: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tsaunders at mozilla dot com
Created attachment 30680
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30680&action=edit
preprocessed and somewhat reduced test ca
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tsaunders at mozilla dot com
CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz
Its ceretainly possible given
https://blog.mozilla.org/nnethercote/2013/09/12/bleg-for-a-new-machine-2/ (I'm
not sure what versions njn is usin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58868
Trevor Saunders changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsaunders at mozilla dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482
Trevor Saunders changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsaunders at mozilla dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482
--- Comment #3 from Trevor Saunders ---
Created attachment 32938
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32938&action=edit
test case
Its pretty close to undreadable, but its fairly reduced, it started at ~400k
lines.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482
--- Comment #5 from Trevor Saunders ---
> Could you please post the full gcc invocation?
Err yeah that would be useful ;)
gcc -flto -r -Os -nostdlib -std=gnu++11 start.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61598
Trevor Saunders changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsaunders at mozilla dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63621
--- Comment #6 from Trevor Saunders ---
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 03:32:37PM +, trippels at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63621
>
> --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
> (In reply to tbsaunde fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60154
Trevor Saunders changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsaunders at mozilla dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61631
--- Comment #2 from Trevor Saunders ---
> r211936 PASS
> [r211937..r211985) not build with --enable-checking=fold due PR61598
> r211985 FAIL
I think if you apply r211985 directly on top of r211937 you'll find that
bootstraps, so presumably some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #1 from Trevor Saunders ---
The following patch compiles with 4.9 for me, but I don't have easy
access to a machine with 4.5 on it, would you mind testing if it works
for you?
diff --git a/gcc/hash-table.h b/gcc/hash-table.h
index 22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #3 from Trevor Saunders ---
> (In reply to Trevor Saunders from comment #1)
> > The following patch compiles with 4.9 for me, but I don't have easy
> > access to a machine with 4.5 on it, would you mind testing if it works
> > for you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #6 from Trevor Saunders ---
> --- Comment #4 from Gary Funck ---
> Created attachment 33076
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33076&action=edit
> make log after trying patch
thanks! I think the attached patch sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63229
--- Comment #3 from Trevor Saunders ---
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Likely r214834.
I bet its the same as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00730.html which I'll
commit the fix for as soon as it finishes testing.
14 matches
Mail list logo