https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 55926
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55926&action=edit
preprocessed .ii file
Yup, that looks like the culprit.
Preprocessed file attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111480
Bug ID: 111480
Summary: new test case g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
Bug ID: 111544
Summary: [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after
r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can't attach the whole thing but I am working on cutting it down.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
--- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
From, the original I cut it down to this. Compiles OK with r14-4110, error
with r14-4111.
bad3.c: In member function 'NameIdPoolEnumerator&
NameIdPoolEnumerator::operator=(const NameIdPoolEnum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111603
Bug ID: 111603
Summary: [14 regression] new test case
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr111456-1.c in
r14-4280-gc3c6f30496d945 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111644
Bug ID: 111644
Summary: [13 regression] many failures after
r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
Bug ID: 111664
Summary: [14 regression] error in gcc/opt-read.awk after
r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111644
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I installed gawk on the machine where it failed and the build works now. So
definitely mawk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686
Bug ID: 111686
Summary: [13 regression] excess errors in
23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc after
r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688
Bug ID: 111688
Summary: [14 regression] bootstrap failure after
r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If you need me to try something let me know.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116148
Bug ID: 116148
Summary: [15 regression]
c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-2.c fails
after r15-2403-g136f364e26d9ad
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116200
Bug ID: 116200
Summary: [15 regression] ICE in stage 2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
Bug ID: 116254
Summary: new test case gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90
from r15-2739-g4cb07a38233aad fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116270
Bug ID: 116270
Summary: [15 regression] erratic failures (time outs) of
gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116271
Bug ID: 116271
Summary: [15 regression] gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s176.c
fails after r15-2777-g8fac69a2dbff98
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116271
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried that patch and it seems to work just fine:
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s176.c"
# of expected passes6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116354
Bug ID: 116354
Summary: [15 regression] ICE during bootstrap stage 2 after
r15-2891-gb219cbeda72d23
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116349
--- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am seeing this same failure in doing a bootstrap build during stage 2 on
powerpc64:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116461
Bug ID: 116461
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-mod-var.c from
r15-3082-g9bbad3685131ec fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116462
Bug ID: 116462
Summary: [15 regression] new test case
gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c from
r15-3083-gbcb33b1237042e fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116464
Bug ID: 116464
Summary: [15 regression] new test gcc.dg/torture/pr116420.c
from r15-3095-gc9377734b798d8 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116522
Bug ID: 116522
Summary: [15 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c: error
executing dg-final after r15-3254-g3f51f0dc88ec21
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116143
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I was wrong initially about this being intermittent. It always fails for a
compiler built with --enable-checking=release and it started with
r15-1410-gf89f9c7ae7190c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116635
Bug ID: 116635
Summary: new test case cc.dg/opt-ordered-and-nonequal-1.c from
r15-3463-g91421e21e8f0f0 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116653
Bug ID: 116653
Summary: new test case gfortran.dg/unsigned_21.f90 from
r15-3526-g113a6da9bf91c5 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116654
Bug ID: 116654
Summary: [15 regression] many vector test case failures after
r15-3509-gd34cda72098867
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116665
Bug ID: 116665
Summary: new test case gfortran.dg/gomp/interop-1.f90 ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116683
Bug ID: 116683
Summary: new test g++.dg/ext/pragma-unroll-lambda-lto.C from
r15-3585-g9759f6299d9633 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116707
Bug ID: 116707
Summary: [15 regression]
c-c++-common/torture/builtin-clear-padding-3.c fails
after r13-9019-g1880ff0dbd814c
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109149
Bug ID: 109149
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr108950.c from
r12-9262-gf4e4108dd00508 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am updating some tools on the system and will try again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 54684
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54684&action=edit
Preprocessed file
Attached file from this command
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The excess error is:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c: In
function 'foo':
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c:11:13:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Alas, yes. This system is quite old and not being updated any more. It
hopefully will be retired soon.
This probably isn't a big deal and as far as I am concerned can be ignored.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109447
Bug ID: 109447
Summary: test case libffi.closures/cls_align_longdouble_split.c
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109466
Bug ID: 109466
Summary: [13 regression] gfortran.dg/gomp/affinity-clause-1.f90
fails after r13-7120-g46fe32cb4d887d
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109560
Bug ID: 109560
Summary: new test case g++.dg/ext/int128-8.C from
r14-88-ged32ec26697cc7 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109572
Bug ID: 109572
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-4.c from
r14-108-g705b0d2b62318b fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109589
Bug ID: 109589
Summary: [14 regression] r14-35-g278f8f567b5470 breaks build
with older gcc build compilers
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109589
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've seen some successful builds go by on the old systems. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109608
Bug ID: 109608
Summary: [14 regression] net test case
g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf3.C in
r10-11306-gda17a9049ee0a8 has excess errors
Product: gcc
Version: 10.4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109610
Bug ID: 109610
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dform-3.c fails
after
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109608
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] net test|[10 regression] net test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656
Bug ID: 109656
Summary: [14 regression]
26_numerics/random/random_device/cons/token.cc fails
after r14-289-gf9412cedd6c0e7
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It failed on just the one power 8 system where it fails every time.
configure --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --enable-secureplt --with-cpu=power8
--disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib
I will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109672
Bug ID: 109672
Summary: [143 regression] many ICEs after
r14-323-g977a43f5ba778b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
Bug ID: 109705
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c fails after
r14-333-g6d4b59a9356ac4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
make -k check
RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=26_numerics/random/random_device/cons/token.cc"
This is from powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++.log
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109749
Bug ID: 109749
Summary: new test case g++.dg/vect/pr109573.cc ICEs with checks
turned on
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109749
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried this on gcc 12 and it did not ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109793
Bug ID: 109793
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr108950.c from
r11-10752-gd4cbcb9e45c6d4 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
Bug ID: 109880
Summary: [14 regression]
gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails
after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114614
Bug ID: 114614
Summary: New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from
r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642
Bug ID: 114642
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from
r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114662
Bug ID: 114662
Summary: [14 regression] new test case c_lto_pr113359-2 from
r14-9841-g1e3312a25a7b34 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114744
Bug ID: 114744
Summary: test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-6-p9-runnable.c
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114744
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
also gcc 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114939
Bug ID: 114939
Summary: [15 regression] c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c
fails after r15-125-g7117e1f6bf6de2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
Bug ID: 114985
Summary: [15 regression] internal compiler error: in
discriminator_fail during stage2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 58129
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58129&action=edit
pre-processed failing file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried that and with it trunk did finish building. I am running a test of
that now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
tests ran OK too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
Bug ID: 115110
Summary: [15 regression] several failures after
r15-512-g9b7cad5884f21c
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115110
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115136
Bug ID: 115136
Summary: [15 regression] experimental/functional/searchers.cc
fails after
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115136
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115140
Bug ID: 115140
Summary: [15 regression]
libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof
-kernels-1.c excess errors after
r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115174
Bug ID: 115174
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/lto/pr113359-2 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: othe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115262
Bug ID: 115262
Summary: [15 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c fails
after r15-831-g05daf617ea22e1
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115282
Bug ID: 115282
Summary: 15 regression]
gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-12.c fails
after r15-812-gc71886f2ca2e46
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115334
Bug ID: 115334
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c from
r15-919-gef27b91b62c3aa fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115282
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I originally saw this on a BE run but indeed it fails on LE too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115365
Bug ID: 115365
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/pr100927.c from
r15-1022-gb05288d1f1e4b6 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777
Bug ID: 111777
Summary: [14 regression] build breaks after
r14-4558-g400efdddf3d849
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oops, wrong system. On the failing one it shows:
makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 5.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111777
--- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That patch works fine on a system where the build was failing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787
Bug ID: 111787
Summary: [14 regression] xxx breaks build
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This system is on RHEL 8 which has gcc 8.5 as the distro compiler.
And yes, the patch worked.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812
Bug ID: 111812
Summary: [14 regression] Can't build with gcc 4.8.5
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boots
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried a build with r14-4659-ga22eeaca5ce753 and I see the following which
looks like it might be the mentioned union issues.
g++ -std=gnu++11 -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111812
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850
Bug ID: 111850
Summary: [14 regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111852
Bug ID: 111852
Summary: [14 regression] r14-4339-geaa41a6dc127d8 breaks
building with gcc 4.8.5
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, it does look like an improvement ad I doubt the number of addis really
matters. That's why I said the test probably just needs to be updated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111866
Bug ID: 111866
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when compiling
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111852
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yup, thanks!
In another 4.8.5 breakage PR someone mentioned removing that as the minimum
required compiler level. Has there been any more discussion of that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111868
Bug ID: 111868
Summary: [14 regression] many ICEs after r14-4710
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am still seeing the same failure on power.
tried with g:668c4c3783970e7adf0591396b6d0d5286cc0541, r14-4930-g668c4c3783970e
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103
Bug ID: 112103
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails
after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112340
Bug ID: 112340
Summary: [14 regression] assembler instruction counts off for
gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112522
Bug ID: 112522
Summary: [14 regression] g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-1.C fails
with excess errors after r14-5310-g879cf9ff45d940
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534
Bug ID: 112534
Summary: [14 regression] build failure after
r14-5424-gdb50aea6259545 using gcc 4.8.5
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
601 - 700 of 791 matches
Mail list logo
