--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-22 21:56 ---
Subject: Bug 36302
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu May 22 21:55:43 2008
New Revision: 135777
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135777
Log:
2008-05-22 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-22 21:59 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 20:03 ---
This should be fun :-)
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 20:08 ---
This works for me down to 4.1.3:
$ gfortran-4.1 -static foo.f
$ ./a.out
$ head -4 fort.10
0.99950656E+00 0.31410759E-01 0.99950656E+00 0.31410759E-01
0.99802673E+00 0.62790520E-01 0.99802673E+00
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-04 19:06 ---
No time for now (Real Time is catching up with me big time).
Unassigning (for now).
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-04 19:06 ---
No time for now (Real Time is catching up with me big time).
Unassigning (for now).
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36458
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-07 19:24 ---
I didn't compile it that way myself; those are testsuite failures.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-12 18:16 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> As PR 36471 shows, building libgfortran's Fortran parts with -fimplicit-none
> can help detecting programming errors in the Fortran written parts of
> libgfortran.
>
&
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-12 18:20 ---
This is an instance of PR 34670.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
\n for generated *.s files on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gn
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-23 21:28 ---
We should probably set the shape for
arguments of known shape in gfc_resolve_matmul.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-28 07:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=15822)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15822&action=view)
compile-time patch
This patch works for compile-time, and passes
all *matmul* regression tests.
--
--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-28 20:37
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Should not
>
> + mpz_init_set (f->shape[0], a->shape[1]);
>
> be
>
> + mpz_init_set (f->shape[0], a->shape[0]);
>
Yes, it should
--- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 19:06
---
Subject: Bug 36341
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jun 29 19:06:06 2008
New Revision: 137255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137255
Log:
2008-06-29 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 27766
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36670
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||34670
nThis
--- Comment #13 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 06:54
---
Fixed for compile-time.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 12:34 ---
I caused this.
Here's an obvious patch:
Index: iresolve.c
===
--- iresolve.c (revision 137255)
+++ iresolve.c (working copy)
@@ -106,7 +
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 14:38 ---
Subject: Bug 36681
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jul 2 14:36:58 2008
New Revision: 137355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137355
Log:
2008-07-02 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 14:38 ---
Subject: Bug 36590
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jul 2 14:36:58 2008
New Revision: 137355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137355
Log:
2008-07-02 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 14:40 ---
Fixed. Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 14:41 ---
Fixed. Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-03 21:17 ---
(gdb) b fancy_abort
Breakpoint 1 at 0x819c390: file ../../../gcc/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c, line 653.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/ig25/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.0/f951
diatoms.f90
finddiatomicperiod
--- Comment #14 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-03 21:19
---
run-time patch posted.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 19:44 ---
Subject: Bug 34670
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jul 7 19:43:33 2008
New Revision: 137594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137594
Log:
2008-07-07 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #15 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 19:44
---
Subject: Bug 36341
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jul 7 19:43:33 2008
New Revision: 137594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137594
Log:
2008-07-07 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 19:46 ---
Subject: Bug 36670
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jul 7 19:45:55 2008
New Revision: 137595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137595
Log:
2008-07-07 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #16 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 19:47
---
Fixed both for compile-time and run-time on trunk.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 19:48 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 19:51 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-09 14:49 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > b = a(1:12)
> > Error: Different shape for array assignment at (1) on dimension 1 (1 and 12)
> > ? I don't have that many patches left.
>
> Hmm, I cur
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-09 15:31 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I am not sure the code is valid.
It's not, as -fbounds-check will tell you:
$ gfortran -fbounds-check foo.f90
$ ./a.out
At line 15 of file foo.f90
Fortran runtime error: Arr
: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36773
: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
BugsThisDependsOn: 36841
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-16 18:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=15917)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15917&action=view)
proposed patch
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-16 18:51 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=15917)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15917&action=view) [edit]
> proposed patch
... which doesn't work in all cases. S
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-16 21:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=15918)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15918&action=view)
better patch
This one actually works for eoshift and passes
all zero* and *shift* tests in gfor
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 10:06 ---
Subject: Bug 36773
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jul 21 10:05:32 2008
New Revision: 138027
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138027
Log:
2008-07-21 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 10:08 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
"
(gdb)
--
Summary: misaligment for cshift of character
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassig
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 21:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=15936)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15936&action=view)
patch for compile-time check
This passes regression-tests, make info and make dvi.
All that's
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 08:30 ---
This is caused by
static const unsigned int READ_CHUNK = 4096;
and, further down,
n = (base < READ_CHUNK) ? base : READ_CHUNK;
where base is a gfc_offset (a signed quantity).
The "unsigned" i
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 10:27 ---
Subject: Bug 36890
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jul 22 10:27:10 2008
New Revision: 138050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138050
Log:
2008-07-22 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 10:29 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 11:58 ---
Related to PR 32972 (optimizing cshift the way that other
array intrinsics have been done will cure this).
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 12:30 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Proposed patch passed regression test on i686-pc-linux-gnu..
Patch is approved (or obvious and simple, whatever you prefer :-)
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org chan
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-24 09:27 ---
Subject: Bug 29952
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jul 24 09:26:43 2008
New Revision: 138112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138112
Log:
2008-07-24 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36928
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 08:15 ---
This works now, with the fixes for matmul bounds checks
(PR 36341):
$ cat mat.f90
program mat
implicit none
complex, allocatable :: a(:,:),b(:,:)
complex :: d(1,1)
allocate(a(4,1),b(4,1))
a
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 13:04 ---
Confirmed.
I knew I was opening a can of worms with that option :-)
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 13:05 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 13:06 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 16:55 ---
Can't confirm right now, but this might be a suspect (at
least it is recent enough):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-07/msg00833.html
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 21:21 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> New status, I did update my other tree (unpatched) to the latest SVN, and
> couldn't reproduce the problem there.
I tried the same with an unpatched tree.
Philip: Could y
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 10:31 ---
Subject: Bug 36934
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jul 26 10:30:50 2008
New Revision: 138167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138167
Log:
2008-07-26 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 10:31 ---
Test case added, closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 20:28 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-27 19:28 ---
The test case now correctly complains about
an unneeded temporary:
$ gfortran -Warray-temporaries foo.f90
foo.f90:5.8:
foo = all((/ a, b, c /) /= d)
1
Warning: Creating array temporary at (1
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 09:46 ---
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ArrayDescriptorUpdate
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 09:52 ---
Another test case:
$ cat foo.f90
program main
real, dimension(2,2) :: a
real, dimension(2) :: b
call random_number(a)
b = sum(a,dim=1) + 0.4
end program main
$ gfortran -Warray-temporaries foo.f90
foo.f90
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 10:38 ---
No temporary is done if the first argument of the
matmul intrinsic is a (3,3) array.
Interesting.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 10:38 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 10:48 ---
Why a run-time check?
AFAIK, we can always determine the rank at runtime, so unless somebody messes
with our array descriptors big time, we should be safe.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #24 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 11:38
---
Is this still an issue after the tuples merge?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36806
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-02 23:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=16000)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16000&action=view)
proposed patch for cshift0
Here's something that works for cshift0.
cshift1 still to do...
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-02 23:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=16001)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16001&action=view)
better patch
This one is better :-)
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-03 09:22 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > Created an attachment (id=16001)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16001&action=view) [edit]
> > better patch
>
> I think some of the run-t
--- Comment #29 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 20:40
---
Updated patch, which also implements a compile-time option.
Hopefully, this will be reviewed some day.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 21:17
---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Created an attachment (id=10564)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10564&action=view) [edit]
> patch against gcc-4.1-20051223
>
> As requested,
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-28 18:49 ---
This one is a bit tricky, because the code would
be legal (if memory-leaking) for if a were a pointer.
Also, using a stat variable is supposed to catch this.
Seems like we need a new function for allocating
zero-sized array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 23:25 ---
Good idea.
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 23:30
---
Should we mark this as WONTFIX?
I'm in favor.
Thomas
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22495
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 23:45 ---
This is MUCH faster now on 4.2.0:
Can we close this?
(My guess is that this was fixed by the write_only patch
by Richard Guenther).
$ gdb ~/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0/f951
GNU gdb 6.4-debian
Copyright
--- Comment #14 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 06:44
---
Closing, then.
Thomas
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26025
.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26039
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 23:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=10764)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10764&action=view)
patch
Same problem (lack of check) with min/maxloc, product and sum, although
with different
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 22:52 ---
Subject: Bug 26039
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 31 22:52:49 2006
New Revision: 110453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110453
Log:
2006-01-31 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 22:04 ---
This is now caught on trunk, since revision 110453 (I had overlooked
this PR when fixing this).
Thomas
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 22:12 ---
Subject: Bug 25075
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Feb 4 22:11:57 2006
New Revision: 110596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110596
Log:
2006-02-04 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 00:14 ---
Subject: Bug 25046
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Feb 5 00:14:37 2006
New Revision: 110600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110600
Log:
2006-02-04 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 00:14 ---
Subject: Bug 26039
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Feb 5 00:14:37 2006
New Revision: 110600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110600
Log:
2006-02-04 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 00:16 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1. Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 00:19 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1. Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #30 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 20:12
---
Subject: Bug 23815
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 6 20:12:44 2006
New Revision: 110664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110664
Log:
2005-02-06 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 20:33 ---
Note that http://www.netlib.org/blas/d1mach.f has code
INTEGER SMALL(2)
INTEGER LARGE(2)
INTEGER RIGHT(2)
INTEGER DIVER(2)
INTEGER LOG10(2)
INTEGER SC, CRAY1(38), J
COMMON
--- Comment #31 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 20:14
---
Subject: Bug 23815
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Feb 8 20:14:00 2006
New Revision: 110764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110764
Log:
2005-02-08 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #32 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 20:15
---
Fixed on 4.1 as well.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary: setting environment variables in test cases
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoeni
--- Comment #34 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 20:03
---
(In reply to comment #33)
Hi Tobi,
> I'm seeing the following failure on the trunk:
> Running /home/pcl331/schluter/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/unf_io_conv
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-11 21:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=10824)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10824&action=view)
patch for product
Here's a patch for the product/sum case. minval/maxval could
be fixed along th
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 19:25 ---
Subject: Bug 25045
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:25:36 2006
New Revision: 110994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110994
Log:
2006-02-14 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 22:21 ---
Fixed on trunk, waiting for 4.1 to reopen.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-25 10:32 ---
Subject: Bug 23092
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Feb 25 10:32:19 2006
New Revision: 111438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111438
Log:
2006-02-25 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
1201 - 1300 of 1518 matches
Mail list logo
