++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com
Created attachment 31058
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31058&action=edit
Source file + ii + s
Hi,
Please see in attached file the source triggering an internal error in gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824
Thomas Sanchez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31058|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Sanchez ---
The code is 21 lines... I can't reproduce the bug otherwise...
||
CC||thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Sanchez ---
Created attachment 31060
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31060&action=edit
Source file
Source file without any include added.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Sanchez ---
You're welcome, good luck !
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com
Hi everybody,
I encountered something not supported in gcc from 4.7 to 4.9, but working in
clang from 3.2 (tested on gcc goldbot).
Here is the code:
template
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
First reported there https://github.com/mapbox/jni.hpp/pull/17
The following code is compiling fine on clang but fails on g++
template
class Method {};
template
void Call
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com
Hi,
I'm really sorry for the vague bug report and not being able to give a small
piece of code to reproduce the bug.
Here is what I'm experiencing:
I developed a small library which performs ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Sanchez ---
Hi,
Thanks for your answer,
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (It would be easier to make sense of this if the line numbers in your gdb
> and valgrind output matched the code on github.)
>
Ind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Sanchez ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> > > N.B. the std::move in Manager::cancelConnection is redundant, the return
> > > value from cancel_connection is already an rvalue.
> >
> > Yes, I know, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Sanchez ---
With my previous mail, the link I added was because I wanted to ask that if you
were not able to reproduce the problem I could use CARE to recreate the
environment I'm running my test.
With lambda replaced (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Sanchez ---
Last comment on myself:
I got some errors relates to the promise with valgrind but they do not cause an
hangs
==30999== Thread 2:
==30999== Invalid read of size 4
==30999==at 0x4E44A91: pthread_once (pt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Sanchez ---
Hey,
I just wanted to know if you had the time to look into and/or if you were able
to reproduce the bug ?
Thanks,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Sanchez ---
Hi Hideaki,
I was able to workaround the bug by using boost promise instead of the STL one.
I did not have the time to investigate the bug however, I'm not really familiar
with the STL design :(
Here is w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Sanchez ---
In the end the problem is quite simple :) One workaround would be to move the
promise into the lambda however I would be glad that your patch get accepted,
because IMHO it is not an expected behavior from a
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com
Hi,
It looks like the data structure returned by bind does not contain some type
(argument_type) required by std::not1 for instance.
It works with clang + the libc++ on Mac Os X.
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Sanchez ---
BTW, I forgot to add that the compiler is invoked with this command:
g++ -std=c++11 test.cpp
Also, funny thing, with clang, it is the first one that do not compile :)
Thanks,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Sanchez ---
While it is not really intuitive I understand.
Thanks for your time!
18 matches
Mail list logo
