https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119021
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> So, either remove that call too, or move it into lra_asm_insn_error before
> the insn has been deleted. Vlad, I'll defer this to you.
Sorry for the issues w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119021
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Can't it just look at the present insn and if it is no longer asm but
> NOTE_INSN_DELETED, ignore it?
RA keep erroneous asm goto (for keeping CFG correctnes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103616
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I looked at the generated code and I see only one issue with func foo:
void foo (void)
{
double d = 0.0, e = 7.8;
__asm ("# %0 %1" : : "m" (d), "m" (e));
}
for which GCC generates:
movq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Created attachment 61535
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61535&action=edit
A candidate patch for gcc-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> r14-7141-ga729b6e002fe76208f33fdcdee49d6a310a1940e fixed it.
The patch needed some reworking for gcc-13 as there were changes in the same
code parts.
I am
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #13)
> I am putting a candidate patch in the attachment. I'll approve it after
> finishing tests and bootstraps on amd64, arm64, ppc64.
The patch testing seem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I think we should revert the patch for PR99015 I committed yesterday. There
were to many changes in this part of LRA since gcc-13 and many of them were
interdependent. It will be difficult to find all n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've remembered that the patch for PR112918 triggered a hidden bug on mips. So
I added code fixing this bug too to this PR patch.
The new patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on amd64, arm64,
201 - 208 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
