:56 UTC --- Reassociation isn't doing anything untoward here that raises register pressure. The problem must be occurring downstream. Likely the scheduler is making a different decision tha

[Bug tree-optimization/50557] [4.7 Regression] Register pressure increase after reassociation (x86, 32 bits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2011-10-10 12:40:01 UTC --- I don't have anything too helpful to add. This code as it stands is balanced on a knife's edge for register usage for the particular target, so it's always going to be sensitive

[Bug middle-end/44382] Slow integer multiply

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382 --- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2011-10-13 17:30:14 UTC --- Just adding some status information well after the fact... We experimented with adding powerpc64 hooks to use the parallel reassociation support from comment #8. We elected not

[Bug middle-end/44382] Slow integer multiply

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt 2011-10-21 14:41:13 UTC --- One more data point. I repeated the experiment using -fsched-pressure. Although this reduced the degradations considerably, the overall results are equivocal. I see a few impr

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/41743] Missing loop optimisation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41743 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/53106] [4.8 Regression] Benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53106 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-03 15:16:39 UTC --- FWIW, I verified that Honza's proposed patch fixes the build problems for 483.xlancbmk and 32-bit 447.dealII on powerpc-linux. Any ETA for getting this committed? Thanks, Bill

[Bug middle-end/53217] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/53217] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/53217] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-16 14:39:40 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed May 16 14:39:32 2012 New Revision: 187595 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187595 Log: gcc: 2012-05-16 Bill Schmidt PR tr

[Bug tree-optimization/53217] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53385] New: "Error: operand out of range" after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 Bug #: 53385 Summary: "Error: operand out of range" after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/53388] New: Removal of build_min_nt breaks bootstrap for objc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53388 Bug #: 53388 Summary: Removal of build_min_nt breaks bootstrap for objc++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/53385] [4.8 Regression] "Error: operand out of range" after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-18 03:42:46 UTC --- I suspect you're right. I'll have a look at it tomorrow.

[Bug target/53385] [4.8 Regression] "Error: operand out of range" after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 --- Comment #12 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-18 14:05:06 UTC --- Created attachment 27433 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27433 Tentative patch Tentative patch following Jakub's suggestion. This fixes bootstrap. Pending

[Bug target/53385] [4.8 Regression] "Error: operand out of range" after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-21 15:17:49 UTC --- Created attachment 27462 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27462 Unreduced testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-21 15:21:19 UTC --- Whoops, left off the compile command: g++ -o YarrPattern.o -S -O3 ./YarrPattern.ii

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] New: [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 Bug #: 53438 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-22 13:13:04 UTC --- Yep, I'll check it out. Thanks, Richard!

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-22 18:04:21 UTC --- Richard, the patch looks good. It fixed the reduced test case, solves the customer problem, and bootstraps on powerpc64-linux with no regressions.

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-23 12:35:11 UTC --- Sure. My testing was on 4.7, so I'll sanity-test trunk first. I can commit the backport next week also, assuming no fallout between now and then.

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #12 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-23 17:38:44 UTC --- Hm, the auto-commenter isn't working. Committed to trunk: 2012-05-23 Richard Guenther PR tree-optimization/53438 * tree-sra.c (analyze_access_subtree): Correct bitf

[Bug target/53385] [4.8 Regression] "Error: operand out of range" after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 --- Comment #14 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-24 13:53:03 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu May 24 13:52:56 2012 New Revision: 187834 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187834 Log: 2012-05-24 Bill Schmidt Backport f

[Bug target/53385] [4.8 Regression] "Error: operand out of range" after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 --- Comment #14 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-24 13:53:03 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu May 24 13:52:56 2012 New Revision: 187834 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187834 Log: 2012-05-24 Bill Schmidt Backport f

[Bug target/53385] [4.8 Regression] "Error: operand out of range" after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 --- Comment #15 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-24 13:54:24 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu May 24 13:54:16 2012 New Revision: 187835 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187835 Log: 2012-05-24 Bill Schmidt Backport f

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #14 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-25 15:37:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > It didn't work because you've used the patch as svn commit message instead of > ChangeLog entry. Whoops, found a new kind of mistake to make. :) > A

[Bug rtl-optimization/53487] New: [4.8 Regression] Unrecognizable insn for conditional move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53487 Bug #: 53487 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Unrecognizable insn for conditional move Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53487] [4.8 Regression] Unrecognizable insn for conditional move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53487 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone

[Bug rtl-optimization/53487] [4.8 Regression] Unrecognizable insn for conditional move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53487 --- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-25 16:09:43 UTC --- Dumps show that the ICE occurs in the first pass following expand.

[Bug rtl-optimization/53487] [4.8 Regression] Unrecognizable insn for conditional move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53487 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27496|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #15 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-28 13:58:30 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon May 28 13:58:18 2012 New Revision: 187930 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187930 Log: 2012-05-28 Bill Schmidt Backport f

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #19 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-28 22:31:40 UTC --- Excellent. Thanks, Jakub.

[Bug middle-end/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target --- Comment #4 from William J

[Bug target/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-12 19:09:48 UTC --- If this is incorrect, and zero is supposed to indicate a cacheless memory (do they exist anymore?), then I can disable the adjacent-loads hoisting optimization for that case. Som

[Bug target/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647 --- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-12 19:45:56 UTC --- Alternative patch with the same functionality: --cut here-- Index: tree-ssa-phiopt.c === --- tree-ssa-phiopt.c (revisio

[Bug tree-optimization/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

||2012-06-12 Component|target |tree-optimization AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #10 from

[Bug tree-optimization/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647 --- Comment #11 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-13 12:34:02 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Jun 13 12:33:55 2012 New Revision: 188509 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188509 Log: 2012-06-13 Bill Schmidt PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53703] [4.8 Regression] verify_ssa: definition in block 105 does not dominate use in block 103

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53703 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from William

[Bug tree-optimization/53703] [4.8 Regression] verify_ssa: definition in block 105 does not dominate use in block 103

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53703 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-18 12:22:40 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Jun 18 12:22:37 2012 New Revision: 188731 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188731 Log: gcc: 2012-06-18 Bill Schmidt PR tr

[Bug tree-optimization/53703] [4.8 Regression] verify_ssa: definition in block 105 does not dominate use in block 103

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53703 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53703] [4.8 Regression] verify_ssa: definition in block 105 does not dominate use in block 103

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53703 --- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-20 14:30:47 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Jun 20 14:30:39 2012 New Revision: 188835 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188835 Log: gcc: 2012-06-20 Bill Schmidt PR tr

[Bug tree-optimization/53703] [4.8 Regression] verify_ssa: definition in block 105 does not dominate use in block 103

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53703 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-20 14:34:15 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Jun 20 14:34:08 2012 New Revision: 188836 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188836 Log: gcc: 2012-06-20 Bill Schmidt PR tr

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] New: Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 Bug #: 53773 Summary: Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] New: Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 Bug #: 53774 Summary: Reassociator generates non-canonical addition Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug bootstrap/53779] New: Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 Bug #: 53779 Summary: Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/53779] Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug bootstrap/53779] Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-26 18:42:41 UTC --- I wonder why fp_6(D) gets a rank of zero. Is it an uninitialized variable or a parameter? Parms are supposed to get small positive numbers for ranks. Maybe the "right" fix is t

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-26 18:52:44 UTC --- Yeah, looking at the test case it's an uninitialized variable. Seems like a hole in the ranking system that it gets a rank of zero. I think a default value that isn't a parm sho

[Bug tree-optimization/32120] missed PRE/FRE of a*2+4 and (a+2)*2

||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #12 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-27 21:47:49 UTC --- Fixed by the new strength reduction pass.

[Bug tree-optimization/22586] GVN-PRE could do strength reduction

||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-28 01:27:43 UTC --- This specific case is handled by the new strength reduction pass. Some more complex scenarios will be added later.

[Bug middle-end/35308] Straight line strength reduction

||missed-optimization Last reconfirmed||2012-06-28 CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/46556] Code size regression in struct access

Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/53955] [4.8 Regression] Missing prototypes in i386.c, bootstrap failure with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt 2012-07-13 21:01:53 UTC --- Confirmed on rs6000 as well. I'll have a look. Thanks for the heads-up, Steven!

[Bug bootstrap/53955] [4.8 Regression] Missing prototypes in i386.c, bootstrap failure with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53955 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2012-07-13 22:33:36 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Jul 13 22:33:31 2012 New Revision: 189473 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189473 Log: 2012-07-13 Bill Schmidt PR bootstra

[Bug bootstrap/53955] [4.8 Regression] Missing prototypes in i386.c, bootstrap failure with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53955 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug regression/54084] Bunch of fails for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54084 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-07-27 16:26:47 UTC --- Operand swapping is also done in vect_is_slp_reduction. Places that rely on the reduction operand being the last operand: * vect_model_reduction_cost * vectorizable_reduction

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2012-07-31 12:25:10 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Jul 31 12:25:04 2012 New Revision: 190007 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190007 Log: gcc: 2012-07-31 Bill Schmidt PR tr

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46556] Code size regression in struct access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46556 --- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-01 13:02:46 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Aug 1 13:02:38 2012 New Revision: 190037 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190037 Log: gcc: PR tree-optimization/46556 *

[Bug tree-optimization/46556] Code size regression in struct access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46556 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46556] Code size regression in struct access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46556 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46556] Code size regression in struct access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46556 --- Comment #12 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-01 18:42:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Fixed. > > Is it still your plan to also do something with the patch to expose target > addressing modes earlier? No,

[Bug target/54156] [4.8 Regression] New fail on AVX target: gcc.dg/vect/pr53773.c. 190010 vs revision 189996

||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-03 14:35:51 UTC --- OK. I hate that the vect tests turn on details by

[Bug target/54156] [4.8 Regression] New fail on AVX target: gcc.dg/vect/pr53773.c. 190010 vs revision 189996

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-03 16:12:34 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Aug 3 16:12:22 2012 New Revision: 190131 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190131 Log: 2012-08-03 Bill Schmidt PR target/5

[Bug target/54156] [4.8 Regression] New fail on AVX target: gcc.dg/vect/pr53773.c. 190010 vs revision 189996

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-03 16:12:34 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Aug 3 16:12:22 2012 New Revision: 190131 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190131 Log: 2012-08-03 Bill Schmidt PR target/5

[Bug target/54156] [4.8 Regression] New fail on AVX target: gcc.dg/vect/pr53773.c. 190010 vs revision 189996

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156 --- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-03 16:14:05 UTC --- Yukhin, could you please verify this removes the failure for your target? Thanks, Bill

[Bug target/54156] [4.8 Regression] New fail on AVX target: gcc.dg/vect/pr53773.c. 190010 vs revision 189996

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50969] 17% degradation in 168.wupwise for interleave via permutation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-06 21:39:38 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Feb 6 21:39:34 2012 New Revision: 183944 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183944 Log: 2012-02-06 Bill Schmidt PR tree-opt

[Bug tree-optimization/50969] 17% degradation in 168.wupwise for interleave via permutation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-10 16:38:44 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Feb 10 16:38:37 2012 New Revision: 184102 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184102 Log: 2012-02-10 Bill Schmidt Ira Rose

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-13 18:25:36 UTC --- Just a quick note about the patch that was committed last week. For 4.6 and 4.7, this approach adjusts the cost model for vector permutes with TARGET_VSX, making them appear more

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 --- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-14 19:40:23 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:13 2012 New Revision: 184225 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184225 Log: 2012-02-14 Bill Schmidt Ira Rosen

[Bug tree-optimization/50969] 17% degradation in 168.wupwise for interleave via permutation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-14 19:40:22 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:13 2012 New Revision: 184225 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184225 Log: 2012-02-14 Bill Schmidt Ira Rosen

[Bug tree-optimization/52424] New: dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424 Bug #: 52424 Summary: dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/52424] dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-29 13:06:40 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Feb 29 13:06:28 2012 New Revision: 184662 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184662 Log: 2012-02-29 Bill Schmidt PR tree-opt

[Bug tree-optimization/52424] dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/52424] dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424 --- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-29 20:26:33 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Feb 29 20:26:29 2012 New Revision: 184670 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184670 Log: 2012-02-29 Bill Schmidt PR tree-opt

[Bug tree-optimization/52424] dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-29 20:27:45 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Feb 29 20:27:41 2012 New Revision: 184671 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184671 Log: 2012-02-29 Bill Schmidt PR tree-opt

[Bug tree-optimization/52424] dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424 --- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-29 22:19:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > I think this is related to PR 45685. On the surface this looked like a good possibility. However, I just tried compiling the code from that PR on powe

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-02 14:52:09 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Mar 2 14:51:58 2012 New Revision: 184787 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184787 Log: 2012-03-02 Bill Schmidt Ira Rosen

[Bug tree-optimization/50969] 17% degradation in 168.wupwise for interleave via permutation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969 --- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-02 14:52:09 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Mar 2 14:51:58 2012 New Revision: 184787 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184787 Log: 2012-03-02 Bill Schmidt Ira Rosen

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 --- Comment #16 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-12 12:37:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > I see this test failing on powerpc-apple-darwin8 (32b G4, ppc7400): > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01296.html > Is this specific t

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 --- Comment #17 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-12 18:26:52 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Mar 12 18:26:48 2012 New Revision: 185260 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185260 Log: 2012-03-12 Bill Schmidt PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 --- Comment #18 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-12 19:45:49 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Mar 12 19:45:43 2012 New Revision: 185265 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185265 Log: 2012-03-12 Bill Schmidt PR tree-op

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

, ||pthaugen at gcc dot ||gnu.org, wschmidt at gcc ||dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-19 18:58:44 UTC --- I was about to open a PR on this

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-21 18:34:55 UTC --- I would be willing to commit the patches once they're approved. Let me know.

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-28 16:28:42 UTC --- Dominique, can you please post your patches out on the gcc-patches mailing list so they can be approved? Again, I'm happy to commit them once they've met approval by the maintain

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt 2012-04-05 12:11:58 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu Apr 5 12:11:50 2012 New Revision: 186163 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186163 Log: gcc/testsuite: 2012-04-05 Bill Schmidt

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >