[Bug c++/52224] New: [C++0x] Generic operator gets pulled into compile-time expression

2012-02-12 Thread solodon at mail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52224 Bug #: 52224 Summary: [C++0x] Generic operator gets pulled into compile-time expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52224] [C++0x] Generic operator gets pulled into compile-time expression

2012-02-13 Thread solodon at mail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52224 --- Comment #4 from Yuriy Solodkyy 2012-02-13 21:17:36 UTC --- Was wondering myself if that can be a design issue - here is a related report I did earlier for VC++ 11: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/724557/vs11-compi

[Bug c++/51710] New: decltype and SFINAE

2011-12-29 Thread solodon at mail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51710 Bug #: 51710 Summary: decltype and SFINAE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/51710] decltype and SFINAE

2012-01-02 Thread solodon at mail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51710 --- Comment #3 from Yuriy Solodkyy 2012-01-02 21:35:56 UTC --- Thank you, I am aware of the workaround and that is exactly what I do in my code, however I think the current behavior is counter intuitive: 1. I get error message about instantiatio

[Bug c++/55460] New: Template-dependent name is not looked up at instantiation point

2012-11-24 Thread solodon at mail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55460 Bug #: 55460 Summary: Template-dependent name is not looked up at instantiation point Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCON

[Bug c++/55460] Template-dependent name is not looked up at instantiation point

2012-11-24 Thread solodon at mail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55460 --- Comment #2 from Yuriy Solodkyy 2012-11-25 01:07:36 UTC --- Not sure I understand your comment - ADL with respect to what: my::filter or the ::operator&? Can you elaborate please?

[Bug c++/50080] New: error: 'template' (as a disambiguator) is only allowed within templates

2011-08-14 Thread solodon at mail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50080 Bug #: 50080 Summary: error: 'template' (as a disambiguator) is only allowed within templates Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/68288] botched floating-point UDL

2020-10-11 Thread solodon at mail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68288 Yuriy Solodkyy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||solodon at mail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/68288] botched floating-point UDL

2020-10-11 Thread solodon at mail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68288 --- Comment #4 from Yuriy Solodkyy --- P.S. I added my previous example to this bug as they seemed to be related, feel free to split it into a separate bug if they are not. P.P.S. Change that return expression to 42_sp-p and the parser seems to