https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71952
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, patch submitted as r240231 although it doesn't show here. Waiting one
week for regressions before closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71952
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
--- Comment #1 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi David,
what SW did you use to find this?
#1, #2, #4 are covered by a patch I am doing at the moment.
I believe that the report for #3 is at least misleading. Because when the
associated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 1 14:00:57 2016
New Revision: 240695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-01 Andre Veh
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39737
--> https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That's what library version numbering was made, wasn't it? I.e., this is the
way to go IMO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72832
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Thu Oct 13 08:51:21 2016
New Revision: 241088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-09-01 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72832
--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week before backporting to gcc-6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77961
--- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is no regression, because before the patch mentioned in comment #1, the
construct of having allocatable components in derived types was flagged as
error. Now this construct is supported for
MED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39852
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39852&action=edit
Testprogr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78053
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Severity|minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78053
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The ICE happens because the FE introduces a type that ends up not being
> gimplified via gimplify-type-sizes:
>
> char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78053
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61376
--- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51864
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117
--- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61337
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #18 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 22 12:33:38 2016
New Revision: 241439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-22 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72832
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72832
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72832
--- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Oct 23 11:55:44 2016
New Revision: 241448
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241448&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-10-23 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78053
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51864
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #16 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61376
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61337
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Oct 25 17:01:58 2016
New Revision: 241528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241528&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-25 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 39933
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39933&action=edit
Fix the ICE
The patch fixes the ICE. Albeit I am not happy with it. I fear it is too short
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72832
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51864
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61337
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61376
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Steve,
you asked what other compilers have to say to the code (the one in the
description).
Ifort:
> ifort bug.f90 -o bug -coarray
bug.f90: catastrophic error: **Internal compiler er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 43366, which changed state.
Bug 43366 Summary: [OOP][F08] Intrinsic assign to polymorphic variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500
--- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, the change introduced by r241885 is quite complicated. It may cause major
regressions. I don't recommend backporting it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78356
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78356
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fix at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-11/msg00140.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78356
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Nov 16 13:45:29 2016
New Revision: 242490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-11-16 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78356
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78395
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #2)
> (In reply to janus from comment #1)
> > gfortran 6.2.0 says:
> >
> >v6 = 3 * v4%get_t2() ! This line is the one which causes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78395
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78395
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Nov 20 14:21:43 2016
New Revision: 242637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-11-20 Andre Veh
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The testcase in gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/poly_run_2.f90 gives explicit
cobounds for the argument A to procedure s(). Those are not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78466
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78466
--- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another issue I noticed is that with -O2 the code
allocate (A[1:4,-5:*])
if (.not. allocated(A)) error stop
stops instead of continuing like it does with all other levels of optimization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51550
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63230
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64787
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63230
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fix available with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00074.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00075.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00085.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Completely right, the initial test is still not compilable. But this is because
assigning to an allocatable component in an initializer is not allowed by the
standards:
F2003, 7.1.7 (3) and also in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
First sentence of F2008, 7.1.12 is:
A constant expression is an expression with limitations that make it
suitable for use as a kind type parameter, *initializer*, or named
constant. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Mar 23 11:58:49 2015
New Revision: 221591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
2015-03-23 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64787
--- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Mar 24 10:28:48 2015
New Revision: 221621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
2015-03-24 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63230
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Mar 24 10:28:48 2015
New Revision: 221621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
2015-03-24 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Mar 24 10:28:48 2015
New Revision: 221621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
2015-03-24 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
--- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Mar 24 11:47:45 2015
New Revision: 221627
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221627&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-24 Andre Vehreschild
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63230
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64787
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44672
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44672
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45440
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57307
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Apr 7 14:10:43 2015
New Revision: 221897
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221897&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/65548
* gfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35318
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35318&action=edit
Follow-up patch fixing latest regression.
The attached patch fixes the ICE.
Juergen, pleas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That patch is relative to current trunk, meaning 6.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54714
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #16 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60322
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Thu Apr 23 11:32:00 2015
New Revision: 222361
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222361&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-23 Andre Veh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #20 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754
Bug 58754 depends on bug 57456, which changed state.
Bug 57456 Summary: [OOP] CLASS + CHARACTER ALLOCATE with typespec: For arrays,
the typespec is ignored
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976
Bug 51976 depends on bug 57456, which changed state.
Bug 57456 Summary: [OOP] CLASS + CHARACTER ALLOCATE with typespec: For arrays,
the typespec is ignored
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35407
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35407&action=edit
A first patch.
With the attached patch your small test case and the testsuite runs w/o
segfa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #17 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Apr 27 17:34:11 2015
New Revision: 222477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222477&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran
2015-04-27 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65841
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Apr 27 17:34:11 2015
New Revision: 222477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222477&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran
2015-04-27 Andre Vehreschild
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60322
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Apr 27 17:41:01 2015
New Revision: 222478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-27 Andre Vehreschild
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35318|0 |1
is obsolete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #31 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #33 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can only work on the issue, not do magic.
When you have issues with svn checkout try the gitmirror:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GitMirror
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64674
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC
201 - 300 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
