https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop ---
Yes, with -m32 it fails with an ICE. Thanks for pointing this out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Oct 1 15:17:51 2015
New Revision: 228346
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228346&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
add recursion on the inner loops
We now check that all data references in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #12 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Oct 1 15:17:58 2015
New Revision: 228347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
call scev analysis in scop-detection as in sese-to-poly
Before our rewrit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66980
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Oct 1 22:04:07 2015
New Revision: 228357
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228357&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
correctly handle non affine data references
2015-10-01 Sebastian Pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66980
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop ---
We removed the code causing this issue.
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
If this is still a problem, please reopen and specify which ISL version is used
to reproduce the issue.
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop ---
We removed the code causing the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59586
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 59586, which changed state.
Bug 59586 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [graphite] Segmentation fault with -Ofast
-floop-parallelize-all -ftree-parallelize-loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59586
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 59121, which changed state.
Bug 59121 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] endless loop with -O2
-floop-parallelize-all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57732
Bug 57732 depends on bug 59121, which changed state.
Bug 59121 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] endless loop with -O2
-floop-parallelize-all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
What|Removed |Added
-
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop ---
GCC trunk passes bootstrap with BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3 -fgraphite-identity
-floop-nest-optimize" when configured with --disable-werror.
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
GCC trunk passes bootstrap with BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3 -fgraphite-identity
-floop-nest-optimize" when configured with --disable-werror.
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
The bug does not contain enough information to reproduce.
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop ---
The bug does not contain enough information to reproduce.
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
The bug does not contain enough information to reproduce.
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
This may have been fixed with the fix to PR51132 in r182050.
Please reopen if this still fails.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 51132 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51132
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop ---
Fixed in trunk with a recent ISL-0.15 that supports compute out.
$ time gfortran -O2 -fgraphite-identity pr42393.f90
real 0m1.737s
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Fixed in trunk gcc with a recent ISL-0.15 that has compute out functions.
$ time gcc -m32 -O2 -floop-interchange minified.i -S
real 0m0.129s
$ time gcc -m32 -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47598
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
Fixed on trunk with a recent ISL-0.15 that contains the compute time out
functions.
$ time gcc -O2 -floop-parallelize-all -c rdft.i
real 0m1.763s
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop ---
Passes with gfortran in trunk with ISL-0.15:
$ time gfortran vect-pr40979.f90 -O2 -fgraphite-identity -ftree-vectorize
-fno-vect-cost-model -fdump-tree-vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 67518, which changed state.
Bug 67518 Summary: [6 Regression][graphite] ISL: position out of bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67518
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67518
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50210
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 50210, which changed state.
Bug 50210 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in create_linear_expr_from_tree,
at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1137 with fgraphite-identity -ffast-math
-fno-tree-scev-cprop -fstrict-overflow
https:/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47595
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66070
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
r227572
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68279
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We have seen a performance regression due to r229685.
We see fewer FSM jump threads on the reduced testcase.
CC=2015-11-02-23-23-28-d3063db-trunk/bin/gcc
$CC -O3 m.c -fdump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63602
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68335
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68341
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68335
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
testcase added in r230630
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop ---
Fixed in r230632
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68279
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop ---
After fixing the graphite fail, I get these warnings from the testcase in
comment4:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop ---
Passes on ISL 0.14, fails with 0.15.
This patch fixes it: we will bootstrap and commit.
diff --git a/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c
b/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c
index 30c3a21..2783ac4 100644
--- a/gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68314
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68279
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68314
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
This patch exposes the problem without valgrind:
diff --git a/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c b/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
index 2054fad..b932dae 100644
--- a/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
+++ b/gcc/graphite-sese
||2015-11-23
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
I cannot reproduce the error on GCC 6.0 trunk.
Also, please provide a reduced testcase, the attached
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68314
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67984
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop ---
It fails with -O2 --param max-fsm-thread-paths=10 and does not fail with 9.
This is the thread that generates wrong code:
Registering FSM jump thread: (102, 6) incoming edge; (5, 128) nocopy;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Jump threading is called twice as two separate passes, the "miscompiled" jump
thread during the first invocation is:
Registering FSM jump thread: (10, 114) incoming edge; (4, 93) nocopy;
The "miscompiled"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
-fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:44 passes
-fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:45 fails
So this is the jump thread that produces the wrong code:
Registering FSM jump thread: (10, 114) incoming edge; (4, 93) n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
The problem is in the recursion step of
fsm_find_control_statement_thread_paths:
for (i = 0; i < gimple_phi_num_args (phi); i++)
{
tree arg = gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, i);
basic_block bbi =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop ---
Created attachment 34665
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34665&action=edit
fix
The problem is that we jump thread twice across the loop latch:
first, from
case '{':
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Fri Feb 6 21:08:13 2015
New Revision: 220491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220491&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 64878: do not jump thread across more than one back-edge
2015-02-04 Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Created attachment 34750
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34750&action=edit
fix
We used to attempt to jump thread this path that is not connex:
FSM jump thread: (7, 10) (13, 14)
This is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
The miscompile happens when compiling src/generic_optacc.c:
with -fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:167 it passes, and with
-fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:168 it segfaults.
The difference is:
--- /tmp/167
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
command line:
cd src
gcc -g -O1 -ftree-vrp -fexpensive-optimizations -pthread -fPIC -msse2
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../easel -I../libdivsufsort -I../easel -I. -I. -o
generic_optacc.o -c generic_optacc.c -fdbg-cnt=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Last reconfirmed|2015-02-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
--- Comment #39 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Sat Dec 6 19:19:37 2014
New Revision: 218451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
extend jump thread for finite state automata
PR tree-optimization/547
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 54742, which changed state.
Bug 54742 Summary: Switch elimination in FSM loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
Confirmed: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218640&root=gcc&view=rev
has fixed the bug that I was seeing.
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop ---
Fixed in http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137631
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 23455 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23455
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steinmtz at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Looking at the code generated at -O3 for the following function, we have to
load "*a" twice because "a" may alias "b":
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #37
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
void bar(int i) {
char A[10];
int d = 0;
while (i > 0)
A[d++] = i--;
while (d > 0)
foo(A[d--]);
}
Compile this function at -O3 with the last good revision r213487 and with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
I have seen a 15% perf regression on a version of bzip2 compress compiled at
-O3.
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
int a[30 +1][30 +1], b[30 +1][30 +1], r[30 +1][30 +1];
void Intmm (int run) {
int i, j, k;
for ( i = 1; i <= 30; i++ )
for ( j = 1; j <=
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 33518
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33518&action=edit
Preprocessed testcase
I get an ICE in ipa-comdats.c:371 when compiling system_error.cc from
libstdc++:
gcc -nostdinc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68565
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Mon Nov 30 20:39:16 2015
New Revision: 231086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
check for ISL generated code that leads to division by zero
we used to gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68565
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 2 20:40:17 2015
New Revision: 231206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231206&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix PR68550: do not handle ISL loop peeled statements
In case ISL did some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop ---
I do not see the error on today's trunk at r231233. Could you please verify
that this has been fixed by our changes from yesterday?
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68693
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Fri Dec 4 21:36:55 2015
New Revision: 231309
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231309&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix PR68693: Check for loop structure when extending the SCoP
The check fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68693
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68667
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68756
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341
Bug 69341 depends on bug 68692, which changed state.
Bug 68692 Summary: [6 Regression][graphite] ice: Segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69292
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop ---
*** Bug 69292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68976
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
Thanks Jeff for looking into this issue.
I was thinking about a heuristic as you mentioned in comment #2:
what about allowing creation of irreducible loops, multiple latches, etc. after
the loop optimizers ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61929
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61929
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Fri Jul 17 16:34:21 2015
New Revision: 225942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[graphite] fix pr61929
This fixes bootstrap of GCC with BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61929
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
201 - 300 of 502 matches
Mail list logo
