[Bug libstdc++/69310] [6 Regression] Revision r232454 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310 --- Comment #7 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Does this patch fix the issue on Darwin? https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01452.html

[Bug libstdc++/69310] [6 Regression] Revision r232454 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310 --- Comment #11 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #10) > It is unclear if the changes in r232454, to avoid the explicit linkage on > libitm, can ever be made darwin-friendly. On darwin, every

[Bug libstdc++/69310] [6 Regression] Revision r232454 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310 --- Comment #14 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: torvald Date: Wed Jan 20 17:47:03 2016 New Revision: 232628 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232628&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++: Darwin does not support weak refs

[Bug libstdc++/69310] [6 Regression] Revision r232454 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c/59218] atomic transactions: accesses to volatiles not disallowed in transaction_safe code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59218 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug tree-optimization/53991] _mm_popcnt_u64 fails with -O3 -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991 --- Comment #9 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still fails with r232693. This seems to be another case of difficult ordering between TM passes and other passes. It makes sense that we don't inline tm_pure because we must not loose

[Bug c/57855] passing unsafe function as transaction_safe function pointer does not generate error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57855 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status

[Bug middle-end/57348] [TM] ICE for transaction expression in gimplify_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57348 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libitm/69018] libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/c++.exp: libstdc++ include paths don't work if tests set options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69018 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status

[Bug c++/60908] compiler bug related to trans-mem.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60908 --- Comment #4 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still happens with r232693.

[Bug c++/60908] compiler bug related to trans-mem.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60908 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spear at cse dot lehigh.edu

[Bug c++/63472] transaction_atomic within while loop causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63472 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/63550] Multiple definition errors occur only with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63550 --- Comment #1 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37421 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37421&action=edit Test case part 1/3

[Bug c++/63550] Multiple definition errors occur only with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63550 --- Comment #2 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37422 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37422&action=edit Test case part 2/3

[Bug c++/63550] Multiple definition errors occur only with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63550 --- Comment #3 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37423 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37423&action=edit Test case part 3/3

[Bug c++/63550] Multiple definition errors occur only with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63550 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/59767] __atomic_load_n with __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST should result in a memory barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59767 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/67281] HTM builtins aren't treated as compiler barriers on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67281 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/49581] New: [trans-mem] save/restore of thread-local data in nested txns is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49581 Summary: [trans-mem] save/restore of thread-local data in nested txns is missing Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/65033] C++11 atomics: is_lock_free result does not always match the real lock-free property

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org

<    1   2