[Bug other/38732] [4.4 Regression] Openoffice.org segfaults with runtime libs built from GCC trunk

2009-01-06 Thread stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
--- Comment #12 from stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com 2009-01-06 09:12 --- I was a bit sloppy in what I wrote before (i.e., in what Matthias turned into the description of this bug); it is the change of offsets of __cxa_exception members caused by the addition of referenceCount that

[Bug libstdc++/38732] [4.4 Regression] Openoffice.org segfaults with runtime libs built from GCC trunk

2009-01-08 Thread stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
--- Comment #20 from stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com 2009-01-08 08:31 --- re <#c17>: "prepended member can change the negative offset of the other struct members": see "the four bytes of referenceCount cancel out a previous four padding bytes just before th

[Bug libstdc++/32354] New: libstdc++.so.6 missing RPATH

2007-06-15 Thread stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
tephan dot bergmann at sun dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32354

[Bug libstdc++/32354] libstdc++.so.6 missing RPATH

2007-06-15 Thread stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
--- Comment #2 from stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com 2007-06-15 14:00 --- see <http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78390> -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32354

[Bug libstdc++/32354] libstdc++.so.6 missing RPATH

2007-06-17 Thread stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
--- Comment #5 from stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com 2007-06-18 06:54 --- Re #3: <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/install.html#usage> is not relevant here. That info is about how client code can find libstdc++.so. This issue is about how libstdc++.so can fi

[Bug c++/23418] New: old-style cast uses reinterpret+const instead of static+const

2005-08-16 Thread stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC

[Bug regression/19672] New: Performance regression in simple loop code

2005-01-28 Thread stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
regression AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu

[Bug target/19672] Performance regression in simple loop code

2005-01-31 Thread stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
--- Additional Comments From stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com 2005-01-31 09:09 --- "I think you can get all the speed back by supplying -mbranch-cost=1 but I could be wrong." No, adding -mbranch-cost=1 leads to only a very minor performance improvement. "Can you giv