--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-09 17:25 ---
I just committed the patch from Ian to the CLooG-PPL git repository.
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-09 17:30 ---
Subject: Bug 40103
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jun 9 17:30:23 2009
New Revision: 148318
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148318
Log:
2009-06-09 Sebastian Pop
PR bootstr
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-24 14:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> ICEs with -O -ffast-math -floop-block:
>
> also ICEs the same way on the trunk.
This is fixed in the graphite branch, although -floop-block is not
available now, I tried wi
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-21 16:31 ---
Hi,
Cases 1 and 2 are transformed as asked by -fgraphite-identity.
Case 3 is not recognized by graphite because there is a condition
that depends on a data reference. This will be fixed in a future
version of
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-21 16:50 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #21 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-22 16:27 ---
I will let Richi to solve this problem:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg01187.html
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 04:11 ---
Hi,
>From what I read this has nothing to do with Graphite. Could you
please reduce the bug using ideas from:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction
I am using to compile everything with a work
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-06 00:26 ---
This makes me think that Tobias' regtester does not test the polyhedron
benchmarks in the extra tests, or it does not report anymore the failures.
I will investigate this issue.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu do
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 04:40 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 03:29 ---
Subject: Bug 40980
Author: spop
Date: Wed Aug 12 03:29:35 2009
New Revision: 150674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150674
Log:
Prepare expressions to be good phi arguments.
20
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 14:33 ---
Subject: Bug 40980
Author: spop
Date: Wed Aug 12 14:32:31 2009
New Revision: 150694
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150694
Log:
Prepare expressions to be good phi arguments.
20
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 14:41 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 14:42 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 14:46 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 14:58 ---
Still fails on my machine, on rev150694.
~/gcc/svn/trunk/usr/bin/gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3
induct.f90 -o induct
time ./induct
real0m16.596s
user0m16.393s
sys 0m0.076s
~/gcc/svn/trunk
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 15:03 ---
This still fails on rev150694. The problem is in the data dependence analyzer:
Graphite loop transforms: 0.34 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.29 (0%) wall
2105 kB ( 7%) ggc
Graphite data dep analysis: 107.68 (95
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 15:14 ---
Subject: Bug 40103
Author: spop
Date: Wed Aug 12 15:13:52 2009
New Revision: 150696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150696
Log:
Remove pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-Wc++-compat&
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-13 00:14 ---
On amd64-linux at r150694, I have all the polyhedron bmks compiling fine.
I double checked for aermod.f90 with exactly the same options where you see the
error:
gfortran -O2 -fgraphite-identity -floop-strip-mine
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-13 01:36 ---
Could you please run gdb on f951 and then report a backtrace of where it fails?
Thanks,
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40981
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-13 02:37 ---
Subject: Re: aermod.f90 ICEs on -O2 -fgraphite-identity
-floop-strip-mine
Could you please try the attached patch?
Thanks,
Sebastian
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-13 02:37
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-13 15:28 ---
Subject: Re: aermod.f90 ICEs on -O2 -fgraphite-identity
-floop-strip-mine
Could you try this patch on top of trunk?
If this fails with the gcc_assert, then probably the bug is in PPL.
Sebastian
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 25211
Author: spop
Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006
New Revision: 116223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116223
Log:
PR middle-end/25211
PR middle-end/20256
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 26435
Author: spop
Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006
New Revision: 116223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116223
Log:
PR middle-end/25211
PR middle-end/20256
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 20256
Author: spop
Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006
New Revision: 116223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116223
Log:
PR middle-end/25211
PR middle-e
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 11:30 ---
Subject: Bug 31183
Author: spop
Date: Fri Mar 16 11:30:48 2007
New Revision: 122988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122988
Log:
PR tree-optimization/31183
* tree-loop-
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-11 01:09 ---
Subject: Bug 31343
Author: spop
Date: Wed Apr 11 01:09:35 2007
New Revision: 123708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123708
Log:
PR tree-optimization/31343
* tree
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33243
ssed opportunities for vectorization due to PRE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at
imization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33245
analysis
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 03:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=14136)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14136&action=view)
testcase
I just realized that all these inlined testcases were scrambled by bugzilla.
I'm su
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 03:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=14137)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14137&action=view)
testcase
This is the last testcase that get scrambled by bugzilla.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 14:19 ---
Subject: Re: Missed opportunities for vectorization due to unhandled real_type
Thanks for the detailed comments and further investigation.
On 30 Aug 2007 10:12:26 -, dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org >
> I co
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 14:19 ---
*** Bug 33246 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 14:19 ---
Duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33113 ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 14:06 ---
Subject: Re: Missed opportunities for vectorization due to invariant condition
> Looks like -fno-tree-pre is not enough, because if PRE doesn't do it, then
> sink
> does it. When I use "-O3 -ftr
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 19:58 ---
The problem is linked to the fact that we eliminate old induction variables
too early, so we end up with SSA names that were freed in the chrecs.
I'm testing a patch fixing this problem.
--
spop at gcc dot gn
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 15:45 ---
Subject: Bug 33576
Author: spop
Date: Wed Oct 3 15:45:10 2007
New Revision: 128986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128986
Log:
2007-10-03 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 15:47 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #22 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-11 19:35 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE with -O3 -ftree-loop-linear
There are several bugs that fail in the exact same place, because
we're not able to generate code for some induction variable containing
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 14:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in bsi_for_stmt at tree-cfg.c when
using -O1 -ftree-loop-linear
I verified that this bug is also fixed by this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00798.html
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 21:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] DOM and VRP creating harder to
optimize code
Just looking again to this old bug...
The problem with VRP/DOM is that they just state equalities, and then
they apply the
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 19:03 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #24 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 19:03 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #23 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 19:02 ---
Subject: Bug 24309
Author: spop
Date: Fri Oct 19 19:01:58 2007
New Revision: 129494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129494
Log:
2007-10-19 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 19:02 ---
Subject: Bug 23820
Author: spop
Date: Fri Oct 19 19:01:58 2007
New Revision: 129494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129494
Log:
2007-10-19 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 19:02 ---
Subject: Bug 33766
Author: spop
Date: Fri Oct 19 19:01:58 2007
New Revision: 129494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129494
Log:
2007-10-19 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 19:02 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 21:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer
> Another thing, 4.4 does not vectorize this loop anymore (and, therefore, there
> is no ICE), because of unknown number of iteratio
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 16:19 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> During SCoP detection we split bbs (e.g. in "scopdet_edge_info"), but the SCoP
> detection should only detect SCoPs and not modify anything.
No, we want to split BBs to i
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37388
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 21:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=16236)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16236&action=view)
fix
This patch fixes the bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37388
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 22:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=16239)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16239&action=view)
fix
the attached patch fixes PR37375 by changing instantiate_scev to take
a basic block above which
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 18:41 ---
Subject: Bug 37375
Author: spop
Date: Tue Sep 9 18:39:45 2008
New Revision: 140164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140164
Log:
2008-09-05 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 19:05 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 14:48 ---
Subject: Bug 37388
Author: spop
Date: Wed Sep 10 14:46:35 2008
New Revision: 140232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140232
Log:
2008-09-10 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 16:06 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-11 16:47 ---
Jan proposed to switch to a different algorithm for detecting scops
based on the fact that scops are single entry, single exit regions.
Instead of detecting scops from the innermost to the outermost, we
should instead
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 23:05 ---
Subject: Bug 37484
Author: spop
Date: Fri Sep 12 23:03:54 2008
New Revision: 140327
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140327
Log:
2008-09-12 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 23:08 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 14:50 ---
Subject: Re: [graphite] Disconnecting exit edge in process of code generation
> Commit 140746 should have fixed Bug 3. Can you confirm this?
This is a side effect of your patch. This bug is not yet fixed, and
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 22:50 ---
Subject: Bug 37485
Author: spop
Date: Thu Oct 2 22:48:46 2008
New Revision: 140844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140844
Log:
2008-10-02 Jan Sjodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #18 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-03 15:49 ---
Mine.
We should do exactly what graphite is doing: register loops belonging
to the loop nest in a VEC, then iterate over the loop nest to find the
index in the Access Matrix.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-03 20:28 ---
This bug will be fixed when the patches for PR37485 will be in trunk.
The bug is fixed in the graphite branch.
Sebastian
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37485 ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-03 20:28 ---
*** Bug 37587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-03 20:38 ---
This bug is different than PR37485. It still fails in the graphite branch.
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-03 21:10 ---
Subject: Bug 37684
Author: spop
Date: Fri Oct 3 21:09:37 2008
New Revision: 140861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140861
Log:
2008-10-03 Harsha Jagasia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-03 21:11 ---
Bug is fixed in graphite branch. Waiting review for trunk.
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-10 15:28 ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=141042
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |A
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-11 19:26 ---
Subject: Re: [graphite] Disconnecting exit edge in process of code generation
>Are there any overlapping scops with the current code?
I haven't seen overlapping scops anymore. Thanks.
--
http://gcc
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-14 15:32 ---
Mine.
It makes no sense to loop block single nested loops.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-14 18:24 ---
Subject: Bug 37828
Author: spop
Date: Tue Oct 14 18:23:05 2008
New Revision: 141116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141116
Log:
2008-10-14 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-14 18:29 ---
Fixed on graphite branch.
We should open another bug once the -fgraphite-identity is in.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37828
--- Comment #22 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 16:14 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #23 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 16:14 ---
Subject: Bug 37686
Author: spop
Date: Wed Oct 15 16:13:33 2008
New Revision: 141141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141141
Log:
2008-10-15 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 16:18 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 16:19 ---
Subject: Bug 37828
Author: spop
Date: Wed Oct 15 16:17:45 2008
New Revision: 141142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141142
Log:
2008-10-15 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #14 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 16:25 ---
Subject: Bug 37485
Author: spop
Date: Wed Oct 15 16:24:15 2008
New Revision: 141143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141143
Log:
2008-10-15 Jan Sjodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #15 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 16:27 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 21:28 ---
split_constant_offset does not handle correctly the offset of
&s.c[1] as this is an ADDR_EXPR whose op0 was set by
extract_ops_from_tree to itself, an ADDR_EXPR. Now this code
is not handle
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16 00:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] gcc-4.4 regression: incorrect code generation
with -O1 -ftree-vectorize
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:47 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
> IMHO the fix for the tuplification bug(!) is
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16 13:59 ---
I prefer the second solution: if (multiplication_in_parameters (n)) then
insert a new parameter on the BB preceding the scop, and use
force_gimple_operand to gimplify the sequence of stmts for n.
This returns a
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16 15:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=16511)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16511&action=view)
patch for solution 2
Patch as discussed at today's graphite call: detect multiplications of
para
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 18:07 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 18:08 ---
Subject: Bug 37891
Author: spop
Date: Wed Oct 22 18:06:40 2008
New Revision: 141301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141301
Log:
2008-10-22 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 22:41 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 22:54 ---
Tobias, your patch looks good.
Please test with bootstrap and make check and then commit to trunk.
Thanks,
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37943
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 16:36 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 16:36 ---
Subject: Bug 36908
Author: spop
Date: Mon Nov 3 16:35:13 2008
New Revision: 141550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141550
Log:
2008-11-03 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 16:44 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 16:44 ---
Subject: Bug 37684
Author: spop
Date: Mon Nov 3 16:43:02 2008
New Revision: 141551
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141551
Log:
2008-11-03 Harsha Jagasia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-04 01:03 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-04 01:03 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] ICE in tree-data-ref.c with -ftree-loop-linear
> Sebastian, any ideas how to fix this one?
I will look at this bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36922
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-07 03:46 ---
I will not work on fixing this bug on the 4.2 branch, as it was fixed on the
4.3 and later. The changes were too large for back-porting.
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
101 - 200 of 738 matches
Mail list logo
