[Bug fortran/20935] failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2006-02-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-25 14:26 --- *** Bug 26182 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/26182] (min|max)loc with scalar mask aborts at runtime

2006-02-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-25 14:26 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20935 *** -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25045] [4.1 only] DIM argument of PRODUCT is not optional

2006-02-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-26 19:21 --- After Tobi's fix for the regression the original patch introduced, this now works on trunk. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |

[Bug fortran/25031] Allocatable array can be reallocated.

2006-03-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 16:18 --- Subject: Bug 25031 Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Mar 3 16:18:46 2006 New Revision: 111677 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111677 Log: 2006-03-03 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT

2006-03-04 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 22:21 --- Subject: Bug 25075 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 4 22:21:52 2006 New Revision: 111718 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111718 Log: 2006-03-04 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/25045] [4.1 only] DIM argument of PRODUCT is not optional

2006-03-04 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 22:21 --- Subject: Bug 25045 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 4 22:21:52 2006 New Revision: 111718 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111718 Log: 2006-03-04 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/25045] [4.1 only] DIM argument of PRODUCT is not optional

2006-03-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-05 18:35 --- Fixed on 4.1 as well. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25075] [4.1 only] array size mismatch in DOT_PRODUCT

2006-03-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-05 18:36 --- Fixed on 4.1 as well. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/23092] [4.1 only] scalar mask for minval/maxval/sum/product

2006-03-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-05 20:03 --- Subject: Bug 23092 Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Mar 5 20:03:08 2006 New Revision: 111742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111742 Log: 2006-03-05 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/23092] [4.1 only] scalar mask for minval/maxval/sum/product

2006-03-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-05 20:03 --- Fixed on 4.1. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20935] failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2006-03-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 22:33 --- Created an attachment (id=10987) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10987&action=view) partial patch This is a partial proof-of-concept patch that only deals with minloc. The test should be

[Bug fortran/20935] failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2006-03-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 23:07 --- Created an attachment (id=11019) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11019&action=view) More complete patch Here's a more complete patch, which should do the Right Thing. -- tkoeni

[Bug libfortran/19303] Unformatted record header is 4-bytes on 32-bit targets

2006-03-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 17:53 --- I'll take this, implementing the simplistic approach (generating an error for >2GB record sizes). This should keep the complexity down. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug libfortran/26735] New: -fconvert=swap and implied open

2006-03-17 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26735

[Bug fortran/20618] Variable format expressions not supported

2006-03-17 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 21:12 --- Following the discussion on comp.lang.fortran on this subject, I'm tempted to mark this WONTFIX. This feature can cause a lot of headaches to implement and is of questionable semantics. Any objec

[Bug fortran/26769] TRANSPOSE() requires _gfortran_transpose_i10 for REAL(10) arrays

2006-03-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 19:33 --- Same for reshape, as noted on the mailing list. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/26769] TRANSPOSE() requires _gfortran_transpose_i10 for REAL(10) arrays

2006-03-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 20:13 --- The way to solve is is to add transpose_r_10.c and reshape_r_10.c to libgfortran's Makefile.am, then regenerating (which I am always a little afraid of :-) and modifying the front end to call the 'r&#

[Bug fortran/20935] failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2006-03-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 21:56 --- Subject: Bug 20935 Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Mar 20 21:56:00 2006 New Revision: 112230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112230 Log: 2006-03-20 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/26769] TRANSPOSE() requires _gfortran_transpose_i10 for REAL(10) arrays

2006-03-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug libfortran/19303] Unformatted record header is 4-bytes on 32-bit targets

2006-03-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 19:09 --- Subject: Bug 19303 Author: tkoenig Date: Wed Mar 22 19:09:11 2006 New Revision: 112290 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112290 Log: 2006-03-22 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/26769] TRANSPOSE() requires _gfortran_transpose_i10 for REAL(10) arrays

2006-03-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 20:06 --- Created an attachment (id=11099) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11099&action=view) patch This patch adds the appropriate _r10 versions. It also includes the reversal of automake to 1.9.3

[Bug fortran/25031] Allocatable array can be reallocated.

2006-03-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-23 18:36 --- There is a problem with the current solution on trunk. When we do allocate (a(10)) allocate (a(20),stat=i) the size information is changed, but the size of the array is not. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/26769] TRANSPOSE() requires _gfortran_transpose_i10 for REAL(10) arrays

2006-03-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 21:15 --- Subject: Bug 26769 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 25 21:15:48 2006 New Revision: 112381 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112381 Log: 2006-03-25 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug libfortran/26735] -fconvert=swap and implied open

2006-03-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 21:31 --- Subject: Bug 26735 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Mar 25 21:31:48 2006 New Revision: 112382 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112382 Log: 2006-03-25 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug libfortran/26735] [4.1 only] -fconvert=swap and implied open

2006-03-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 21:53 --- Fixed on trunk. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary

[Bug fortran/26769] TRANSPOSE() requires _gfortran_transpose_i10 for REAL(10) arrays

2006-03-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 21:54 --- Fixed on trunk. There is general agreement that reshape and transpose should also have their corresponding real types, so let's keep this bug open as a reminder. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug fortran/26822] Scalarization of non-elemental intrinsic: __logical_4_l4

2006-03-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 22:01 --- Reduced test case: program main logical, dimension(2) :: mask1, mask2 mask2 = logical(mask1) end program main Unless I miss something, the logical is a no-op. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed

[Bug fortran/20618] Variable format expressions not supported

2006-03-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 22:21 --- As agreed on the mailing list, I'm closing this as WONTFIX. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |

[Bug libfortran/25378] [Fortran 2003] maxloc for all-false mask

2006-03-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 20:05 --- Subject: Bug 25378 Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Mar 27 20:05:24 2006 New Revision: 112425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112425 Log: 2006-03-27 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/20935] failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2006-03-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 20:05 --- Subject: Bug 20935 Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Mar 27 20:05:24 2006 New Revision: 112425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112425 Log: 2006-03-27 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/20935] failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2006-03-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 19:29 --- Fixed on 4.1. Closing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20935

[Bug fortran/20935] failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2006-03-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 19:30 --- Really closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/25378] [Fortran 2003] maxloc for all-false mask

2006-03-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 19:31 --- Fixed on 4.1. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25031] Allocatable array can be reallocated.

2006-03-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 16:30 --- Subject: Bug 25031 Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Mar 30 16:30:26 2006 New Revision: 112539 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112539 Log: 2006-03-30 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug libfortran/19303] [4.1 only] Unformatted record header is 4-bytes on 32-bit targets

2006-03-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 21:13 --- Subject: Bug 19303 Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Mar 31 21:13:46 2006 New Revision: 112590 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112590 Log: PR fortran/19303 Backport from

[Bug libfortran/19303] [4.1 only] Unformatted record header is 4-bytes on 32-bit targets

2006-03-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 21:24 --- Fixed on 4.1. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/26735] [4.1 only] -fconvert=swap and implied open

2006-04-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-01 20:08 --- Subject: Bug 26735 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Apr 1 20:08:39 2006 New Revision: 112609 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112609 Log: 2006-04-01 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug libfortran/26735] [4.1 only] -fconvert=swap and implied open

2006-04-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-01 20:09 --- Also fixed on 4.1. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/26985] incorrect matmul result

2006-04-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-02 18:41 --- The test case also exposes a problem with the way that the result is stored. Look at this: $ cat matmul.f90 program main implicit none real(8) :: a(2,9), b(9,7), c(2,7) integer :: i, j a = 1.d0 b = 2.d0

[Bug libfortran/26985] incorrect matmul result

2006-04-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-02 19:21 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The test case also exposes a problem with the way that > the result is stored. Actually, it doesn't. Storing the result is OK, clearing beforehand isn't. -- ht

[Bug fortran/25031] [4.1 only] Allocatable array can be reallocated.

2006-04-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 17:05 --- Subject: Bug 25031 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Apr 8 17:05:52 2006 New Revision: 112783 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112783 Log: 2006-04-08 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Bug fortran/25031] [4.1 only] Allocatable array can be reallocated.

2006-04-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 17:06 --- Fixed on 4.1. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18857] MATMUL failing with ALLOCATED matrices, unless base indices given

2005-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19 18:51 --- descriptor.offset (in the front end) aka descriptor->base in the library is currently useless. Look at this: $ cat offset.f90 program main real :: a(2,2) real, allocatable :: b(:,:) real, poin

[Bug libfortran/21108] New: reshape with order causes memory corruption

2005-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
ses memory corruption Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug libfortran/21127] New: reshape of complex broken

2005-04-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21127

[Bug libfortran/21108] [4.0 only] reshape with order causes random results

2005-04-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 18:09 --- > I think you copy/pasted the wrong "working" testcase. Yes, I did :-( Here is a corrected version. $ gfortran reshape-0.f90 $ ./a.out Aborted $ cat reshape-0.f90 ! { dg-do run } ! Thi

[Bug libfortran/21127] reshape of complex broken

2005-04-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 18:26 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Or, alternatively, we could call reshape_generic. Which of course would be > evil > from a performance standpoitn :-) Actually, that's what we are doing for a lot

[Bug libfortran/20436] [4.0 only] using nested reshape functions gives runtime error

2005-04-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 Known to work||4.1.0 Summary|usring nested reshape |[4

[Bug fortran/19015] shape / rank mismatch in maxloc / minloc leads to assertion failure at runtime

2005-04-28 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 08:07 --- In 4.1, this is now a runtime error: $ cat maxloc-2.f90 integer, dimension(0:1,0:1) :: n integer, dimension(1) :: i n = reshape((/1, 2, 3, 4/), shape(n)) i = maxloc(n) print *,i end program

[Bug tree-optimization/21266] New: verify_ssa failed

2005-04-28 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
ion: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-b

[Bug libfortran/20074] [4.0 only] reshape of pointer array segfaults at runtime

2005-04-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-29 07:29 --- Fixed in 4.1, should be merged with 4.0 -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail

[Bug tree-optimization/21278] New: Move maximum out of a loop

2005-04-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21278

[Bug libfortran/21324] New: #undef GFC_CLEAR_MEMORY causes testsuite failures

2005-05-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
tsuite failures Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-

[Bug libfortran/21333] New: in_pack / in_unpack alignment issues

2005-05-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21333

[Bug libfortran/21324] #undef GFC_CLEAR_MEMORY causes testsuite failures

2005-05-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 11:58 --- Filling allocated memory with garbage is even more fun, this causes around 3000 testsuite failures. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21324

[Bug libfortran/21324] #undef GFC_CLEAR_MEMORY causes testsuite failures

2005-05-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 14:29 --- Created an attachment (id=8801) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8801&action=view) Proposed patch -- What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/18958] [4.0 only] eoshift segfaults when shifting off the end of an array

2005-05-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 Known to work||4.1.0 Summary|eoshift segfaults when |[4

[Bug libfortran/21324] #undef GFC_CLEAR_MEMORY causes testsuite failures

2005-05-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 06:52 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-05/msg00016.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 20224, which changed state. Bug 20224 Summary: gfortran - flags error on strange, but correct f66 program http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20224 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug fortran/20224] gfortran - flags error on strange, but correct f66 program

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 07:04 --- Resolving as WONTFIX, as agreed. There realy isn't a good reason to support this. Thomas -- What|Removed |

[Bug libfortran/21127] reshape of complex broken

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 08:23 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00716.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/21354] New: Rank 7 not handled correctly

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
correctly Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu

[Bug libfortran/19595] [4.0 only] eor does not work

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:45 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20005] [4.0 only] reading a single "return" character fails

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:46 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20092] [4.0 only] console input doesn't deal correctly with CR

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:47 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 20092, which changed state. Bug 20092 Summary: [4.0 only] console input doesn't deal correctly with CR http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/20131] [4.0 only] gfortan - incorrectly reads beyond the end of line.

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:47 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20661] [4.0 only] End of record not detected

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:48 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20661

[Bug libfortran/17992] [4.0 only] reading empty line does not return 0

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:49 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17992

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 20108, which changed state. Bug 20108 Summary: [4.0 only] incorrect run time error on formatted read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20108 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug libfortran/20108] [4.0 only] incorrect run time error on formatted read

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:49 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/19568] [4.0 only] incorrect formatted read

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:51 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20661] [4.0 only] End of record not detected

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 20661 depends on bug 19568, which changed state. Bug 19568 Summary: [4.0 only] incorrect formatted read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19568 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/19595] [4.0 only] eor does not work

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 19595 depends on bug 19568, which changed state. Bug 19568 Summary: [4.0 only] incorrect formatted read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19568 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/19595] [4.0 only] eor does not work

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 19595 depends on bug 20661, which changed state. Bug 20661 Summary: [4.0 only] End of record not detected http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20661 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug libfortran/20661] [4.0 only] End of record not detected

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:51 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/17992] [4.0 only] reading empty line does not return 0

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:51 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 17992, which changed state. Bug 17992 Summary: [4.0 only] reading empty line does not return 0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17992 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/20744] [4.0 only] size= isn't implemented correctly

2005-05-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:52 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/21354] [4.0 only] Rank 7 not handled correctly

2005-05-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-06 07:30 --- Fixed in 4.1, still needs to be applied to 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo

[Bug libfortran/18958] [4.0 only] eoshift segfaults when shifting off the end of an array

2005-05-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-07 19:49 --- Fixed in the 4.0 branch. Closing. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/21468] New: vectorizing libfortran

2005-05-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org CC:

[Bug fortran/21470] New: mark subroutine arguments __restrict__

2005-05-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
NCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug fortran/21470] mark subroutine arguments __restrict__

2005-05-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21470

[Bug libfortran/21324] #undef GFC_CLEAR_MEMORY causes testsuite failures

2005-05-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-12 19:12 --- Fixed in mainline and 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/21565] New: namelist in block data is illegal

2005-05-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
ostic Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21565

[Bug libfortran/21333] in_pack / in_unpack alignment issues

2005-05-17 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17 13:25 --- For ia-64, this can be exposed with prctl: $ gfortran packtest.f90 $ prctl --unaligned=signal gdb ./a.out GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.1post-1.20040607.52rh) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB

[Bug fortran/21432] gfortran does not support printing of namelists

2005-05-17 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17 13:32 --- (In reply to comment #3) > The bug is that gfortran apparently does not support printing of namelists. I > don't know if this is in the fortran standard or not, but it is a very common

[Bug libfortran/21127] reshape of complex broken

2005-05-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 22:10 --- Fixed on mainline and 4.0. There are still some reshape bugs in 4.0 which are not specific to complex numbers, and whose fixes need to be backported. -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/21594] FAIL: gfortran.dg/eoshift.f90 -O0 execution test

2005-05-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 22:22 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I have no idea why it would only fail at -O0 though, the .original dump on > i586-linux looks fine, and there's nothing strongly system specific in it. This may b

[Bug libfortran/19016] [4.0 only] maxloc ignores mask

2005-05-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-20 22:52 --- Fixed in 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20074] [4.0 only] reshape of pointer array segfaults at runtime

2005-05-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 20:29 --- Fixed in 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/21108] [4.0 only] reshape with order causes random results

2005-05-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 20:30 --- Fixed in 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20436] [4.0 only] using nested reshape functions gives runtime error

2005-05-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 20:31 --- Fixed in 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/18495] [4.0 only] Intrinisc function SPREAD is broken

2005-05-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 20:34 --- Fixed in 4.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18495

[Bug libfortran/19872] [4.0 only] closed and re-opened file not overwriten

2005-05-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 20:34 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/17283] UNPACK issues

2005-05-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23 16:00 --- Looks like there is another memory allocation issue: $ cat unpack.f90 program main real, dimension(5) :: a a = (/(real(i),i=1,5)/) print *, unpack(a(:), a(:)>0, 0.) end $ gfortran unpack.

[Bug libfortran/21075] [4.0 only] Segfault in reshape with rank 7

2005-05-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2.1&r2=1.5.12.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/generated/reshape_i8.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.5.12.1&r2=1.5.12.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/generated/sum_c4.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&

[Bug libfortran/21354] [4.0 only] Rank 7 not handled correctly

2005-05-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23 20:05 --- Fixed in 4.0. Closing. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/17031] Cray pointers not supported

2005-05-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23 20:10 --- According to a discussion on the fortran mailing list, some initial work seems to have been done: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00071.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

<    9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >