https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842
Bug 29842 depends on bug 27906, which changed state.
Bug 27906 Summary: reload allocates register of live register variable to
earlyclobber output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27906
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27906
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28144
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
Last reconfirmed|2016-03-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28306
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-07-07 17:30:13 |2019-3-5
Host|i686-pc-li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29860
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29944
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
gcc dot gnu.org |
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #41 from Steven Bosscher ---
After 12 years of changes, the value of the patches in this bug
report, and indeed the bug report itself, is difficult to gauge.
If this is still an issue, and that issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842
Bug 29842 depends on bug 20211, which changed state.
Bug 20211 Summary: autoincrement generation is poor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20211
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17652
Bug 17652 depends on bug 20211, which changed state.
Bug 20211 Summary: autoincrement generation is poor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20211
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23111
Bug 23111 depends on bug 20211, which changed state.
Bug 20211 Summary: autoincrement generation is poor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20211
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20369
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2007-05-17 17:50:53 |2019-3-5
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36003
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43473
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49469
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43334
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2012-03-13 00:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52778
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56075
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67118
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56187
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996
Bug 16996 depends on bug 9723, which changed state.
Bug 9723 Summary: With -Os optimization increases size if the loop contains
array element access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14721
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:52:08 |2019-3-6
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996
Bug 16996 depends on bug 24647, which changed state.
Bug 24647 Summary: two copies of a constant in two different registers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24647
What|Removed |Added
||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher ---
Trunk today:
f():
movlf()::i, %eax
testl %eax, %eax
jne .L1 # or je for the != case
movl$2, f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-03-18 12:45:53 |2019-3-6
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bo
||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher ---
Your code is not standard-conforming. Do this:
cm(1)%mu=2.8d-2
cm(1)%inc=7.5527d-1
and you have standard-conforming Fortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55263
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-11
20:29:15 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Sun Nov 11 20:29:11 2012
New Revision: 193412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193412
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/55263
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55263
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43056
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-02-13 23:09:24 |2012-11-11 23:09:24
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43546
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Last reconfirmed|2012-01-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44332
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #23 from Steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #39 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55277
Bug #: 55277
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at
lra-assigns.c:1217
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55277
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|55277 |
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-11
22:05:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 26100 [details]
> gcc47-pr51447.patch
>
> While that fixes the testcase at -O1, at -O2 and above it still fails.
> Apparent
|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2011-12-07 00:00:00 |2012-11-11 0:00
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-11
22:11:53 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-12
20:22:05 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Mon Nov 12 20:21:59 2012
New Revision: 193453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193453
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/51447
at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] global
|global register variable|register variable
|definition incorrectly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55290
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-13
10:30:27 UTC ---
There are several reasons why RTL LIM cannot currently hoist the (frame
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285
--- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-13
23:37:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 28678
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28678
Gross hack
(In reply to comment #11)
> If loops are still around at LRA time, perhaps L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-13
23:38:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 28673 [details]
> gcc48-pr43631.patch
>
> Is this what you meant?
Yes, that's exactly what I meant, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55348
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
-code
Last reconfirmed|2012-11-08 00:00:00 |2012-11-19 0:00
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-20
11:20:23 UTC ---
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-28
00:17:40 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Wed Nov 28 00:17:34 2012
New Revision: 193876
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193876
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/55006
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-30
13:00:46 UTC ---
Do you also have revision numbers in those logs?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48549
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-11-30
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-30
14:19:29 UTC ---
This fix is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55046
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #15 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-04
09:02:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Someone needs to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #18 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-04
09:56:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 28872
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28872
Updated tentative fix
(In reply to comment #16)
> I can provide IA-64 testing cycles, b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #19 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-04
10:02:58 UTC ---
This line is of course supposed to compare bb_state_array and
old_bb_state_array:
for (int i = (bb_state != old_bb_state) ? 0 : saved_last_basic_block;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org, |
|stevenb.gcc at gmail dot|
|com |
Summary|[4.8 Regression] internal |internal compiler error: in
|compiler error: in |plus_constant, at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-05
11:44:18 UTC ---
Vlad committed a set of powerpc fixes here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00272.html
Perhaps you can try the patch, see if it helps?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
--- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-05
12:24:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> The attached testcase gets miscompiled starting with that revision.
And is not fixed after r194108?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
--- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-05
12:32:24 UTC ---
Nothing new here, just yet another invalid REG_EQUAL note:
The webizer tries to split r51 in this insn:
;; basic block 4, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 7100, maybe hot
;;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-05
23:55:31 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Wed Dec 5 23:55:28 2012
New Revision: 194230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194230
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/55604
*
||FIXED
AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org|steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-07
11:40:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Douglas, can you help investigate the mmap error?
>
> Run "gcc -v". It will show a line executing the program cc1. Run gdb
> on cc1 with the ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-07
11:59:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Please hold on with that, seems BB_END is BARRIER, which is wrong.
> Starting with distilling a testcase...
Perhaps Alex' is right that the rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-07
22:02:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> R0 is a fixed register, it should not be used for spilling or be allocated by
> IRA.
But apparently RA believes it has to, to satisfy some constr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #23 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-08
12:12:59 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Sat Dec 8 12:12:50 2012
New Revision: 194322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194322
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/55158
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54952
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55623
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm*-*-*, aarch64-*-* |
--- Comment #5 from Steven B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55623
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55623
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #7 from Steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55629
Bug #: 55629
Summary: Missed value numbering to a constant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55629
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-09
16:09:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
There shouldn't be any such tables. Before the DF merge, there was
no_new_pseudos, but it had its problems.
Why can't cse_reg_info_table() be mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279
--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-09
16:13:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Why can't cse_reg_info_table() be modified to intercept this?
> Correction: get_cse_reg_info()
Like so, quick-and-d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-18
22:47:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Actually the MIPS backend does have an UNSPEC 230. It is one of the
> SYMBOL_64_* unspecs.
Then, why is symbol_type not defined within define_c_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20097
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20018
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20097
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-19
10:07:41 UTC ---
*** Bug 20018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41176
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #14 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802
Bug #: 55802
Summary: Various missed optimizations for a simple function in
GCC itself
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42643
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-01
19:31:57 UTC ---
Having a look...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-01
19:51:12 UTC ---
The nonsense set comes from force_operand:
Breakpoint 7, unroll_loop_runtime_iterations (loop=0x76b46f68) at
../../trunk/gcc/loop-unroll.c:1041
1041 start_sequence
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-01
19:52:48 UTC ---
... but actually it looks like it exists even before that:
(gdb) p debug_rtx(desc->niter_expr)
(udiv:QI (minus:QI (const_int -126 [0xff82])
(subreg:QI (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838
--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-01
20:44:12 UTC ---
I would expect the insn to match the movqi_internal insn:
(define_insn "*movqi_internal"
[(set (match_operand:QI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=q,q ,q ,r,r ,?r,m")
(m
at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
||gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-01
21:02:55 UTC ---
In general_operand, the following check fails:
951 if (CONST_INT_P (op)
952 && mode != VOIDm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55873
Bug #: 55873
Summary: Missed trivial uninitialized use warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55874
Bug #: 55874
Summary: Incorrect warning location for uninitialized variable
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
801 - 900 of 1051 matches
Mail list logo