[Bug libstdc++/114147] New: tuple allocator-extended constructor requires non-explicit default constructor

2024-02-28 Thread victor.dyachenko at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114147 Bug ID: 114147 Summary: tuple allocator-extended constructor requires non-explicit default constructor Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug libstdc++/114147] tuple allocator-extended constructor requires non-explicit default constructor

2024-02-28 Thread victor.dyachenko at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114147 --- Comment #1 from __vic --- Why _ImplicitDefaultCtor is required here? template::value, _T1, _T2> = true> _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR tuple(allocator_arg_t __tag, const _Alloc& __a) : _Inherited(__tag, __a) { } Missing

[Bug libstdc++/114147] tuple allocator-extended constructor requires non-explicit default constructor

2024-02-28 Thread victor.dyachenko at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114147 --- Comment #2 from __vic --- Shouldn't this be added? template::value, _T1, _T2> = true> explicit _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR tuple(allocator_arg_t __tag, const _Alloc& __a) : _Inherited(__tag, __a) { }

[Bug libstdc++/114147] [11/12/13 Regression] tuple allocator-extended constructor requires non-explicit default constructor

2024-02-28 Thread victor.dyachenko at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114147 --- Comment #4 from __vic --- The latest gcc-14-20240225 snapshot doesn't include this fix. Is there any chance to have this fixed in 14.1 release?