at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
A big part is fixed now.
Do people think that the case of comment#8 is worth fixing?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2013-07-21
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Confirmed.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-07-21
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53309
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
The runtime test is done by _gfortran_internal_pack. -Warray-temporaries
creates the warning if this is called.
If you want to know if a temporary has actually been created,
use -fcheck-array-temporaries.
D
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Working on it a little bit.
: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
The following is illegal:
program main
real, dimension(4) :: a,b
read (*,*) a
b([1,2,3,2]) = a
print *,b
end
See F 2008, 6.5.3.3.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58009
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58009
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
I also want to catch
a([i,j,i]) = ...
for which I cannot think of an algorithm which is O(n),
so I guess it will have to be O(n**2).
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58009
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58027
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766
Bug 27766 depends on bug 39286, which changed state.
Bug 39286 Summary: Missing out-of-bounds diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39286
What|Removed |Added
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Closing as dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 36683 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36683
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 36928, which changed state.
Bug 36928 Summary: array temporary for interleaving assignment with
non-constant start values
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36928
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36928
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38111
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 39280, which changed state.
Bug 39280 Summary: Optimizing integer power
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39280
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39280
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Target Milestone|4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Files modified in the GCC repository. Log entry:
2013-08-12 Thomas Koenig
* gcc-4.9/changes.html: Document -Wzerotrip.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
The following doesn't trigger an error at compile time,
neither does it do so with -fcheck=all at runtime:
ig25@linux-fd1f:/tmp> cat diff.f90
program main
implicit none
integer :: n
real, dimension(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 30647
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30647&action=edit
Proposed patch
This should work for a compile-time check,
where this is possible.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Actually, the patch doesn't work (yet).
Working on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> Technically a(n+1:n+4) is within the bounds, the out of bounds comes from
> the loop with a 5-sized array.
The array expressions are not conformable, so it is a b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58177
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58027
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
It might actually be better to move calling arith_error
to resolution stage.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
In principle, we could also introduce a
!GCC$ NOWARN
directive, which could suppress all warnings on the following statement.
I'm not volunteering, though :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57798
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2013-08-28
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52243
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Aug 29 11:44:41 2013
New Revision: 202070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/52243
* trans-expr.c (is_r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52243
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed on trunk, closing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52243
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2013-08-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56519
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33906
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Dup of 33906.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 33906 ***
at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-21
11:37:45 UTC ---
This one should be easy enough.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-21
12:02:16 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 21 12:02:12 2011
New Revision: 177940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177940
Log:
2011-08-21 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/50130
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47659
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-21
16:35:31 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 21 16:35:28 2011
New Revision: 177942
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177942
Log:
2011-08-21 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/47659
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-22
15:12:09 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Aug 22 15:12:04 2011
New Revision: 177961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177961
Log:
2011-08-22 Thomas Koenig
Backport from tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011-08-22
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
Summary|Internal compiler error due |[4.5 Regression] Internal
|to explicit array bounds in |compiler error due to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
Bug #: 50192
Summary: Wrong character comparision with wide strings
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36313
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-26
11:28:17 UTC ---
Should be straightforward to fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40866
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-28
10:08:54 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 28 10:08:50 2011
New Revision: 178140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178140
Log:
2011-08-28 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/4086
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-29
09:05:18 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Aug 29 09:05:11 2011
New Revision: 178173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178173
Log:
2011-08-29 Thomas Koenig
PR libfortran/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-29
14:12:01 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Aug 29 14:11:54 2011
New Revision: 178238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178238
Log:
2011-08-29 Thomas Koenig
Backport from tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-30
21:36:53 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Aug 30 21:36:48 2011
New Revision: 178341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178341
Log:
2011-08-30 Thomas Koenig
Backport from tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50267
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2011-09-09
21:59:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 25236
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25236
Tentative patch
This one replaces a DO WHILE loop with its equivalent,
DO
IF (.not. ...) EXIT
form
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2011-09-10
14:07:01 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Sep 10 14:06:57 2011
New Revision: 178748
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178748
Log:
2011-09-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/4947
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig 2011-09-11
09:16:08 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Sep 11 09:16:03 2011
New Revision: 178757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178757
Log:
2011-09-11 Thomas Koenig
Backport fron t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2011-09-11
12:06:48 UTC ---
Closing as duplicate as suggested.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 41209 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41209
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2011-09-11
12:06:48 UTC ---
*** Bug 49501 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2011-09-11
20:48:29 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Sep 11 20:48:26 2011
New Revision: 178768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178768
Log:
2011-09-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/50327
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2011-10-08
21:41:11 UTC ---
FORALL sucks rocks through a straw.
We cannot use the usual front-end optimization within forall, because
forall(iTime=1:2)
tmp = dble(iTime)
timeSteps(iTime)=ratio**(tmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50688
Bug #: 50688
Summary: OpenMP: Strange interaction with BLOCK
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Seve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2011-10-10
19:07:38 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Oct 10 19:07:35 2011
New Revision: 179770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179770
Log:
2011-10-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/5056
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
Bug #: 50690
Summary: ICE with front end optimization and OMP workshare
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25468|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|tkoenig at gcc
at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2011-10-22
08:10:45 UTC ---
Updated patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02003.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-29
07:03:25 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-29
07:12:10 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 29 07:12:03 2012
New Revision: 186942
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186942
Log:
2012-04-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/53148
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-30
19:31:24 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Apr 30 19:31:13 2012
New Revision: 186999
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186999
Log:
2012-04-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/53148
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2012-05-01
09:45:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Is there any progress with this? The issue persists with gcc 4.7.0 final and
> the workaround wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2012-05-11
13:56:16 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri May 11 13:56:06 2012
New Revision: 187406
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187406
Log:
2012-05-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/52537
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2012-05-11
18:50:27 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri May 11 18:50:14 2012
New Revision: 187413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187413
Log:
2012-05-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/52537
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2012-05-11
19:16:08 UTC ---
Does this fix the problem?
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2012-05-11
20:38:53 UTC ---
Fixed together with PR 50673.
Closing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53343
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502
Bug #: 53502
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken with
--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-06
18:08:10 UTC ---
This should be rather simple. Not-yet-regression-tested patch:
Index: frontend-passes.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-07
11:12:02 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jun 7 11:11:55 2012
New Revision: 188300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188300
Log:
2012-06-07 Thomas König
PR fortran/52861
601 - 700 of 3768 matches
Mail list logo
