--- Comment #21 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 14:57
---
> As a side question, this PR has open some kind of Pandora box in which some
> failures are directly related to this PR, but probably many others are not.
> Would not it be wise to open a "
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 16:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=13999)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13999&action=view)
Patch (current status)
This patch is currently bootstrapping on my machine.
Let's see
--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 20:01
---
Subject: Bug 32858
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jul 29 20:01:45 2007
New Revision: 127049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127049
Log:
2007-07-29 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 20:01 ---
Subject: Bug 30814
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jul 29 20:01:45 2007
New Revision: 127049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127049
Log:
2007-07-29 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 32770
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32933
--- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-30 06:11
---
Fixed on trunk. Closing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32858
-fdefault-integer-8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot g
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 32770
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32938
--- Comment #22 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-30 21:06
---
Subject: Bug 32770
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jul 30 21:06:41 2007
New Revision: 127071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127071
Log:
2007-07-30 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 05:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14002)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14002&action=view)
proposed patch
This should fix it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32954
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 32770
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32954
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 06:00 ---
Setting to "enhancement", as we now detect the error
at runtime.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 18:49 ---
Even with the correction, the patch didn't pass regression-testing.
It's a good thing we do this.
I'll continue my investigations.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32954
--- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 19:21
---
Created an attachment (id=14003)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14003&action=view)
proposed patch (second try)
This one should be better. Currently regtesting.
--
tkoenig at gcc
--- Comment #15 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 20:44
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I still have the "Bus error". From the backtrace I think the culprit is
> libgfortran/intrinsics/pack_generic.c. Probably around the lines:
Hi Dominique,
I just commi
--- Comment #14 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 20:27
---
Subject: Bug 32954
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Aug 1 20:27:27 2007
New Revision: 127137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127137
Log:
2007-08-01 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-02 05:42 ---
Confirmed.
Paul, I'm putting you on the CC list because you fixed
PR 31994, the original conjg(transpose()) bug. Maybe
you can do something about this one :-)
Thomas
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org ch
--- Comment #20 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-02 17:17
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I have also had a look to the results of -fdump-tree-original and to the
> assembly with and without the flag, but did not see anything obvious.
This is very strange. spt
--- Comment #24 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-02 20:08
---
Subject: Bug 32770
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Aug 2 20:07:54 2007
New Revision: 127168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127168
Log:
2007-08-02 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #25 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-02 20:19
---
One additional thought.
When we add -fdefault-integer-8 to the testsuite (finally :-)
we should also add -fdeault-real-8 as well so the sizes
of integers and reals match in common blocks.
--
http
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-02 20:26 ---
If we use -fdefault-integer-8 on code which includes common
or equivalences, we should also include -fdefault-real-8.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-02 20:38 ---
Same place to ICE for bounds_check_5.f90.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32933
--- Comment #26 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 05:53
---
Subject: Bug 32770
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 3 05:52:52 2007
New Revision: 127178
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127178
Log:
2007-08-03 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 17:29 ---
*sigh*
Oh well, I broke it, so I'd better fix it.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 21:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=14018)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14018&action=view)
patch
This should fix it, and also provide at least some safeguards
against buffer overrun in case
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 21:12 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > *sigh*
>
> Yeah; I was thinking of organising a "non-C99 targets have to die *right*
> *now*" day, would you join me? ;-)
Of c
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 22:10 ---
Fixed, closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 22:09 ---
Subject: Bug 32977
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 3 22:09:10 2007
New Revision: 127187
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127187
Log:
2007-08-03 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #27 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-04 18:21
---
Subject: Bug 32770
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 4 18:20:54 2007
New Revision: 127210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127210
Log:
2007-08-04 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
riority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 32770
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32989
--- Comment #28 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-04 20:14
---
Subject: Bug 32770
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 4 20:14:26 2007
New Revision: 127212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127212
Log:
2007-08-04 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 19:14 ---
Right now, I'd rather work on something else.
Unassigning myself (for now, at least).
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 20:58 ---
Hi FX,
I just thought you'd like to be in the loop for this one.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 20:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=14051)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14051&action=view)
partial patch
Partial patch (doesn't yet remove the conversion of logical(kind=1)
and logical(
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-11 20:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=14055)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14055&action=view)
proposed patch
Here's a patch, which is currently regtesting.
We'll absolutely need to ch
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 11:05 ---
> Thomas, any opinion on that?
The arguments to random_seed are restricted to default
integer, at least up to F 2003, so we should just reject anything else.
We'd then need two versions of random_seed fo
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 11:19 ---
> So, since it's just shuffling bytes (and it's a bijective operation, of
> course), I don't think I'm messing with any of the properties of the
> generator.
I concur. It might
n
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 32770
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33055
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
BugsThisDependsOn: 25096,31244,32315,32331,32928
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-16 18:16 ---
Hi Dominique,
would you be willing to give the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00295.html
a spin on your Mac to check whether this is OK? That would
be great, because I don't have a big-e
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 18:28 ---
Some discussion is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-04/msg00115.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30625
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-24 16:16 ---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 24 16:16:16 2007
New Revision: 127774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127774
Log:
2007-08-24 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #17 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-26 11:24
---
Changing severity to enhancement.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-29 19:02 ---
Hi Jerry,
what was the problem?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33055
rity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33253
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 21:03 ---
This one should be fairly straightforward.
Mine :-)
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 19:25
---
Subject: Bug 33298
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Sep 6 19:25:30 2007
New Revision: 128206
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128206
Log:
2007-09-06 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 21:23
---
Fixed on trunk. Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33341
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-08 07:16 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-08 07:19 ---
Confirmed.
Traceback:
#0 integer_onep (expr=0x0) at ../../../gcc/trunk/gcc/tree.c:1337
#1 0x080d0513 in gfc_conv_loop_setup (loop=0xbff16814)
at ../../../gcc/trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:3250
#2
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-08 11:32 ---
An equivalent C testcase eliminates the array stores:
int foo(int *a,int *b,int *c,int *d)
{
int val[3];
val[0] = *a;
val[1] = *b;
val[2] = *c;
return (val[0] != *d) && (val[1] != *d) &
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-08 11:40 ---
Confirmed.
Backtrace:
(gdb) b fancy_abort
Breakpoint 1 at 0x817cfe0: file ../../../gcc/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c, line 654.
(gdb) r mm.f90
Starting program: /home/ig25/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.0/f951 mm.f90
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 32834
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33370
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 20:03 ---
Reduced testcase due to Paul Thomas:
$ cat > goo.f90
program main
type foo
integer :: i
character(len=3) :: c
end type foo
type(foo), dimension(4), target :: a
a%i = (/ 12, 2, 3, 10 /)
print *
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 15:31 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 13:12 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I added a testcase for this.
Thanks!
> Can this bug be closed or does anyone feel
> strongly enough about it to fix it in 4.2?
If we can identify which patch fixed this, I'
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-30 21:03 ---
I am currently trying to find the patch responsible
for fixing this. This could indeed be Paul's
fix for PR 32298 and 31726.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33354
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 18:09 ---
I can confirm that
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125983
fixes the problem for 4.2. As this is a particularly
bad (i.e. silent wrong-code) bug, I propose to commit
Paul's patch onc
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 18:51 ---
This may work:
$ svn diff
Index: resolve.c
===
--- resolve.c (revision 128885)
+++ resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -6563,7 +6563,7 @@ resolve_charlen
--- Comment #22 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 20:36
---
This is hard to debug without access to a big-endian
machine. Renaming, unapplying myself.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 20:27 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 20:26 ---
Subject: Bug 33539
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Oct 4 20:26:24 2007
New Revision: 129022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129022
Log:
2007-10-04 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-06 21:36 ---
For once, the segfault is in the
gfortran driver, not the f951 binary.
Backtrace, plus some more debug info:
$ gdb ~/bin/gfortran
GNU gdb 6.6.90.20070912-debian
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc
: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33683
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 10:22 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I checked and the simplification routines work correctly, which means there is
> no real testsuite coverage for these functions. We should always include
> testcases compari
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 16:48 ---
This fixes things at least on my system; this also
passes regression-testing.
Index: mathbuiltins.def
===
--- mathbuiltins.def(revision 129050
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 21:36 ---
Subject: Bug 33683
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 7 21:36:09 2007
New Revision: 129116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129116
Log:
2007-10-07 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 21:45 ---
Fixed.
Let's close this and watch for occurences of
gamma_5.f90 failing, then open a new bug report
if that happens.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 33683
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Oct 9 20:13:18 2007
New Revision: 129174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129174
Log:
2007-10-09 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 20:22 ---
We'll probably need to roll our own tgamma function: To
cover cases like this, where the system doesn't provide
one, and to get numerically better answers.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot o
--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-15 18:23
---
Subject: Bug 31726
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Oct 15 18:23:39 2007
New Revision: 129365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129365
Log:
2007-10-25 Thomas Koenig <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-15 18:23
---
Subject: Bug 33354
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Oct 15 18:23:39 2007
New Revision: 129365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129365
Log:
2007-10-25 Thomas Koenig <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-15 18:23 ---
Subject: Bug 32298
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Oct 15 18:23:39 2007
New Revision: 129365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129365
Log:
2007-10-25 Thomas Koenig <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-15 18:24
---
Fixed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-20 10:06 ---
Mine.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-20 10:17
---
I am tempted not to use gamma*() at all, but rather
check for tgamma*() and lgamma*() and use that
if available. If none of them are present, use
a fallback implementation.
This avoids potential problems with
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
19:18 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19106 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
19:18 ---
*** Bug 20832 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
22:19 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Isn't this related to or at least a dup of bug 19101?
A different bug because a different provision of the standard
is violated. Probably, a meta-bug "parser-relate
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09
20:32 ---
Updated patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00214.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19106
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09
20:33 ---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00214.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09
20:38 ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00100.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:23 ---
Waiting for the 4.0 branch to reopen to apply there.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:24 ---
Waiting for the 4.0 branch to reopen to apply there.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:37 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for inclusion into 4.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:38 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:39 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:40 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:41 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:41 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:44 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Subject: Bug 20138
Whoops, an erroneous entry in the Changelog here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20138
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:44 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
08:45 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.0.0
401 - 500 of 1518 matches
Mail list logo
