[Bug c++/52126] New: compilation error

2012-02-05 Thread tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 Bug #: 52126 Summary: compilation error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/52126] [4.7 Regression] compilation error

2012-02-05 Thread tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 --- Comment #2 from tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com 2012-02-05 20:57:29 UTC --- Further investigation shows that the issue appears only when inheritance from the template class (class B : private A) is provided explicitly. According to the standard

[Bug c++/59144] New: weird behavior when dealing with too complicated templates and class hierarchy

2013-11-14 Thread tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com gcc 4.8.2 linux x86_64 Please consider the following code: class Base { public: virtual ~Base() {} protected: void foo() const

[Bug c++/59144] weird behavior when dealing with too complicated templates and class hierarchy

2013-11-16 Thread tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59144 --- Comment #3 from tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to tmmikolajczyk from comment #0) > > The compilation passes (on gcc and clang). It's quite weird that the > >

[Bug libstdc++/59283] New: missing std::basic_string constructor

2013-11-25 Thread tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com The C++11 standard specifies the following c-tor in the std::basic_string class: basic_string (const basic_string&, const allocator_type&); It looks like the c-tor is missing in the current