--- Comment #5 from wilson at specifix dot com 2006-06-09 00:17 ---
Subject: Re: Problem: gcc 4.0.3 on Unix_SV
mirko dot bruzzone at primeur dot com wrote:
> gt-c-pragma.h:46: parse error before `__attribute__'
gt-c-pragma.h uses attribute unused in a parameter list, be
--- Comment #5 from wilson at specifix dot com 2005-11-09 00:34 ---
Subject: Re: Shared libgcc not used for linking by default
sje at cup dot hp dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #3 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-11-08 21:22 ---
> I am not convinced that this is a bug.
--- Comment #17 from wilson at specifix dot com 2005-11-09 02:06 ---
Subject: Re: New: gfortran - fails to build on Mac OSX
-10.4.3
dir at lanl dot gov wrote:
> strip -o libgcc_s.10.4.dylib_T${mlib} \
> -s ../.././gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-libgcc.10.4.ver -c -u \
>
--- Comment #7 from wilson at specifix dot com 2005-12-06 03:03 ---
Subject: Re: New: [2.95.2/3.3.3/4.0.0 Regression] g++ fails
to emit debug information for SOME local variables in class member function
that has templated local variables
schaudhu at blackrock dot com wrote:
> W
--- Comment #3 from wilson at specifix dot com 2005-12-06 05:15 ---
Subject: Re: gcc fails to compile for target h8300-hitachi-hms
with unrecognizable insn
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 04
--- Comment #2 from wilson at specifix dot com 2006-08-04 01:34 ---
Subject: Re: make of gcc-4.1.1 failed using icc v9.1.042
on ia64
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 20:13
> ---
> If not, then wh
--- Comment #10 from wilson at specifix dot com 2006-08-22 01:37 ---
Subject: Re: New: __builtin_nan() and __builtin_unordered()
inconsistent
iano at apple dot com wrote:
> Cloning due to closed minded bug screener:
> ^^^
>
--- Comment #11 from wilson at specifix dot com 2006-08-23 21:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns,
at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Any update on this, Jim?
No. My life continues to be busy and complicated, making
--- Comment #13 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-09-11 22:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC
CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 12:05 +, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> So, what can be done to speed up acceptance
--- Comment #14 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-09-11 22:32 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC
CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 09:44 +, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I have bootstrapped/regtested the
>
--- Comment #21 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-09-12 19:30 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128239
causes libgomp failure
The failure occurs in the sdse (simple dead store elimination) pass.
It looks like it is confused by an extended asm statement with
input
--- Comment #22 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-09-12 23:35 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128239
causes libgomp failure
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> No matter whether it is right or wrong in tree-ssa-operands.c, I think
> sdse should just avoid re
--- Comment #6 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-10-08 22:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE in bitfield_overlaps_p,
at tree-sra.c:2901
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> This patch doesn't work on Linux/ia64. I got
IA-64 is using a TImode bitsizetype because it
--- Comment #5 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-10-17 20:53 ---
Subject: Re: valgrind error with -O2 for linux
kernel code
bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-17 04:46
> ---
> Although valgrind i
--- Comment #4 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-07-02 18:34 ---
Subject: Re: Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark
fma3d and applu
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 02:10 +, zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
> and then define ARCH_DOES_NOT_USE_DWARF2 in the right place in
--- Comment #6 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-07-02 20:30 ---
Subject: Re: Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark
fma3d and applu
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 19:12 +, zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
wrote:
> Lets see if an arm person is willing to talk about this.
--- Comment #9 from wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-11 06:20 ---
Or maybe I will look at it later tonight.
The problem seems to be that we have no code that will make a jump insn
dependent on the previous jump insn when we are scheduling a region that
contains multiple basic blocks
--- Comment #10 from wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-11 06:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=9960)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9960&action=view)
trivial hack to make the reduced testcase work
Actually, come to think of it, other targets don't use s
--- Comment #3 from wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-19 19:48 ---
Subject: Re: New: ARM cross compile build fails with
assembler errors in crtstuff.c
newell at cei dot net wrote:
> Configured with: ../gcc-4.1-20050515/configure --target=arm-elf
> --prefix=/home/newell/xgcc
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-07-08 00:08
---
Subject: Re: Scheduler overly conservative in
sched-deps
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> /tmp/ccBDW5xy.s:186: Warning: Additional NOP may be necessary to workaround
> Itanium processor A/
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-07-08 00:41
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Casts in folding
*& omitted
gcc2eran at tromer dot org wrote:
> And here is what N1124 [6.3.2.1/1] says:
> "When an object is said to have a particular ty
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-07-08 00:46
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for
uninitialized variables
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-05 16:56
> ---
> Pa
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-08-12 19:07
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] g++ crash with
-O2 and -O3 on input file
phython at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-12
>
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-08-16 00:47
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Compiling of large
array fails
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25
> 15:50 ---
--- Comment #3 from wilson at specifix dot com 2007-11-15 01:41 ---
Subject: Re: Random number generates the same set of numbers
rsanghavi at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from rsanghavi at gmail dot com 2007-11-14 22:32 ---
> But, even if you seed it, the res
--- Comment #27 from wilson at specifix dot com 2006-03-09 22:21 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Build failure: undefined
symbol __floatunsitf
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Adding the maintainers of all those in Cc list. I don't know what
> US_SOFTWARE_GOFAS
26 matches
Mail list logo
