https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco.dijkstra at arm dot com
--- Comment #41
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #42 from Wilco ---
Cut down example:
typedef struct { int x, y; } X;
void f (X *p, int n)
{
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{ p[i].x = i;
p[i].y = i + 1;
}
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #47 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #46)
> Wonder if that:
> vect_array.11[0] = vect_vec_iv_.7_45;
> vect_array.11[1] = vect__4.8_48;
> on armeb shouldn't have been [1] and [0] instead, otherwise we end up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84114
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco.dijkstra at arm dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #49 from Wilco ---
AArch64 does this:
(define_expand "vec_store_lanesoi"
[(set (match_operand:OI 0 "aarch64_simd_struct_operand" "=Utv")
(unspec:OI [(match_operand:OI 1 "register_operand" "w")
(unspec:VQ
