https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92569
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Nov 25 20:04:28 2019
New Revision: 278702
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278702&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix EOF handling for arrays.
2019-11-25 Thomas Koenig
Haral
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92569
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Nov 25 22:26:26 2019
New Revision: 278710
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278710&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix EOF handling for arrays.
2019-11-25 Thomas Koenig
Harald An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92569
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-10/msg01757.html (r277518)
has
FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxlocval_4.f90 -O2 execution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92682
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92698
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91783
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Nov 30 15:02:50 2019
New Revision: 278873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278873&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not look at _data component in gfc_dep_resolver.
2019-11-30 Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91783
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Nov 30 15:08:32 2019
New Revision: 278874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk as an insurance policy.
2019-11-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91783
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92698
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Sunil Pandey from comment #20)
> Created attachment 46851 [details]
> Compile time regression reproducer.
>
> attached reproducer show ~28X compile time regression after the commit. See
> the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> So wrf grew starting with r271377, size (w/o debug info) goes from 20164464B
> to 23674792.
I think we've had this discussion before, although I cannot offhand
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #11)
> Would using -frepack-arrays solve this issue? I proposed making that the
> default a while back. It would do any repacking that is necessary at call
> sites rather tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> People who have problems can then enable
I meant disable, of course.
> that option for
> the specific files they have the problems with.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Andrew Benson from comment #10)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8)
> > Also, why do you use inquire at all? AFAIK, it is not an error
> > to OPEN a file more than one if you don't ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92682
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40362
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92755
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Dec 8 12:25:15 2019
New Revision: 279086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92755
* dependen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92755
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92764
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Dec 8 13:02:54 2019
New Revision: 279087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92764
* interface.c (gfc
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the bug report!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92780
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Dec 8 13:42:42 2019
New Revision: 279088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Error on Associate with a program.
2018-12-08 Thomas Koenig
PR
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed. Thanks for the bug report!
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's where it segfaults with 7.4.0:
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/7.4.0/f951.exe tst.f
-ffixed-form -quiet -dumpbase tst.f -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase tst
-g -ffpe-trap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47441
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47441&action=edit
Output of valgrind --tool=helgrind
The code from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-12/msg00020.html :
prog
||2019-12-09
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Probably a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92863
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
This looks reasonable:
Index: misc.c
===
--- misc.c (Revision 279064)
+++ misc.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -164,9 +164,17 @@ gfc_typename (gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92863
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Dec 10 18:31:33 2019
New Revision: 279180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279180&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92863
* misc.c (gfc_type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92863
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89047
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89047
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #4)
> Where does this line come from ?
> >18 | c = g
Nowhere (as fas as this PR is concerned). Different test case,
please disregard comment #3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91643
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Dec 10 21:59:09 2019
New Revision: 279203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91643
* trans-array.c (g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91643
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90350
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2019-12-11
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
I'll see what I can do.
I think this is still something that we could do for the g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92913
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47483&action=edit
concept patch for subroutine vs. function
Here is a concept patch for subroutine vs. function. I have moved
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92114
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92913
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47483|0 |1
is obsolete|
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's mark it as such, then.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87103 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87103
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreas at skeidsvoll dot no
--- Comment
||2019-12-15
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE in |[F03] Implement KIND
|gfc_trans_assignment_1, at |argument for INDEX
|fortran/trans-expr.c:11010 |
Ever
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92958
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92958
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Also seen on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 20 11:51:05 2019
New Revision: 279639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Introduce -finline-arg-packing.
2019-12-20 Thomas Koenig
PR mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 20 11:51:05 2019
New Revision: 279639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Introduce -finline-arg-packing.
2019-12-20 Thomas Koenig
PR mi
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed, then. Thanks for the patch and the bug report!
||2019-12-20
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Still fails with current trunk; not fixed with the fix for PR92781.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig ---
Could you check if this still occurs if you use -finline-arg-packing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 92738, which changed state.
Bug 92738 Summary: [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries
between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91661
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92976
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
||2019-12-23
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91310
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91310
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Comment on attachment 46648
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46648
test case 1
Oops, correction. If len is small enough, the test case can be
valid (well, it could be if str was ever assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91310
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:34:11 2019
New Revision: 279762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279762&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:43:38 2019
New Revision: 279763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove KIND argument from INDEX so it does not mess up scalarization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|9.2.1
Summary|[8/9/10 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:43:38 2019
New Revision: 279763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove KIND argument from INDEX so it does not mess up scalarization.
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:47:39 2019
New Revision: 279765
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279765&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91651
Fix PR num
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47567
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47567&action=edit
config.log
Not sure if this is a gcc 8 or a trunk issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> And please also fix the comment in the new test.
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> > (In reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 12:35:05 2019
New Revision: 279766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91651
* gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 13:10:37 2019
New Revision: 279767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |keremkat+gcc at gmail
dot com
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Kerem Kat from comment #4)
> Please assign to me.
Happy to oblige.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||93104
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92993
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/10 Regression] Current |[10 Regression] Current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|93104 |
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #6)
> This has been fixed, see comment 5.
>
> I do not have permission to changes the status so somebody that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 15:27:08 2019
New Revision: 279769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279769&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 15:29:30 2019
New Revision: 279770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Excellent news: The __builtin_memcpy cases have been fixed in the
meantime, and using __builtin_memset for values of more than one
byte doesn't work.
I will commit a test case and then close.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Correction: The rank-1 copying cases are now handled by the middle end,
the two-dimensional case isn't.
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
$ cat matmul.f90
program main
complex, dimension(:,:), allocatable :: a,b,c
read (*,*) n
allocate (a(n,n), b(n,n), c(n,n))
call
||2020-01-01
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93113
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Reduced test case:
program main
complex, dimension(10,10) :: a
a%re = a%re - 0.5
end program main
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We could be using span instead of creating a temporary array here:
$ cat x.f90
module x
type y
real :: a, b
end type y
contains
subroutine foo
type(y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93113
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jan 1 21:40:35 2020
New Revision: 279821
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279821&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle REF_INQUIRY for dependency checking.
2020-01-01 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93113
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91648
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Should be rather simple to fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91640
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45596
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87797
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Could be made an addition to -Wintrinsic-shadow.
||2020-01-05
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Confirmed.
301 - 400 of 3746 matches
Mail list logo
