https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104892
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks -- I'm confirming:
PASS: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c (test for excess
errors)
[-XFAIL:-]{+PASS:+} libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c
execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105001
Bug ID: 105001
Summary: If executing with non-nvptx offloading, but nvptx
offloading compilation is enabled: FAIL:
libgomp.c/pr104783.c execution test
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101484
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104088
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105042
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93260
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105421
Bug ID: 105421
Summary: GCN offloading, raised '-mgang-private-size':
'HSA_STATUS_ERROR_MEMORY_APERTURE_VIOLATION'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105018
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/MentorEm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101544
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101544
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Schwinge ---
One concrete question, on example of:
(In reply to myself from comment #8)
> hard-code '-foffload-options=nvptx-none=-mptx=6.3\ -malias' to work around
> GCC PR105018 "[nvptx] Need better alias support"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106208
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445
Bug ID: 106445
Summary: nvptx offloading: C++ constructor symbol alias getting
lost
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp, wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106447
Bug ID: 106447
Summary: nvptx offloading: C++ '__iterator_category' 'return'
ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102310
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I found that the '-O2' ICE 'during IPA pass: cp' originally reported here as
well as the '-O0' ICE 'during RTL pass: expand' do disappear with Julian's
recent r13-2665-g23baa717c991d77f206a9358ce2c04960ccf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107041
Bug ID: 107041
Summary: [13 Regression] C '-Wenum-int-mismatch' diagnostic for
OpenACC 'acc_on_device'
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107026
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107026
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95550
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107227
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107227
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Spencer Bryngelson from comment #0)
> 5 | !$acc parallel loop private(arr(1:10))
> |1
> Error: Syntax error in OpenMP variable list at (1)
That's bec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107231
Bug ID: 107231
Summary: [13 Regression] c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-loop-g.c:
'-fcompare-debug' failure (length)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32927
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Last re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100400
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #8)
> Any chance we can get r13-262-gda6305558bab9e24943848e4fc5bd8738d7e8f9b
> backported to gcc 12? kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c still fails there
Now done, and so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107342
Bug ID: 107342
Summary: Optimization opportunity where integer '/' corresponds
to '>>'
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107344
Bug ID: 107344
Summary: GCC/nvptx SESE region optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107344
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105421
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100530
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |debug
Keywords|accepts-inva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
Assignee|tschwinge at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100280
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102330
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101292
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104088
Bug ID: 104088
Summary: [12 Regression] '-O2' (or higher) GCN offloading
(only) 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/vprop.c' excess
errors: 'warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100400
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-05-11 00:00:00 |2022-1-19
Component|tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104132
Bug ID: 104132
Summary: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: internal compiler
error: verify_gimple failed, error: non-register as
LHS of binary operation
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104133
Bug ID: 104133
Summary: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: internal compiler
error: 'verify_gimple' failed, error: invalid operands
in binary operation
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
Bug ID: 104345
Summary: nvptx: "regression" after "nvptx: Transition nvptx
backend to STORE_FLAG_VALUE = 1"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104364
Bug ID: 104364
Summary: [12 Regression] OpenMP/nvptx regressions after
"[nvptx] Add some support for .local atomics"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104364
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks for having confirmed my findings and doubts -- seems I did correctly
understand a thing or two. ;-)
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> > .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104132
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102330
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104416
Bug ID: 104416
Summary: 'lto-wrapper' invoking 'mkoffload's with duplicated
command-line options
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 52370
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52370&action=edit
'_muldc3-good.o'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 52371
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52371&action=edit
'_muldc3-bad.o'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 52372
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52372&action=edit
'_muldc3-WIP.o'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge ---
All your three patches combined still doesn't help resolve the problem.
And, what I realized: they don't even change the Nvidia/CUDA Driver reported
"used [...] registers".
Does that mean that the Driver "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Well. Here's another problem.
Re-testing things using a "bad" '__muldc3' from a build with your three patches
applied, I notice that my '_muldc3-WIP.o' "old"/replacement code uses a
'set.u32.leu.f64', 'n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104423
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Schwinge ---
OK! Putting your "nvptx: Add support for 64-bit mul.hi (and other)
instructions" on top, that considerably changes (simplifies!) the generated
'__muldc3' PTX code; the regression disappears. :-)
(I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102330
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Jakub, thanks again for your comments!
I've written down the following while working through the issue. Maybe you'd
like to verify, and maybe it'll useful for someone later (if only my future
self...).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101204
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102856
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103157
Bug ID: 103157
Summary: 'gengtype': 'typedef' causing infinite-recursion code
to be generated
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101204
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79872
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83336
Bug 83336 depends on bug 79872, which changed state.
Bug 79872 Summary: document placeholder %K in gcc-internal-format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79872
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103244
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103397
Bug ID: 103397
Summary: [12 Regression] GCN target '-march=gfx900' libgfortran
build broken
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103244
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Summary|[12 regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102718
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46476
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46476
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92120
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |cltang at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103697
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to paul.luckner from comment #2)
> integer, allocatable :: i(:)
> i = [1]
Is that PR77504?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102189
Bug ID: 102189
Summary: error: unrecognized command-line option '-fno-[...]';
did you mean '-ftree-[...]'?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102192
Bug ID: 102192
Summary: Curious '-O2'-only '-Wmaybe-uninitialized' diagnostics
for 'libgomp.oacc-fortran/routine-10.f90'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102215
Bug ID: 102215
Summary: [GCN offloading] Missing '__atomic_compare_exchange_1'
etc.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101551
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I've noticed that with an offloading-enabled build of GCC we're losing "note:
in expansion of macro '[...]'" diagnostics. (Effectively
'-ftrack-macro-expansion=0'?)
For example, 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-commo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102302
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102310
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102330
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102362
Bug ID: 102362
Summary: 'dump_printf_loc' doesn't work from 'gate' method of a
'gimple_opt_pass'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102362
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Here, to emit 'note: [...]' ('-fopt-info-note') if because of certain input
source code characteristics (derived from
'DECL_ATTRIBUTES(current_function_decl)'), certain code transformations
do/don't need t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102408
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102408
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102424
Bug ID: 102424
Summary: OpenACC 'reduction' with outer 'loop seq', inner 'loop
gang'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102509
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102500
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102500
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
Bug ID: 102544
Summary: GCN offloading not working for
'amdgcn-amd-amdhsa--gfx906:sramecc+:xnack-'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102735
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|xfail |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgomp |testsuite
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106208
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106643
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69090
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89788
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i?86-intelmic |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71324
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Assignee|unassigned
101 - 200 of 611 matches
Mail list logo