[Bug fortran/30321] program crash for SUM applied to zero-size array

2007-01-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 23:13 --- Subject: Bug 30321 Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Jan 9 23:13:42 2007 New Revision: 120623 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120623 Log: 2007-01-08 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug libfortran/30415] MINLOC, MAXLOC missing for integer kinds 1 and 2

2007-01-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 20:32 --- Subject: Bug 30415 Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Jan 11 20:32:42 2007 New Revision: 120685 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120685 Log: 2007-01-11 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/30389] ACHAR() intrinsic gives erroneous errors in constant-folding.

2007-01-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 20:55 --- We should be consistent to program main integer :: i i = 154 print *,achar(i) end program main Confirmed. I'll do this. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Re

[Bug fortran/30452] New: Strange syntax error with high-value character

2007-01-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
ortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org OtherBugsDependingO 19292 nThis: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30452

[Bug fortran/30452] Strange syntax error with high-value character

2007-01-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 11:01 --- Subject: Bug 30452 Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Jan 14 11:01:20 2007 New Revision: 120768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120768 Log: 2007-01-14 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/30452] [4.2, 4.1 only] Strange syntax error with high-value character

2007-01-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-15 20:27 --- Fixed on trunk, will backport to 4.2 in a week or so. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/30415] MINLOC, MAXLOC missing for integer kinds 1 and 2

2007-01-18 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 21:57 --- Subject: Bug 30415 Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Jan 18 21:56:53 2007 New Revision: 120932 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120932 Log: 2007-01-18 Thomas Koenig <[EMAI

[Bug libfortran/30415] MINLOC, MAXLOC missing for integer kinds 1 and 2

2007-01-18 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 21:58 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.2. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30389] ACHAR() intrinsic gives erroneous errors in constant-folding.

2007-01-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 21:35 --- In order to fix this, we should know what we would prefer :-) Constant folding maps a lot of characters (all ASCII characters > 127, and a lot of control characters) to zero. In the rest of the library, we tr

[Bug fortran/30321] program crash for SUM applied to zero-size array

2007-01-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 22:38 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.2. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/30525] New: character comparisons with padding

2007-01-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org OtherB

[Bug libfortran/30525] character comparisons with padding

2007-01-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 11:31 --- A signed issue in compare_string. I'll also have to check front end constant folding for this... -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |

[Bug libfortran/30525] character comparisons with padding

2007-01-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 18:02 --- Here's a patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01726.html Constant folding by the front end is OK, BTW. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30525

[Bug libfortran/30525] character comparisons with padding

2007-01-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 20:52 --- Subject: Bug 30525 Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Jan 21 20:51:53 2007 New Revision: 121035 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121035 Log: 2007-01-21 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/30531] ICE in fold_convert

2007-01-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 21:56 --- Actually, there is no attachment :-) Could you send it, please? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30531

[Bug fortran/30532] New: ^Z as EOF?

2007-01-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
Summary: ^Z as EOF? Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoen

[Bug libfortran/30533] New: minval, maxval missing for kind=1 and kind=2

2007-01-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30533

[Bug fortran/30532] ^Z as EOF?

2007-01-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 19:18 --- (In reply to comment #2) scriptors (10.2.1). > > The following patch allows the test case in #1 to compile: Looks good (and I agree with the reasoning). Will you submit the patch? Thomas -- t

<    11   12   13   14   15   16