oduct: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: wrobell at pld-linux dot org
GCC build triplet: ppc-pld-linux-gcc
GCC host triplet: ppc-pld-linux-g
--- Comment #1 from wrobell at pld-linux dot org 2008-08-18 21:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=16088)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16088&action=view)
gsignal.i file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37154
--- Comment #2 from wrobell at pld-linux dot org 2008-08-18 21:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=16089)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16089&action=view)
gsignal.s file created by gcc before 'inline' keyword removal
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--- Comment #3 from wrobell at pld-linux dot org 2008-08-18 21:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=16090)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16090&action=view)
gsignal.s file after 'inline' keyword removal
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37154
--- Comment #5 from wrobell at pld-linux dot org 2008-08-18 22:40 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> >gdb claims that problem is at line 2285, variable "accumulator" is 0x0,
>
> well with optimization, debugging info is not always fully correct.
>
i've chan
