[Bug libgomp/98738] task-detach-6.f90 hangs intermittently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgomp/98738] task-detach-6.f90 hangs intermittently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Schwinge --- Ugh. :-( Where are we tracking this, and is anyone working on this? It's clearly not useful to have (nvptx offloading) testing to run into known TIMEOUTs?

[Bug target/99555] New: [OpenMP/nvptx] Execution-time hang for simple nested OpenMP 'target'/'parallel'/'task' constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555 Bug ID: 99555 Summary: [OpenMP/nvptx] Execution-time hang for simple nested OpenMP 'target'/'parallel'/'task' constructs Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/98738] task-detach-6.f90 hangs intermittently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Schwinge --- I've filed PR99555 "[OpenMP/nvptx] Execution-time hang for simple nested OpenMP 'target'/'parallel'/'task' constructs".

[Bug tree-optimization/90591] Avoid unnecessary data transfer out of OMP construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90591 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|sandra at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug target/99932] New: OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932 Bug ID: 99932 Summary: OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/99857] [11 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/declare-variant-1.c (test for excess errors) by r11-7926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99857 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org L

[Bug target/100001] New: [GCN offloading] Occasional C++ 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/static-variable-1.c' execution failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 Bug ID: 11 Summary: [GCN offloading] Occasional C++ 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/static-variable-1.c' execution failure Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug middle-end/84992] [openacc] function static var in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84992 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/OpenACC/

[Bug middle-end/84991] [openacc] Misleading error message for function static var in routine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84991 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug middle-end/90115] OpenACC: predetermined private levels for variables declared in blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90115 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||90114 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwi

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|assemble-failure| Depends on|94278

[Bug target/100181] hot-cold partitioned code doesn't assemble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > (I could not reproduce the LLVM 9 issue in PR94278 back then.) Hmm, but didn't you say in the LLVM issue (liked

[Bug fortran/97390] Error compiling acc data present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/97390] Error compiling acc data present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge --- Thanks for checking/confirming that. Next try: (In reply to afernandez from comment #0) > 6475 | !$acc data present([...]) async(counter+1) > |1 > Error: Unclassifiable O

[Bug fortran/97390] [OpenACC] 'async' clause on 'data' construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/OpenACC/

[Bug target/97436] [nvptx] -m32 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97436 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org Last re

[Bug testsuite/80219] relative line numbers only working if gcc_{error,warning}_prefix defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80219 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug testsuite/85303] [testsuite, libgomp] dg-message not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85303 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/97718] New: [11 regression] Excessive GDB memory usage after GCC "Save some memory at debug stream-in time"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97718 Bug ID: 97718 Summary: [11 regression] Excessive GDB memory usage after GCC "Save some memory at debug stream-in time" Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/97782] New: [Fortran] Confused location information for OpenACC compute constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97782 Bug ID: 97782 Summary: [Fortran] Confused location information for OpenACC compute constructs Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc

[Bug tree-optimization/97623] [9/10/11 Regression] Extremely slow O2 compile (>>O(n^2))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97623 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/97970] New: [11 regression] 'gcc.dg/gomp/pr82374.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 2' for 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97970 Bug ID: 97970 Summary: [11 regression] 'gcc.dg/gomp/pr82374.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 2' for 32-bit x86 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug regression/97981] New: [11 regression] 32-bit x86 'gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c' execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97981 Bug ID: 97981 Summary: [11 regression] 32-bit x86 'gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c' execution test Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/97996] New: [OMP] Missing 'omp_mappable_type' error diagnostic inside C++ template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97996 Bug ID: 97996 Summary: [OMP] Missing 'omp_mappable_type' error diagnostic inside C++ template Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc,

[Bug c++/98006] New: [OpenACC] 'gcc/cp/decl.c:check_goto' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98006 Bug ID: 98006 Summary: [OpenACC] 'gcc/cp/decl.c:check_goto' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'? Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98007] New: [OpenACC] 'gcc/cp/semantics.c:finish_return_stmt' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp' for 'gcc/cp/decl.c:check_omp_return'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98007 Bug ID: 98007 Summary: [OpenACC] 'gcc/cp/semantics.c:finish_return_stmt' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp' for 'gcc/cp/decl.c:check_omp_return'? Pr

[Bug fortran/98009] New: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/match.c:gfc_match_type_spec' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98009 Bug ID: 98009 Summary: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/match.c:gfc_match_type_spec' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'? Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug fortran/98010] New: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/options.c:gfc_post_options' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98010 Bug ID: 98010 Summary: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/options.c:gfc_post_options' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'? Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug fortran/98011] New: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/scanner.c:load_line' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp' (and vice versa?)?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98011 Bug ID: 98011 Summary: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/scanner.c:load_line' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp' (and vice versa?)? Product: gcc Ver

[Bug fortran/98012] New: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/scanner.c:include_line' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98012 Bug ID: 98012 Summary: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/scanner.c:include_line' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'? Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug fortran/98013] New: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:gfc_generate_function_code' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98013 Bug ID: 98013 Summary: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:gfc_generate_function_code' should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to 'flag_openmp'? Produ

[Bug fortran/98014] New: [Fortran OpenACC] Empty '!$acc' continuation line rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98014 Bug ID: 98014 Summary: [Fortran OpenACC] Empty '!$acc' continuation line rejected Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc Sev

[Bug c++/98072] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_omp_var_list_no_open, at cp/parser.c:34843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98072 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/98080] New: Need 'auto_suppress_location_wrappers sentinel' in 'cp_parser_omp_scan_loop_body'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98080 Bug ID: 98080 Summary: Need 'auto_suppress_location_wrappers sentinel' in 'cp_parser_omp_scan_loop_body'? Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyword

[Bug c++/98081] New: Need 'auto_suppress_location_wrappers sentinel' in 'cp_parser_omp_declare_target'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98081 Bug ID: 98081 Summary: Need 'auto_suppress_location_wrappers sentinel' in 'cp_parser_omp_declare_target'? Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyword

[Bug target/98321] New: [nvptx] 'atom.add.f32' for atomic add of 32-bit 'float'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98321 Bug ID: 98321 Summary: [nvptx] 'atom.add.f32' for atomic add of 32-bit 'float' Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug libstdc++/66146] call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/96428] [nvptx] nvptx_gen_shuffle does not handle V2DI mode – Fails with an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96428 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/96519] [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ia64-sync-5.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96519 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kcy at codesourcery dot com

[Bug target/95864] [11 Regression] GCN offloading execution regressions after commit f062c3f11505b70c5275e5bc0e52f3e441f8afbc "amdgcn: Switch to HSACO v3 binary format"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95864 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/90861] OpenACC 'declare' not cleaning up for VLAs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90861 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vries at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/97168] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/diagnostic-test-expressions-1.c, diagnostic-test-paths-2.c, location-overflow-test-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97168 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/98321] [nvptx] 'atom.add.f32' for atomic add of 32-bit 'float'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98321 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- Thanks for having a look. (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1) > Ok, let's first make a runnable test-case: > ... > $ cat src/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c/test.c > [...] > Indeed we see the cas,

[Bug target/98321] [nvptx] 'atom.add.f32' for atomic add of 32-bit 'float'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98321 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #2) > > However, my report was specifically for the nvptx target compiler. Just > > compile with 'nvptx-gcc -fopenacc

[Bug target/97348] [nvptx] Make -misa=sm_35 the default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97348 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/90859] [OMP] Mappings for VLA different depending on 'target { c && { ! lp64 } }'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90859 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/99137] ICE in gimplify_scan_omp_clauses, at gimplify.c:9833

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99137 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|openmp |openacc Target|x86_64-pc-l

[Bug c/99137] ICE in gimplify_scan_omp_clauses, at gimplify.c:9833

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99137 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > ice-on-invalid-code is when an error should be reported and instead of that > the compiler crashes. > ice-on-valid-code is when the code should compile without

[Bug fortran/100276] [12 regression] Many failures after r12-119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100276 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/64763] [OpenACC] !$acc region not implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64763 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/100500] New: ICE with local label in OpenACC 'loop' region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100500 Bug ID: 100500 Summary: ICE with local label in OpenACC 'loop' region Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc Severity: norma

[Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/100655] New: 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 Bug ID: 100655 Summary: 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug target/100657] New: [GCN offloading] 'libgomp.c-c++-common/reduction-6.c' execution times out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100657 Bug ID: 100657 Summary: [GCN offloading] 'libgomp.c-c++-common/reduction-6.c' execution times out Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: open

[Bug middle-end/100669] [OpenACC] ICE with array-reduction variable & related issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100669 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-19 Keywords|ice-on-

[Bug target/83812] nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not supported on global/shared address space

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83812 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/83812] nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not supported on global/shared address space

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83812 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge --- By the way, curious why this isn't caught at compile time ('ptxas' verification) but only at run time (CUDA Driver/PTX JIT).

[Bug target/100678] New: [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678 Bug ID: 100678 Summary: [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug target/100678] [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- I ran into this in a different OpenACC context (OpenACC privatization levels), where in testcases we're trying to use 'atomic' on 'private' variables. ... which for nvptx offloading only works for gang-pr

[Bug other/100695] New: Format decoder, quoting in 'dump_printf' etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100695 Bug ID: 100695 Summary: Format decoder, quoting in 'dump_printf' etc. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/107453] [13 Regression] New stdarg tests in r13-3549-g4fe34cdcc80ac2 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107453 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > No testing on nvptx Thanks, confirming fixed for nvptx target, too.

[Bug fortran/108349] LTO mismatch for __builtin_realloc between glibc and gfortran frontend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108349 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug modula2/108373] New: Update 'contrib/gcc_update:files_and_dependencies' for Modula-2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108373 Bug ID: 108373 Summary: Update 'contrib/gcc_update:files_and_dependencies' for Modula-2 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/108377] New: Unexpected 'exceeds maximum object size' diagnostic, wrong-code?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108377 Bug ID: 108377 Summary: Unexpected 'exceeds maximum object size' diagnostic, wrong-code? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/108377] Unexpected 'exceeds maximum object size' diagnostic, wrong-code?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108377 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- That's x86_64-pc-linux-gnu at today's commit de99049f6fe5341024d4d939ac50d063280f90db.

[Bug tree-optimization/108377] Unexpected 'exceeds maximum object size' diagnostic, wrong-code?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108377 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- Thanks, Andrew, for looking into this. (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > If calc_n(259) returns (__SIZE_TYPE__)-1 (aka 18446744073709551615) [...] > the warning is correct ([...]) in some sens

[Bug tree-optimization/108392] New: Unexpected optimization in presence of '__attribute__((noipa))'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108392 Bug ID: 108392 Summary: Unexpected optimization in presence of '__attribute__((noipa))' Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/108558] New: OpenMP/Fortran 'has_device_addr' clause getting lost?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108558 Bug ID: 108558 Summary: OpenMP/Fortran 'has_device_addr' clause getting lost? Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/108558] OpenMP/Fortran 'has_device_addr' clause getting lost?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108558 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > I bet that this is a problem of 'gfc_split_omp_clauses': [...] Heh, so indeed as I suspected: (In reply to myself from comment #0) > (Decomposed combined con

[Bug fortran/85364] Fortran '-fopenmp'/'-fopenacc' should not put array in program on the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85364 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc Last reconfirmed|2018-04-13

[Bug sanitizer/108106] [13 Regression] /usr/bin/ld: .libs/hwasan_setjmp_x86_64.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `__interceptor_sigsetjmp' can not be used when making a shared object; recompi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/108713] New: ICE during RTL pass: into_cfglayout for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu '-m32', C++ 'libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108713 Bug ID: 108713 Summary: ICE during RTL pass: into_cfglayout for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu '-m32', C++ 'libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c' Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/108713] ICE during RTL pass: into_cfglayout for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu '-m32', C++ 'libgomp.c-c++-common/for-11.c'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108713 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > If you can reproduce it with vanilla trunk, it is worth it, sure, but > without a reliable reproducer there isn't much to do. I'll attempt to reproduce with c

[Bug c++/87656] Useful flags to enable with -Wall or -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c/108753] New: '-Wduplicated-cond' doesn't diagnose duplicated subexpressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108753 Bug ID: 108753 Summary: '-Wduplicated-cond' doesn't diagnose duplicated subexpressions Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug translation/108890] Translation mistakes 2023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108890 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC

[Bug libgomp/108895] [13.0.1 (exp)] Fortran + gfx90a !$acc update device produces a segfault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108895 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-02-23 CC|

[Bug libgomp/90596] 'GOACC_parallel_keyed' should use 'GOMP_MAP_VARS_TARGET'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90596 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100001] [GCN offloading] Occasional 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/static-variable-1.c' execution failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|[GCN offloadin

[Bug target/100001] [GCN offloading] Occasional 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/static-variable-1.c' execution failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- With my recent commit r13-6590-gf8332e52a498df480f72303de32ad0751ad899fe "Use 'GOMP_MAP_VARS_TARGET' for OpenACC compute constructs [PR90596]", the frequency of those FAILs has increased to (almost) always

[Bug libgomp/93030] [OpenACC] libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/deep-copy-10.c FAILS on AMDGCN – invalid 'async' usage?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93030 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-07-27 00:00:00 |2023-3-14 Keywords|

[Bug libgomp/109124] New: 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-2-lib.c', 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-2.c' GCN offloading execution test FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109124 Bug ID: 109124 Summary: 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-2-lib.c', 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-2.c' GCN offloading execution test FAILs Product: gcc Version:

[Bug middle-end/109128] [Offload][OpenMP][OpenACC] Static linking with unused offload function will lead to mismatch number of offload fn/symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109128 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-14 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/100657] [GCN offloading] 'libgomp.c-c++-common/reduction-6.c' execution times out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100657 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/104717] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (Error: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104717 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- Reproduced, thanks for the report. The problem disappears when adding '-fno-ipa-pta' to '-O1 -fopenacc -fstack-arrays'. Not yet analyzed the differences. The problem does not reproduce with '-O1 -fope

[Bug middle-end/104757] [12 Regression] ICE (segfault) GIMPLE pass: walloca - in gimple_range_global

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104757 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/104757] [12 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in GIMPLE pass: walloca - in gimple_range_global / segfault as SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT is NULL for 'if' clause arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104757 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/104774] New: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: internal compiler error: 'verify_gimple' failed, with 'loop' with explicit 'seq' or 'independent'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104774 Bug ID: 104774 Summary: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: internal compiler error: 'verify_gimple' failed, with 'loop' with explicit 'seq' or 'independent' Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/104784] New: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: C vs. C++ differences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104784 Bug ID: 104784 Summary: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: C vs. C++ differences Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc Severity: minor

[Bug middle-end/104132] OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed, error: non-register as LHS of binary operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104132 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug middle-end/104133] OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: internal compiler error: 'verify_gimple' failed, error: invalid operands in binary operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104133 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/104791] [12 regression] libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-decompose-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104791 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/104791] [12 regression] libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-decompose-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104791 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sc

[Bug testsuite/104791] [12 regression] libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-decompose-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104791 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/102330] [12 Regression] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.c:3932 since r12-980-g29a2f51806c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102330 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/104774] OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: internal compiler error: 'verify_gimple' failed, with 'loop' with explicit 'seq' or 'independent'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104774 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/90115] OpenACC: predetermined private levels for variables declared in blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90115 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/104086] ICE in lower_omp_target, at omp-low.c:13075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104086 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Assignee|

[Bug middle-end/104892] New: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: wrong-code cases unless manually making certain variables addressable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104892 Bug ID: 104892 Summary: OpenACC 'kernels' decomposition: wrong-code cases unless manually making certain variables addressable Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFI

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >