--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 08:41 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 08:41 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 08:44 ---
This might be a duplicate of PR42130.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 19:20 ---
As this is failing also on trunk I'm closing this bug as invalid.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 19:24 ---
The kernel from Comment #2 looks identical to the kernel from PR42637 that is
also miscompiled.
These two PRs may be the same.
Konrad, could you look at the testcase from PR42637 that is more precise?
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 01:20 ---
The problem here is that the loop invariant motion moves rt(i,j) into
a temporary outside the innermost loop:
real*8 rt(6,6),r(6,6),rtt(6,6)
do i=1,6
do j=1,6
t = rt(i,j)
do ia=1,6
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 14:46 ---
Subject: Bug 42664
Author: spop
Date: Sat Jan 16 14:46:19 2010
New Revision: 155964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155964
Log:
Fix PR42664.
2010-01-16 Harsha Jagasia
P
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 14:49 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 22:17 ---
I have looked again to this function, and I just realized that there
were changes to one of the functions of the data dependence test:
build_pairwise_scheduling_inequality used to build strict inequalities
for the
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 22:31 ---
Actually the change by Tobias is correct.
Still, the problem is around that point.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42637
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42777
everity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42914
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42914
--- Comment #25 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-02 18:02 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg3.html
was committed to trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=151348
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
--- Comment #27 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-03 06:20 ---
Right. On trunk both the reduced testcase and the original testcase pass
without ICE. I forgot to take 4.5 out of the summary, thanks for reminding me.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 07:14 ---
Subject: Bug 42637
Author: spop
Date: Sat Feb 6 07:13:39 2010
New Revision: 156538
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156538
Log:
Fix PR42637.
2010-02-05 Sebastian Pop
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 16:33 ---
This problem is fixed by the patch for PR42637 installed in the Graphite
branch.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42637 ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 16:33 ---
*** Bug 42479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 16:44 ---
This problem is fixed by the patch for PR42637 as installed in the Graphite
branch.
I would like to include the testcase from this PR in the Graphite testsuite.
Could somebody more fluent in Fortran rewrite the
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 16:44 ---
*** Bug 42558 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 17:42 ---
Subject: Bug 42637
Author: spop
Date: Sat Feb 6 17:41:54 2010
New Revision: 156552
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156552
Log:
Fix PR42637.
2010-02-05 Sebastian Pop
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 17:42 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-06 17:44 ---
Still fails after PR42637 has been fixed.
NB: that this miscompile is for -fgraphite-identity not with the loop opts.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 07:39 ---
Subject: Bug 42988
Author: spop
Date: Sun Feb 7 07:38:59 2010
New Revision: 156565
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156565
Log:
Fix PR42988: handle unknown_dependence.
2010-02-07 Sebas
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 07:49 ---
As Richi reported, it makes no sense to have a miscompile due to
Graphite in *trunk* with -O2 -fno-loop-block -fno-loop-strip-mine:
these flags do not enable Graphite in trunk and Graphite is not
enabled in trunk. I
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 07:52 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 15:44 ---
Subject: Bug 44955
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jul 21 15:44:24 2010
New Revision: 162381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162381
Log:
Fix PR 44955: Strip off the real and complex parts.
20
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 16:24 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 17:02 ---
Mine.
On trunk I am able to reproduce the ICE.
This is fixed in the Graphite branch, probably by the cleanup of the IV
canonicalization.
I will investigate a little bit more what happens in trunk, and if this is
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 16:45 ---
This looks like a duplicate of a binutils bug:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6957
I fail to see how this is related to Graphite: you may find
other codes that are padded with NOPL that are triggering
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45117
oduct: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45146
Summary: ICE in loop distribution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45313
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 20:41 ---
Subject: Bug 45229
Author: spop
Date: Tue Aug 17 20:41:26 2010
New Revision: 163319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163319
Log:
Fix PR45229: gcc.c-torture/execute/2412-4.c I
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-20 23:50 ---
Subject: Bug 45230
Author: spop
Date: Fri Aug 20 23:49:58 2010
New Revision: 163432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163432
Log:
Add testcase for PR45230.
2010-08-20 Sebastian Pop
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 17:19 ---
Subject: Bug 45680
Author: spop
Date: Thu Sep 16 17:19:25 2010
New Revision: 164345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164345
Log:
Fix PR45680.
2010-09-16 Reza Yazdani
PR b
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 17:21 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 19:01 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 15:54 ---
Subject: Bug 45758
Author: spop
Date: Thu Sep 23 15:54:01 2010
New Revision: 164567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164567
Log:
Add testcase for PR45758.
2010-09-23 Sebastian Pop
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 15:30 ---
Subject: Bug 44185
Author: spop
Date: Thu May 20 15:29:40 2010
New Revision: 159630
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159630
Log:
Fix PR44185: new prefetch test failures.
2010-05-20 C
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 15:30 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-24 22:44 ---
-fgraphite-identity does iteration splitting for this case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43423
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-24 23:02 ---
note: not vectorized: number of iterations cannot be computed.
Graphite has a problem with the generation of induction variables types
that makes the code harder to analyze after Graphite. I will try to get this
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-25 23:33 ---
This is not a IV type problem: the number of iterations may be zero when mid ==
0 or mid == n, so the number of iterations analysis has a condition under which
niter may_be_zero.
I sent out a patch that makes niter
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-28 14:46 ---
Confirmed.
I think that this one is a bug in CLooG-PPL. I will have a look at it.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-28 14:46 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-28 18:38 ---
Subject: Bug 44293
Author: spop
Date: Fri May 28 18:38:06 2010
New Revision: 159990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159990
Log:
Check the if-convertibility of phi nodes in non predic
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-28 18:46 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-28 23:38 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg02294.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44306
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-29 17:14 ---
Subject: Bug 44306
Author: spop
Date: Sat May 29 17:14:31 2010
New Revision: 160031
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160031
Log:
Don't use unshare_expr when not necessary.
2010-05-
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-29 17:15 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-01 18:18 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00063.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44363
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 16:39 ---
Subject: Bug 44363
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jun 2 16:39:26 2010
New Revision: 160163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160163
Log:
Fix PR44363: don't abort when the ifcvt anal
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 16:42 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 19:28 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 22:13 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 17:55 ---
Subject: Bug 44185
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jun 10 17:54:39 2010
New Revision: 160566
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160566
Log:
Fix PR44185: prefetch test failures.
2010-06-10 Changp
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 22:59 ---
Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01155.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44483
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 18:28 ---
Subject: Bug 44483
Author: spop
Date: Fri Jun 11 18:28:17 2010
New Revision: 160625
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160625
Log:
Fix PR44483: incrementally gimplify BB predicates
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 18:30 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-15 16:19 ---
Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01519.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44391
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-15 19:12 ---
Subject: Bug 44391
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jun 15 19:11:59 2010
New Revision: 160803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160803
Log:
Fix PR44391: use size_one_node for pointer types.
20
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-15 19:13 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 23:33 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44660
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-29 13:56 ---
Mine.
Patch 0005 of http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02250.html
fixes exactly this problem. I have not yet worked on correcting the patch
as Richi asked.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-30 16:11 ---
Mine.
Let's transform this code:
base_alias_pair *bap;
if (dr->aux)
bap = (base_alias_pair *)(dr->aux);
into:
base_alias_pair *bap;
gcc_assert (dr->aux);
bap = (b
--- Comment #16 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-02 16:34 ---
Subject: Bug 44576
Author: spop
Date: Fri Jul 2 16:34:29 2010
New Revision: 161727
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161727
Log:
PR 44576: miss rate computation improvement for prefetch
--- Comment #18 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 18:14 ---
Changpeng, should this PR be closed now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44576
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-08 16:38 ---
Subject: Bug 44710
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jul 8 16:38:00 2010
New Revision: 161964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161964
Log:
Call maybe_fold_or_comparisons to fold OR-ed predicates.
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-08 16:40 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #21 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-09 23:09 ---
Subject: Bug 44576
Author: spop
Date: Fri Jul 9 23:08:55 2010
New Revision: 162023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162023
Log:
pr44576 Avoid un-necessary prefetch analysis by distribu
--- Comment #22 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-09 23:12 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 17:01 ---
Subject: Re: not vectorized: can't determine dependence (array sections)
On 1 Jul 2007 12:46:31 -, dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (dependence classified: scev_not_known)
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 17:36 ---
Subject: Re: not vectorized: can't determine dependence (array sections)
> The testcase gets vectorized even with the failed dependence test.
>
This is okay. The test for non-dependence is added to t
--- Comment #18 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-31 13:53 ---
Subject: Bug 32377
Author: spop
Date: Wed Oct 31 13:53:03 2007
New Revision: 129797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129797
Log:
2007-10-31 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #19 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-31 13:53 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-03 06:38 ---
Confirmed, scev does not handle unsigned conversion.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #24 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-05 15:42 ---
Subject: Bug 33922
Author: spop
Date: Mon Nov 5 15:42:30 2007
New Revision: 129901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129901
Log:
2007-11-05 Nick Clifton <[EMAI
--- Comment #16 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-05 15:42 ---
Subject: Bug 32540
Author: spop
Date: Mon Nov 5 15:42:30 2007
New Revision: 129901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129901
Log:
2007-11-05 Nick Clifton <[EMAI
--- Comment #25 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-05 15:44 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #17 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-05 15:44 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 01:56 ---
Occurs only on 64bit machines: I cannot reproduce it on i686-linux.
I'll give a look at this bug on amd64 later on.
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 01:58 ---
Fails also on i686-linux. I'm working on a fix.
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-12 17:56 ---
Subject: Re: New: Segmentation fault with -ftree-loop-linear
> Every time I try to build any project with -ftree-loop-linear gcc fault with
> segmentaion fault while processing some function from some file.
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 20:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] verify_ssa failed with -ftree-loop-linear
I have a fix for this one, cleaning up the complex logic in
can_convert_to_perfect_nest.
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-17 19:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] verify_ssa failed with -ftree-loop-linear
Patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00735.html
test result on amd64-linux is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 07:09 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/ltrans-7.f90 doesn't work
I have a patch for this. The problem is in the data dependence
analysis that uses conversion to arbitrary integer_type_nodes.
I'm not yet sure about thi
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 19:40 ---
Subject: Bug 34123
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 18 19:40:35 2007
New Revision: 131040
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131040
Log:
2007-12-18 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 19:42 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 03:42 ---
Subject: Bug 34413
Author: spop
Date: Thu Dec 20 03:42:17 2007
New Revision: 131097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131097
Log:
2007-12-19 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 03:46 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 20:52 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] tree check: expected polynomial_chrec, have
integer_cst in add_multivariate_self_dist, at tree-data-ref.c:2813
I'm testing a patch that fixes the problem on i686-linux.
--- Co
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 20:52 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] tree check: expected polynomial_chrec, have
integer_cst in add_multivariate_self_dist, at tree-data-ref.c:2813
I'm testing a patch that fixes the problem on i686-linux.
--- Co
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 21:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] tree check: expected polynomial_chrec, have
integer_cst in add_multivariate_self_dist, at tree-data-ref.c:2813
I'm testing a patch that fixes the problem on i686-linux.
--- Co
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 02:39 ---
Subject: Bug 34635
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jan 3 02:38:24 2008
New Revision: 131275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131275
Log:
2007-12-19 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 02:41 ---
fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 02:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE in int_cst_value, at tree.c:8047 at -O3
The fix I sent earlier had a typo, so I'm testing again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34458
601 - 700 of 738 matches
Mail list logo
