https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #12)
> So to be clear, the problem seems to be that while the code generation for
> the function itself appears Ok, it generates the interface wrong (i.e. uses
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Mar 19 22:03:01 2018
New Revision: 258666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84931
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Mar 19 22:49:33 2018
New Revision: 258667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84931
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84957
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 21 21:12:41 2018
New Revision: 258745
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258745&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-21 Thomas Koenig
Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed, closing.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
All test cases are fixed on trunk. Closing.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Not a regression, so this can be closed.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70068
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 24 17:37:21 2018
New Revision: 258835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/70068
* expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70068
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Still the same thing with current trunk.
Interestingly,
integer, parameter:: is(1)=(/(i,i=1,1)/)
integer, parameter :: x = is(1)
print *,x
end
is simplified correctl
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
The whole parameter array could be removed if is(1) was simplified to 1
(which it currently isn't).
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 25 12:23:58 2018
New Revision: 258844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-25 Thomas Koenig
Neil Carlson
PR fortran/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug 84094 depends on bug 84381, which changed state.
Bug 84381 Summary: replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran
testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 25 12:46:31 2018
New Revision: 258845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84381
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84693
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 25 16:00:52 2018
New Revision: 258846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258846&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-25 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84381
* testsui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug 84094 depends on bug 84381, which changed state.
Bug 84381 Summary: replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran
testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Mar 26 06:29:01 2018
New Revision: 258850
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258850&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-26 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66709
* io.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85083
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Mar 27 17:28:35 2018
New Revision: 258899
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258899&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-27 Thomas Koenig
Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85083
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed on trunk, closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85084
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
I cannot reproduce this on my system.
However, could you check if
Index: frontend-passes.c
===
--- frontend-passes.c (revision 258845)
+++ f
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85084
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> I cannot reproduce this on my system.
Actually, I can.
Let's see how this survives regression-testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85084
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Mar 27 18:42:02 2018
New Revision: 258900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-27 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85084
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85084
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 28 17:34:08 2018
New Revision: 258926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-28 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85084
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85084
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 28 17:41:51 2018
New Revision: 258927
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258927&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-28 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85084
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85084
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Well, this WORKSFORME.
Please re-open if the problem persists.
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85111
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Interesting -fdump-fortran-origial shows
Namespace: A-H: (REAL 4) I-N: (INTEGER 4) O-Z: (REAL 4)
procedure name = p
symtree: 'a' || symbol: 'a'
ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85111
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |patch
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85111
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Mar 30 09:56:46 2018
New Revision: 258973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258973&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85111
* array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85111
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Mar 30 09:58:35 2018
New Revision: 258974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85111
* array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85111
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
F2003, 6.1.1:
Let the characters in the parent string be numbered 1, 2, 3, ..., n, where n is
the length of the parent
string. Then the characters in the substring are those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Mar 30 12:18:30 2018
New Revision: 258976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85130
* gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|84094 |
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Large-scale cshift is OK now.
The original test case, or inlining something like
b = cshift(a,-1) - 2*a + cshift(a,1)
to efficiently calculate a second derivative on a circular array would be
quite nice.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
From c.l.f.
The program
! Original test case by Manfred Tietze
program show_problem
implicit none
! derived type with an array of strings with variable length
type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85144
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 85144, which changed state.
Bug 85144 Summary: Wrong assignment with allocatable charlen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85144
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg4.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
This works:
program show_problem
implicit none
character(len=:), dimension(:), allocatable :: text
allocate(character(len=3) :: text(3))
text(1) = 'abc'
text(2) = '123'
print *,text(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85102
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Apr 2 16:47:48 2018
New Revision: 259014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85102
* decl.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85102
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
OK, so I am beginning to understand...
Part of the problem seems that, in check_pure_function,
else if (gfc_pure (NULL))
{
gfc_error ("Reference to impure function %qs at %L "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85166
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85166
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Does this fix the problem?
Index: minimal.c
===
--- minimal.c (Revision 259055)
+++ minimal.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -187,3 +187,17 @@ sys_abort
||2018-04-04
Component|target |libfortran
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
This is more properly a libgfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85166
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Apr 4 09:26:13 2018
New Revision: 259072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-04 Thomas Koenig
PR libfortran/85166
* runti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85166
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2018-04-04
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Works for me with current trunk and with gcc 7:
ig25@flaemmli:~/Krempel/Leak> gfortran b.f90 meminf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85192
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82976
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
I think I have finally found the culprit. Took me a couple of hours...
The type in question is introduced in gimple-match-head.c, in
763 return (gimple_resimplify2 (seq, rcode,
764
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82976
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #10)
> I think I have finally found the culprit. Took me a couple of hours...
>
> The type in question is introduced in gimple-match-head.c, in
... or not there, ra
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Running the gfortran test
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
>From the same test run as PR 85238, but it looks unrelated at first glance:
Running
/cygdrive/e/Gcc/gcc-8-20180401/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/goacc.
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Probably my memory saving patch.
I'll investigate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85253
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Yep, looking at the code, it seems that in this special
case, we need one more row in the temporary buffer.
This seems to cure it.
Index: m4/matmul_internal.m4
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85253
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Apr 6 18:49:21 2018
New Revision: 259188
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259188&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-06 Thomas Koenig
PR libfortran/85253
* m4/ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85253
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82976
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> match.pd looks like it has a type bug:
> /* Simplify pointer equality compares using PTA. */
> (for neeq (ne eq)
> (simplify
> (neeq @0 @1)
> (if (POINTER
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
With r259211, clean trunk:
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/tkoenig/trunk-bin'
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82976
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Apr 7 23:52:03 2018
New Revision: 259212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-07 Thomas Koenig
Andrew Pinski
PR middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82976
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|DO CONCURRENT inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #17)
> > The original test case works fine with gcc-6 with multiple invocations,
> > so this is at least a gcc-8 regression.
>
> AFAICT the code is parallelize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |bootstrap
Summary|[8 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
This would reject the obvious non-contiguous cases.
Index: interface.c
===
--- interface.c (Revision 264540)
+++ interface.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Of course, there should be a "return false;" in there as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|2017-11-14
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's give this a shot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 44790
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44790&action=edit
This should take care of the library side...
or so I hope.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84640
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 6 11:45:05 2018
New Revision: 264898
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264898&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84640
* simplif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 84640, which changed state.
Bug 84640 Summary: gcc/fortran/simplify.c:2587:9: runtime error: pointer index
expression with base 0x090de160 overflowed to 0xc0632960
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84640
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 84109, which changed state.
Bug 84109 Summary: ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 87239, which changed state.
Bug 87239 Summary: ICE in deferred-length string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239
What|Removed |Added
--
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Also fixed. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 65677, which changed state.
Bug 65677 Summary: Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1901 - 2000 of 3746 matches
Mail list logo
