https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #30 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:27:11 2018
New Revision: 257603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257603&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68560
* trans-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80174
Bug 80174 depends on bug 68560, which changed state.
Bug 68560 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now
fails when compiled with -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649
Bug 68649 depends on bug 68560, which changed state.
Bug 68560 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now
fails when compiled with -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:48:32 2018
New Revision: 257604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257604&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68746
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:51:16 2018
New Revision: 257605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257605&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68746
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's keep this open to see if any platform develops a regression
with the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 77296, which changed state.
Bug 77296 Summary: [F03] Compiler Error with allocatable string and associate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71745
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77908
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
*** Bug 71745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Still fails with current trunk.
Code from comment#1, somewhat simplified:
program main
implicit none
integer:: i
integer, parameter:: N = 10
character(len=:), dimension(:),allocatable:: ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Feb 15 18:46:22 2018
New Revision: 257703
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257703&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-15 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84381
* gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|testsuite |fortran
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Neil Carlson from comment #5)
> Thomas, I saw you generated a patch with "stop n". I'd love to see how you
> did it -- the regexp and counting magic.
At first, I tried to find the all-inclusive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug 84094 depends on bug 84381, which changed state.
Bug 84381 Summary: replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran
testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Feb 17 15:53:07 2018
New Revision: 257783
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257783&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-17 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84270
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Feb 17 16:01:50 2018
New Revision: 257784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257784&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-17 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P3
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83898
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
r254157 is the culprit (r254156 is OK).
Just how this patch has caused this regression isn't quite
clear at first glance... I'll look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
The problem seems to be the simplifcation which gets the
string length wrong.
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||83497
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|83497 |83823
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:21:45 2018
New Revision: 257814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/35339
* fronten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:21:45 2018
New Revision: 257814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/35339
* fronten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
Bug 25829 depends on bug 35339, which changed state.
Bug 35339 Summary: Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Feb 20 18:57:34 2018
New Revision: 257856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-20 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/48890
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Feb 20 18:57:34 2018
New Revision: 257856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-20 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/48890
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 48890, which changed state.
Bug 48890 Summary: [F95] Wrong length of a character component of named
constant derived-type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823
Bug 83823 depends on bug 48890, which changed state.
Bug 48890 Summary: [F95] Wrong length of a character component of named
constant derived-type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82976
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
FWITW, here's a shorter test case:
PROGRAM main
TYPE :: test_typ
REAL, ALLOCATABLE :: a(:)
END TYPE
TYPE(test_typ) :: yy
TYPE(test_typ), ALLOCATABLE :: conc(:)
conc = [ yy ]
E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
This happened somewhere between r254362 (OK) and r254430 (not OK).
Bisection is running.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Reverting the resolve.c part of r254427 makes the problem go away.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84495
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's close it then.
Thanks for the bug report!
,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
I've done a bisection, and r255094 is the first revision that fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84495
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Feb 22 18:52:21 2018
New Revision: 257912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-22 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/81116
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81116
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Feb 22 18:52:21 2018
New Revision: 257912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-22 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/81116
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84495
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81116
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.sagan at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
The problem seems to be that gfc_conv_initalizer does not look
through
(gdb) p *expr
$1 = {expr_type = EXPR_STRUCTURE, ts = {type = BT_DERIVED, kind = 0,
to
(gdb) p *(expr->ts.u.derived->components->ts->u.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59781
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Feb 22 22:01:53 2018
New Revision: 257917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257917&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-22 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/59781
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59781
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Dup of 84412, which is going to be fixed, patch can be found at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-02/msg00121.html
*** This bug has been marked as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84412
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albandil at atlas dot cz
--- Comment #6
||2018-02-23
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Doesn't crash for me, but I get a valgrind
||2018-02-24
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|Array of derived type |[8 Regression] Array of
|elements incorrectly|derived type elements
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
_hash is an integer(4) in all cases:
$ gfortran -fdefault-integer-8 -fdump-fortran-original a.f90 2>/dev/null |
grep hash
(_hash (INTEGER 4) () PRIVATE)
(_hash (INTEGER 4) () PRIVATE)
$ gfort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Feb 25 09:02:32 2018
New Revision: 257968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-25 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78238
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Feb 25 09:30:04 2018
New Revision: 257969
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257969&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-25 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78238
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Not sure if this is a gdb or a gcc problem.
With gdb 8.0.1, stepping through functions after breakpoints is often
broken. This makes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
This is a rather old regression, r247548 already has it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> > This is a rather old regression, r247548 already has it.
>
> The change occurred between revisions r241509 (2016-10-25,OK) and r241635
> (2016-10-27, ST
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
I've assigned it to myself, with the understanding that
it may take some time before I do anything about this.
So, if an
||2018-03-02
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
This has to be one of the stranger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
This has to be some issue with the charlen - possibly a
default integer being used in the wrong place after r256322.
I don't usually build 32-bit-capable compilers on my home system
(too slow), let's see if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
On a big-endian system (gcc110), there are segfaults.
Looking into char_reshape_1.f90 yields
Breakpoint 1, _gfortran_reshape_char (ret=0xfffef130, ret_length=4294897968,
source=0x0, shape=0x9, pad=0xfffef1d8
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
According to your mail at (In reply to kargl from comment #10)
> Closing as fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-03/msg00010.html still shows a few
tests t
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Minloc and maxloc simplification are not yet done for zero-sized arrays.
Consider
$ cat minloc_zerosize_1.f90
program main
implicit none
integer, parameter :: z(0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
There is also a regression here:
$ cat a.f90
program main
implicit none
integer, parameter :: z(0) = 0
print *,minloc(z)
end program main
$ ./a.out
Fortran runtime error: Rank of array needs to be > 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid, wrong-code
Bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2013-11-26 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
This still segfaults:
ig25@linux-d6cw:/tmp> cat a.f90
implicit none
type Plane
integer :: M(1,1)
end type
type(Plane), parameter :: planes(1) = [ Plane(1) ]
integer:: f(1,
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 43560
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43560&action=edit
First attempt...
Well, here is something that fixes the first test case, at least.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Mar 6 23:50:01 2018
New Revision: 258305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84697
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Mar 6 23:50:01 2018
New Revision: 258305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84697
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Bug 66128 depends on bug 84697, which changed state.
Bug 84697 Summary: [8 Regression] minloc/maxloc not simplified with zero size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
What|Removed |Added
-
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
I'll take a look at what's left (maxval for strings, at least)
and fix what is necessary to fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's a problem with maxval:
$ cat maxval_parameter_2.f90
! { dg-do run }
program main
integer, dimension(0,3), parameter :: i = 0
integer, dimension(0,3) :: j = 0
print *,maxval(i,dim=1)
print *,m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 11 20:28:00 2018
New Revision: 258435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258435&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66128
* simplif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929
--- Comment #29 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 18 09:20:37 2018
New Revision: 258630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-18 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/79929
* gfortra
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
This is now correctly rejected:
ig25@flaemmli:/tmp> cat d.f90
program p
bind(c) :: x
call s(x)
end
ig25@flaemmli:/tmp> gfortran d.f90
d.f9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929
--- Comment #31 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #30)
> Fixed by revision r256284?
r256284 is OK, r256283 fails.
We cannot backport r256284 because this is the ABI change for
long string lengths.
So, this i
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #25 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #24)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #23)
> > Ok I see it.
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's see.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Mar 19 07:04:35 2018
New Revision: 258641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84931
* simplify
1801 - 1900 of 3746 matches
Mail list logo
