Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
After the fix for PR 56867, we now create temporaries for
program main
character(len=4) :: a
character(len=4) :: c(3)
c(1) = 'abcd'
c(2) = '1234'
c(3) =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
For the creation of a temporary after the fix where it is not really necessary,
see PR 64426 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
This is against gcc version 5.0.0 20141222 (experimental) (GCC), on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Consider the following two program snippets:
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Mandelbrot/Bug> cat m1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jan 5 17:15:17 2015
New Revision: 219193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219193&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-05 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/47674
* dependency.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jan 5 19:21:12 2015
New Revision: 219195
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219195&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-05 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/47674
* dependency.h:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jan 7 22:31:54 2015
New Revision: 219325
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219325&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-08 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/5686
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
I have something. Let's see if it works...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Trying to find some codepaths for PR 57023 to make sure that there
are no new regressions, find a bug...
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Pack> cat int.f90
module mymod
implicit none
contains
subroutine f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64699
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64699
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jan 21 19:40:54 2015
New Revision: 219963
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219963&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-21 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/57023
* dependency.c (ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jan 24 12:50:51 2015
New Revision: 220080
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220080&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-24 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/5702
||2015-01-24
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Summary|ICE passing coarrays to |[5 Regression] ICE passing
|subroutine |coarrays to subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64772
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |4.9.4
Summary|[5 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64771
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jan 24 15:20:56 2015
New Revision: 220082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-24 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/5702
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 57023, which changed state.
Bug 57023 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Not packing arrays with changing variable
used for size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
This is inspired by PR 57023, but it is a pure F2008 error, hence a separate
PR.
program main
integer :: n
n = 5
block
integer, dimension(n, n) :: a
a = 0
n = n - 1
call baz(a, n)
print '(5I2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64773
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|[F2008]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jan 24 21:30:15 2015
New Revision: 220085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/56867
* trans-array.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 56867, which changed state.
Bug 56867 Summary: Missing temporary with string array assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Summary|error reading (an
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Consider the following code:
module foo
implicit none
contains
subroutine bar(n)
integer, intent(in) :: n
print *,"bar before dusty",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |5.0
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
If this mechanism is in place, it could also be used to catch code like
call foo(a+1)
...
subroutine foo(a)
a = a + 1
end subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
If it is forbidden to modify an actual argument, we could make
a tempoary copy of that argument, pass that to a procedure where
it maches an intent(unknown) dummy argument, then do the comparison.
So, we wou
: libfortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Currently, when encountering EACCES or EROFS upon opening, we fall back towards
opening the file read-only.
This is
a) not documented
b) surprising for some users (an inconsistency has been
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Originally from
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28933061/using-1n-with-inherited-classes-works-weirdly-in-gfortran
:
module try_mod
implicit none
type, public :: Inner_t
integer :: i
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Any work being done on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61459
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 33115
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33115&action=edit
config.log
In revision 212492, bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61792
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61792
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here is the command line:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ig25/Gcc/trunk-bin/gcc'
g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61792
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romangareev at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61792
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61999
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62076
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
This is with current trunk, rev. 213777 .
With
MALLOC_CHECK_=3
MALLOC_PERTURB_=69
udf2.f90 in the gomp testsuite segfaults on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu :
g25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Udr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61999
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 9 22:38:46 2014
New Revision: 213782
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213782&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/61999
* simplify.c (gfc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62076
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.10 Regression] testsuite |[4.9/4.10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61999
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 10 11:25:24 2014
New Revision: 213788
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213788&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-10 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/6199
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61999
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 10 14:19:18 2014
New Revision: 213789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213789&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-10 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/6199
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61999
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60661
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Known to fail|4.10.0 |5.0
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62106
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Aug 14 18:52:12 2014
New Revision: 213980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213980&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-14 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/62106
* gfortran.h (symb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62106
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 15 20:47:30 2014
New Revision: 214038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-15 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/6210
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62106
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 15 21:19:33 2014
New Revision: 214043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214043&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-15 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/62142
* trans-expr.c (is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 16 09:45:02 2014
New Revision: 214061
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214061&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-16 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/6214
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62214
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Aug 21 18:52:58 2014
New Revision: 214281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-21 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/62214
* frontend-passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62076
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62214
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Aug 21 19:34:39 2014
New Revision: 214282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-21 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/6221
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62214
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Aug 21 21:20:27 2014
New Revision: 214296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-21 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/6221
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62214
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593
--- Comment #46 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #45)
> Anything left to fix in this PR?
Unfortunately yes...
We still do not take advantage of the fact that the call
to a subroutine cannot change the value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60550
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60110
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62278
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Can you provide an example?
The simplistic case of
subroutine foo(p)
integer, save :: a(10)[*]
integer, pointer :: p(:)
p(:) = a(:)
end subroutine foo
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Point> gfortran -c -O -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
The fix looks good.
Commit the test case from comment #5 and close?
||2014-09-01
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Tobias, I think you added the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-08-16 22:55:22 |2014-10-2
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Ko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 36868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36868&action=edit
Modified benchmark (really this time)
Hi Dominique,
I think you are seeing the effects of inefficiencies of as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Another interesting data point. I deleted the DGEMM implementation from
the file and linked against the serial version of openblas. OK,
openblas is based on GOTO blas, so we have to expect a hit
for large ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68652
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
> I took the example code found in
> http://wiki.cs.utexas.edu/rvdg/HowToOptimizeGemm/ where the register based
> vector computations are explicitly called via the SSE registers and
> converted it to use the
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This is a cut-down version of an ICE in FOODIE
( https://github.com/Fortran-FOSS-Programmers/FOODiE ).
Might be related to PR 51864, but the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69011
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69011
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67779
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 37182
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37182&action=edit
More simplified test case
This illustrates the problem - the array is passed wrong on
the first call to the su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
The error occurs for class arrays only.
Changing
class(myclass), dimension(:) :: array
to
type(mysortable), dimension(:) :: array
in the more simplified test case results in correct
behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 37190
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37190&action=edit
Test case that still fails
Hi Paul,
> (i) To fix the ICE in trans.c. This is fixed by the change to trans-stm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #21)
> the right patch this time
Works well, looks obvious.
Pre-approved if you don't think it is, in fact, obvious :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||37131
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
A quick fix is rather easy - don't do the matmul inlining
within a WHERE block. We do the same thing already for
function elimination.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 10 13:18:54 2016
New Revision: 232201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232201&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/69154
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Bug 37131 depends on bug 69154, which changed state.
Bug 69154 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_where_2, at
fortran/trans-stmt.c:5005 on *-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68829
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |tree-optimization
--- Comment #5 from Th
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
32-byte alignment (useful for avx) breaks when used in classes.
This is for 5.3 on x86_64-unknown-cygwin.
Test case:
#include
#define ALIGN __attribute__ ((aligned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66094
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 37371
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37371&action=edit
Patch to handle matmul(a, transpose(b))
This very straightforward patch handles matmul(a, transpose(b)).
I won
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66094
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 24 09:11:50 2016
New Revision: 232774
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66094
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66094
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Still to do: MATMUL(TRANSPOSE(A),B).
MATMUL(TRANSPOSE(A),TRANSPOSE(B)) would be silly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66094
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 24 18:15:08 2016
New Revision: 232779
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232779&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66094
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
*** Bug 66050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66050
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||36854
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
2901 - 3000 of 3756 matches
Mail list logo
