[Bug testsuite/54772] vectorization broken in gfortran on x86_64-*-freebsd

2012-10-02 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54772 --- Comment #3 from Sharad Singhai 2012-10-02 17:19:14 UTC --- Author: singhai Date: Tue Oct 2 17:19:09 2012 New Revision: 191991 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191991 Log: 2012-10-02 Sharad Singhai P

[Bug testsuite/54772] vectorization broken in gfortran on x86_64-*-freebsd

2012-10-02 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
||FIXED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |singhai at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Sharad Singhai 2012-10-02 17:25:46 UTC --- Should be fixed with r191991.

[Bug other/55164] [4.8 Regression] -fdump-*-all not working

2012-11-01 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55164 --- Comment #2 from Sharad Singhai 2012-11-01 17:55:46 UTC --- Author: singhai Date: Thu Nov 1 17:55:23 2012 New Revision: 193064 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193064 Log: 2012-11-01 Sharad Singhai P

[Bug other/55164] [4.8 Regression] -fdump-*-all not working

2012-11-01 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55164 Sharad Singhai changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/57850] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

2013-08-06 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850 --- Comment #7 from Sharad Singhai --- I looked at it and this issue seems related to handling of PCH files. The following patch introduced it http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/cp/decl2.c?r1=194363&r2=194362&pathrev=194363 When only a hea

[Bug middle-end/58134] [4.8/4.9 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose= shows vectroiyed loops only for N== 1 and N >2 but not for N==2

2013-08-12 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58134 --- Comment #3 from Sharad Singhai --- I think this is the intended behavior. While working on the new dump infrastructure, I modified the behavior of -ftree-vectorizer-verbose. Thus right now -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1 : dump info about optimiz

[Bug middle-end/58134] [4.8/4.9 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose= shows vectorized loops only for N== 1 and N >2 but not for N==2

2013-08-28 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58134 --- Comment #4 from Sharad Singhai --- I think perhaps it would be better if I remove this deprecated option -ftree-vectorizer-verbose= completely. It is confusing in its current form and the equivalent functionality is already available via -fopt

[Bug gcov-profile/45890] Coverage may be weakened by r164986

2011-10-01 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45890 --- Comment #1 from Sharad Singhai 2011-10-01 19:39:32 UTC --- Created attachment 25392 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25392 tar of source and coverage files

[Bug gcov-profile/45890] Coverage may be weakened by r164986

2011-10-01 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45890 --- Comment #2 from Sharad Singhai 2011-10-01 19:42:48 UTC --- I don't know if it is related. But the coverage is imprecise in case of attached source file foo.c. Build it with O2, as gcc --coverage -O2 foo.c ./a.out gcov -b foo.c Now the cove

[Bug middle-end/58134] [4.8/4.9 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose= shows vectorized loops only for N== 1 and N >2 but not for N==2

2013-10-30 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58134 --- Comment #6 from Sharad Singhai --- Author: singhai Date: Thu Oct 31 01:01:40 2013 New Revision: 204244 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204244&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-30 Sharad Singhai PR middle-end/58134 * opts.c (commo

[Bug middle-end/58134] [4.8/4.9 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose= shows vectorized loops only for N== 1 and N >2 but not for N==2

2013-10-31 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58134 Sharad Singhai changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

2013-01-16 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot |singhai at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #3 from Sharad Singhai 2013-01-16 17:03:26 UTC --- Hmm, it looks like it is trying to output a source location where none exists. This is clearly a bug. I would look at it

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

2013-01-18 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55995 --- Comment #4 from Sharad Singhai 2013-01-18 18:26:17 UTC --- Author: singhai Date: Fri Jan 18 18:26:04 2013 New Revision: 195303 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195303 Log: 2013-01-18 Sharad Singhai P

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

2013-01-18 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55995 Sharad Singhai changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/66192] C++ static initializer unnecessary __cxa_guard_acquire for TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING

2015-06-08 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192 --- Comment #3 from Sharad Singhai --- Author: singhai Date: Tue Jun 9 06:45:43 2015 New Revision: 224265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224265&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport r224118 from trunk for Google ref b/20542176 and b/20766120.

[Bug target/66200] GCC for ARM / AArch64 doesn't define TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING

2015-06-08 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200 --- Comment #4 from Sharad Singhai --- Author: singhai Date: Tue Jun 9 06:45:43 2015 New Revision: 224265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224265&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport r224118 from trunk for Google ref b/20542176 and b/20766120.

[Bug testsuite/66497] New: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/aarch64_guard1.C

2015-06-10 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: singhai at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This is a bug which requires testcase update after r224118. The failure is like this: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/aarch64_guard1.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump original "_ZGVZ3foovE1

[Bug testsuite/66497] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/aarch64_guard1.C

2015-06-10 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66497 Sharad Singhai changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/66301] internal compiler error when using -fopt-info

2015-06-12 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301 Sharad Singhai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||singhai at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment