http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51751
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-01-08
10:13:33 UTC ---
Also reported upstream:
http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=3030&p=7974#p7974
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51638
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51638
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2012-01-23
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2012-01-23
18:57:13 UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51958
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-01-28
17:39:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 26493
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26493
Patch
Let's see if this survives regression-testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88411
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88411
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
The problem appears to be that the record length is set to zero
a file with the same unit number is opened again.
Hmm... some more digging is needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88411
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hm, maybe something else.
It seems we're actually writing direct access files in the
main thread, even when using asynchronous I/O.
Hmm...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88411
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Something glaringly obvious just struck me: The test case
has synchronous writes for a file which is opened asynchronously.
This may or may not have been intended. It is certainly a bug
not to get this righ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88411
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
This looks like it could do the trick:
Index: io/transfer.c
===
--- io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88411
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Dec 9 18:54:47 2018
New Revision: 266929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-09 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/88411
* io/trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88411
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88364
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
A simple fix is not to do the clobbers if there is a reference:
Index: trans-expr.c
===
--- trans-expr.c(Revision 266250)
+++ trans-exp
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Index: frontend-passes.c
===
--- frontend-passes.c (Revision 266251)
+++ frontend-passes.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1880,15 +1880,14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88363
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Dec 16 14:32:46 2018
New Revision: 267187
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267187&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-16 Thomas Koenig
PF fortran/88364
* trans-ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88364
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41453
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Also still to do: Do some more precise clobbering for
the case of PR88364, i.e. for
call foo(a&x)
clobber a%x, which is currently not done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
The problem with the patch in comment #6 is that it pessimizes code
like
b = (-1)**a
So, some more thinking required...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88533
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Dec 22 14:14:44 2018
New Revision: 267347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-22 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85544
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Dec 22 14:21:01 2018
New Revision: 267348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267348&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-22 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/8554
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Dec 22 19:19:14 2018
New Revision: 267355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-22 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #10)
> Handling positive powers of 2 should be straightforward:
>
> The condition is sth. like
>
> if (v > 1 && (v & (v-1) == 0))
>
> and the exponent is derived
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Dec 22 20:16:22 2018
New Revision: 267360
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267360&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-22 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR for
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
After PR 85544 has been fixed, there are some optimizations
possible which are detailed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544#c13 and
https://gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88579
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44790|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 31 14:59:46 2018
New Revision: 267487
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267487&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-31 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/82995
* trans-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82313
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82743
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 1 21:19:53 2019
New Revision: 267499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267499&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-01 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/82743
* primary.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
Bug 19276 depends on bug 82743, which changed state.
Bug 82743 Summary: uncaught character truncation in derived type initialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82743
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82743
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88611
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34816
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jan 2 15:25:47 2019
New Revision: 267517
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267517&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/48543
* gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jan 3 12:32:34 2019
New Revision: 267553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267553&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/48543
* gfortran.dg/cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88669
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88669
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Works when class(t) is replaced by type(t), so the attributes
were not correctly set somewhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Jan 4 10:42:12 2019
New Revision: 267572
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267572&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-04 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/48543
* gfortran.dg/cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86-64-pc-cygwin
--- Comment #7 from Tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88658
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 6 12:48:58 2019
New Revision: 267609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267609&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/88658
* gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88658
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 88713, which changed state.
Bug 88713 Summary: _gfortran_internal_pack@PLT prevents vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hm.
It would help if your benchmark was complete, so I could run it.
However, what happens if you put int
real, dimension(:) :: Uix
real, dimension(:), intent(in) :: x
real, dime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 88713, which changed state.
Bug 88713 Summary: Vectorized code slow vs. flang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
What|Removed |Added
-
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45360
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45360&action=edit
Generated libgcov-profiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 45361
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45361&action=edit
config log
Here's the config.log from the configure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 45362
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45362&action=edit
config.status
And here is the config.log.
See also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88729 , which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I think the proper way of booting with -Og would be setting BOOT_CFLAGS
> rather than CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS. Note the issue might be the use of -save-temps.
I saw th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88611
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> But given that the right type we want is already passed in type, I'd say:
> --- gcc/trans-expr.c.jj 2019-01-01 12:37:52.0 +0100
> +++ gcc/trans-expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jan 7 19:30:28 2019
New Revision: 267657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-07 Thomas Koenig
Harald Anlauf
Tobias Burnus
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Implemented, closing.
Harald, thanks a lot for picking this up again and for preparing
the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 45424, which changed state.
Bug 45424 Summary: [F08] Add IS_CONTIGUOUS intrinsic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53320
Bug 53320 depends on bug 45424, which changed state.
Bug 45424 Summary: [F08] Add IS_CONTIGUOUS intrinsic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738
Bug 82738 depends on bug 88728, which changed state.
Bug 88728 Summary: Boostrap with -Og fails with garbled file libgcov-profiler.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88728
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87851
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here is the result of running f951 with -O under the debugger
and breaking on optimize_expr:
Breakpoint 1, optimize_expr (e=0x2688cf0, walk_subtrees=0x7fffd81c,
data=0x0) at ../../trunk/gcc/fortran/front
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
What an inline packing would (approximately) produce is this:
subroutine processBPP(X, BPP, N)
integer,intent(in) :: N
real, dimension(N,3), intent(out)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88653
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53320
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68426
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68426
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jan 9 20:31:07 2019
New Revision: 267781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-09 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68426
* simplify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68426
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
I'll look at this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
So, test case #1 is fixed.
Scrolling down, there are still a few more to be done, so I'll
leave it open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Jan 11 06:32:10 2019
New Revision: 267829
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267829&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/59345
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 13 11:06:03 2019
New Revision: 267903
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267903&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/59345
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig ---
I have asked in
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/comp.lang.fortran$20contiguous$20dummy%7Csort:date/comp.lang.fortran/QiFkx8b48uw/wtQE9M_aFwAJ
.
Let's see what sort of answers there will be, apart f
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's see if I can do anything about this...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67277
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> More annoying than the warnings id the text displayed in the manual:
>
> the See CONVERT specifier on the open statement or the See
> GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNI
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
After the fix for 56789, only one case left, the call to f2
(contiguous pointer).
Should be straightforward...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Because the packing / unpacking routines are opaque, they
could result in lots of missed opportunities for inlining.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Chris Elrod from comment #3)
> Created attachment 45014 [details]
> Code that produces lots of unnecessary and performance-crippling
> _gfortran_internal_pack@PLT and _gfortran_internal_unpack@PL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 13 14:57:39 2019
New Revision: 267905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/57992
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 13 14:57:39 2019
New Revision: 267905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/57992
* trans-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 57992, which changed state.
Bug 57992 Summary: Pointless packing of contiguous arrays for simply contiguous
functions results as actual arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||40976
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52351
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Looking into this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43136
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hm, maybe one could simply remove the substring during resolution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87018
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 45431
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45431&action=edit
Patch which works, but causes some regressions
Apparently, in argument_checking_13.f90, the test in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88810
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2019-01-15
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> How does gfortran differential between new Fortran code and
&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43072
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 15 22:18:55 2019
New Revision: 267953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-15 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/43072
* resolve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43136
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 15 22:20:26 2019
New Revision: 267954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-15 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/43136
* resolve.
801 - 900 of 3746 matches
Mail list logo
