|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
.
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Even with the PR100280 etc. ICEs fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104892
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks -- I'm confirming:
PASS: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c (test for excess
errors)
[-XFAIL:-]{+PASS:+} libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c
execution test
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ams at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Can we close this as fixed?
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #5)
> yes, that builds now
..., but "fixed" only if you qua
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104088
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever con
,
||frederik at gcc dot gnu.org,
||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #34 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I'm totally lacking all co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105042
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-28
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93260
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ams at gcc dot gnu.org, jules at gcc dot gnu.or
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2)
> As mentioned before by amonakov, a possibility is to add alias support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101544
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101544
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Schwinge ---
One concrete question, on example of:
(In reply to myself from comment #8)
> hard-code '-foffload-options=nvptx-none=-mptx=6.3\ -malias' to work around
> GCC PR105018 "[nvptx] Need better alias support"
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Indeed I had added the 'assert' to prevent bogus behavior further down the line
-- and we've now found another offender. I'm planning to look into that, but
it'll take
-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: nvptx
I found this during my
s: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: sayle at gcc dot gnu.org, vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: --
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Please re-try after recent commit
r13-2108-g5dbc94bf13c5ef2f2b777d76d7880fe2153aa37b "Add libgo dependency on
libbacktrace".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102310
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I found that the '-O2' ICE 'during IPA pass: cp' originally reported here as
well as the '-O0' ICE 'during RTL pass: expand' do disappear with Julian's
recent r13-2665-g23baa717c991d77f206a9358ce2c04960ccf
D
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107026
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107026
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|NEW
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-12
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks for the report!
Probably a duplicate of PR93554: exactly same ICE, backtrace.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107227
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Spencer Bryngelson from comment #0)
> 5 | !$acc parallel loop private(arr(1:10))
> |1
> Error: Syntax error in OpenMP variable list at (1)
That's bec
NCONFIRMED
Keywords: compare-debug-failure, openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: erozen at microsoft dot com
Blocks: 10427
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32927
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100400
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #8)
> Any chance we can get r13-262-gda6305558bab9e24943848e4fc5bd8738d7e8f9b
> backported to gcc 12? kernels-decompose-pr100400-1-2.c still fails there
Now done, and so
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org, amacleod at redhat
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: nvptx
GCC/nvptx has a "SESE region optimization",
<https://inbox.sourc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107344
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105421
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100530
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |debug
Keywords|accepts-inva
gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Schwinge ---
OpenACC 3.2, 1.16 "Changes from Version 3.1 to 3.2": "The 'async', 'wait' [...]
clauses may be specified on 'data' constructs." (Not yet implemented in GCC.)
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=100400|
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101292
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ams at gcc dot gnu.org, jules at gcc dot gnu.org, msebor at
gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: gcn
The recent commit r12-6592-g72332337e3d8acbb21398b8d123f1bfe77a8327e "Use
en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100400
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-05-11 00:00:00 |2022-1-19
Component|tree-opt
oduct: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.or
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: sayle at gcc dot gnu.org, vries at gcc dot gnu.or
NCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104364
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks for having confirmed my findings and doubts -- seems I did correctly
understand a thing or two. ;-)
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> > .
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-04
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Even simpler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102330
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
D
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
If you compile offloading code for example with
'-foff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 52370
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52370&action=edit
'_muldc3-good.o'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 52371
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52371&action=edit
'_muldc3-bad.o'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 52372
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52372&action=edit
'_muldc3-WIP.o'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge ---
All your three patches combined still doesn't help resolve the problem.
And, what I realized: they don't even change the Nvidia/CUDA Driver reported
"used [...] registers".
Does that mean that the Driver "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Well. Here's another problem.
Re-testing things using a "bad" '__muldc3' from a build with your three patches
applied, I notice that my '_muldc3-WIP.o' "old"/replacement code uses a
'set.u32.leu.f64', 'n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104423
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Schwinge ---
OK! Putting your "nvptx: Add support for 64-bit mul.hi (and other)
instructions" on top, that considerably changes (simplifies!) the generated
'__muldc3' PTX code; the regression disappears. :-)
(I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102330
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Jakub, thanks again for your comments!
I've written down the following while working through the issue. Maybe you'd
like to verify, and maybe it'll useful for someone later (if only my future
self...).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101204
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
|--- |DUPLICATE
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords|wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
D
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As we found in the course of PR101204, there are ways
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101204
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79872
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83336
Bug 83336 depends on bug 79872, which changed state.
Bug 79872 Summary: document placeholder %K in gcc-internal-format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79872
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103244
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ams at gcc dot gnu.org, jules at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: GCN
GCN target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103244
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Summary|[12 regre
?id=101292|
Last reconfirmed|2021-10-13 00:00:00 |2021-11-24
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
ACK. See also my "'gengtype' generates duplicate functions" note in
<http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46476
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46476
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Without offloading, a few of the new test cases FAIL; please adjust:
+PASS: libgomp.c++/target-lambda-1.C (test for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103697
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to paul.luckner from comment #2)
> integer, allocatable :: i(:)
> i = [1]
Is that PR77504?
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
For example:
xgcc: error: unrecognized
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
ds: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ams at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, jules at
gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101551
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I've noticed that with an offloading-enabled build of GCC we're losing "note:
in expansion of macro '[...]'" diagnostics. (Effectively
'-ftrack-macro-expansion=0'?)
For example, 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-commo
||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-13
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I've ran into this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102310
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
CC|
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Just
> program p
> !$omp taskloop lastprivate(i)
> do i = 1, 8
> end do
> !$acc parallel loop
> do i = 1, 8
tus: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
'du
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102362
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Here, to emit 'note: [...]' ('-fopt-info-note') if because of certain input
source code characteristics (derived from
'DECL_ATTRIBUTES(current_function_decl)'), certain code transformations
do/don't need t
||2021-09-20
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||openacc
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102408
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
ED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: frederik at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Working on OpenACC &#
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-28
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to seurer from
|1
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|
|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |
Host|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|
|powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102500
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigne
Keywords: openacc, openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ams at gcc dot gnu.org, caplanr at predsci dot com,
jules
|ASSIGNED
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-14
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
||openacc
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106208
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106643
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=96668
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Has this been fixed via PR96668 "[O
701 - 800 of 1213 matches
Mail list logo
