https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The fix worked fine in my testing on trunk. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106515
Bug ID: 106515
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-int-1.c fails
after r13-1937-g5df04a7aa837a1
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106516
Bug ID: 106516
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106516
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104992
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106519
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106561
Bug ID: 106561
Summary: gfortran.dg/ieee/signaling_1.f90 fails with
--with-long-double-format=ieee
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106575
Bug ID: 106575
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/fold-eqandshift-4.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106579
Bug ID: 106579
Summary: ieee_signaling_nan problem in fortran on powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106679
Bug ID: 106679
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after
r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106735
Bug ID: 106735
Summary: tens of thousands of errors in C++ library
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106735
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It it causing so many error messages that emails to the gcc test results list
from my autotesters are being rejected as they are 3.9MB in size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106761
Bug ID: 106761
Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-*_b.C
test cases fails after r13-2158-g02f6b405f0e9dc
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106795
Bug ID: 106795
Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/empty-loop.C fails
with excess errors after r13-2303-gb911ca4231a366
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106796
Bug ID: 106796
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after
r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106806
Bug ID: 106806
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c fails
after r13-2333-gca8f4e8af14869
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814
Bug ID: 106814
Summary: [13 regression] r13-2266-g8bb1df032cc080 breaks some
mpfr tests
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Do a bootstrap build then
make checkmpfr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, that's make check-mpfr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I used download_prerequistes before the build.
seurer@rain6p1:~/gcc/git/gcc-test$ ./contrib/download_prerequisites --force
2022-09-02 09:12:04
URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/gmp-6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried dae8b9e2bbb6017bf90d68c7b720c500125c8295, r13-2390-gdae8b9e2bbb601 and
I am still seeing the failures.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106872
Bug ID: 106872
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-12.c fails after
r13-2500-g0a4a2667dc115c
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879
Bug ID: 106879
Summary: [13 regression] new test case
gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-layout-19.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106894
Bug ID: 106894
Summary: [13 regression] multiple libgomp failures after
r13-2545-g9f2fca56593a2b
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059
Bug ID: 107059
Summary: [13 regression] bootstrap failure after
r13-2887-gb04208895fed34
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It still fails for me (r13-2903-ge73d9fcafbd07b). It looks like fixincludes
ran:
make
. . .
Fixing directory /usr/include into
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/include-fixed
Applying io_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059
--- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oops, I cut too much from my previous comment:
Applying glibc_cxx_floatn_1 to powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h
Applying glibc_cxx_floatn_2 to powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/floa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The errors are all still as shown above in the same files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059
--- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No special env vars for anything on that system. With verbose:
seurer@perkins:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++$
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag CXX --tag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107062
Bug ID: 107062
Summary: [13 regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/fma_1.f90 fails after
r13-2577-g7c4c65d11469d2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107062
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seurer@rain6p1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ cat a.f90
use ieee_arithmetic
integer, parameter :: k1 = &
max(ieee_selected_real_kind(precision(0.d0) + 1), kind(0.))
integer, parameter :: k2 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107062
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With that patch the test case passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107073
Bug ID: 107073
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107098
Bug ID: 107098
Summary: [13 regression] failure in 453.povray
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107098
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 regression] failure in |[13 regression] failure in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059
--- Comment #30 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Any more progress on this? Builds still fail on powerpc64 LE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160
Bug ID: 107160
Summary: [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes
verification failure in spec2006
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One of the compilation commands:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/g++ -c -o auto_derivative_function.o
-DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -Iinclude -DBOOST_DISABLE_THREADS -Ddeal_II_dimension=3
-m64 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107171
Bug ID: 107171
Summary: New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr105586.c fails
after its introduction in r13-2525-gbec35caafae8db
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that 554.roms_r from spec2017 also fails after this commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Bug ID: 107181
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in
r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I added that option and 554.roms_r now runs OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107213
Bug ID: 107213
Summary: New test case c-c++-common/pointer-to-fn1.c uses
unsupported option r13-3202-g67efffec943656
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107220
Bug ID: 107220
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-19.c fails
after r13-3212-gb88adba751da63
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
Bug ID: 107240
Summary: [13 regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
Bug ID: 107299
Summary: [13 regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311
Bug ID: 107311
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107338
Bug ID: 107338
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c in
r13-3413-ge10ca9544632db fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353
Bug ID: 107353
Summary: [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after
13-3416-g1d561e1851c466
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103935
Bug ID: 103935
Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr98855.cc fails after
r12-6273
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103971
Bug ID: 103971
Summary: [12 regression] build fails after r12-6420, ICE at
libgfortran/generated/matmul_i1.c:2450
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
Bug ID: 104015
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c fails on
power 9 (only)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #15 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looking through test results I see that gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c and
gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c are still failing today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104033
Bug ID: 104033
Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-compare2.C
fails with excess errors after r12-6578
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104035
Bug ID: 104035
Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr57993-2.C fails with
excess errors after r12-6586
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104037
Bug ID: 104037
Summary: [12 regression] excess errors in
g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C after r12-6581
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104103
Bug ID: 104103
Summary: [12 regression] many excess errors from
g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C after r12-6606
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104103
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also,
g:9d6a0f388eb048f8d87f47af78f07b5ce513bfe6, r12-6606
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg-torture.exp=gcc.dg/torture/pr57147-2.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr57147-2.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104150
Bug ID: 104150
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pr104089.c fails after
its introduction in r12-6700
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104206
Bug ID: 104206
Summary: [12 regression] test case c-c++-common/pr72747-2.c
fails in r12-6821
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104214
Bug ID: 104214
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr81196.c fails after
r12-6844
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104249
Bug ID: 104249
Summary: [12 regression] RTL failure with checks turned on
after r12-6848
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104335
Bug ID: 104335
Summary: [12 regression] build failure if go is included in
languages after r12-6747
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104562
Bug ID: 104562
Summary: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/gomp/depend-5.f90 fails
after r12-7242-g3939c1b11279dc
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104562
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103628
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103628
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There isn't a check_mod.f90 but there is a check_mod.F90 (Linux is case
sensitive) and using that I was able to reproduce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104586
Bug ID: 104586
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/pr102798.c in
523f5950c70d65714bedf9d5fe164d9e6d69dd87 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103051
Bug ID: 103051
Summary: [12 regression] new test case
gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s112.c fails in r12-4840
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103051
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
vect_hw_misalign is one way though it is used in the dg-final instead of
dg-skip. There are lots of examples in other vect tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103061
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088
Bug ID: 103088
Summary: [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails
since r12-4698
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One of the ocmpilations was this:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/gcc -c -o ext/re/re_comp.o -DSPEC
-DNDEBUG -DPERL_CORE -I. -Idist/IO -Icpan/Time-HiRes -Icpan/HTML-Parser
-Iext/re -Isp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103142
Bug ID: 103142
Summary: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90
fails at execution after r12-4976
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Was the change that caused this backported to gcc 11? I am seeing the same
failures there now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103160
Bug ID: 103160
Summary: [12 regression] typo in r12-5060 breaks bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103178
Bug ID: 103178
Summary: [12 regression] several test case ICEs after r12-5113
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103179
Bug ID: 103179
Summary: [12 regression] Excess errors in
gfortran.dg/do_subscript_3.f90 after r12-5126
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also this one which fails but doesn't ICE
g:d70ef65692fced7ab72e0aceeff7407e5a34d96d, r12-5113
make -k check-gcc-fortran
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_17.f90"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103196
Bug ID: 103196
Summary: [12 regression]
gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103243
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm aarch64 |arm aarch64 powerpc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103264
Bug ID: 103264
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/merge_block.c fails
after r12-5236
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103262
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103262
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
re: "only on power 10". Not quite true. I tried running it a bunch of times
on power 8, 9, and 10. r12-5244 fails consistently on power 9 and power 10 but
not on power 8 (nor 7 from previous te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282
Bug ID: 103282
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/modref-dse-5.c in
r12-5292 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103293
Bug ID: 103293
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/if-to-switch-3.c fails
after r12-5301
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103243
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
At or somewhere just before r12-5221 it now succeeds, at least on powerpc64
g:2f3d43a35155685b1795b4392e20e1c14a33c38f, r12-5221
New passes (these tests previously failed but now do not):
FAIL: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088
--- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am still seeing the failure on powerpc64 with current trunk (r12-5320), too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103321
Bug ID: 103321
Summary: [12 regression] ICE at tree-ssa.c:1211 after r12-5300
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like it is 32 bit only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103335
Bug ID: 103335
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/modref-dse-4.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103469
Bug ID: 103469
Summary: [12 regression] c-c++-common/attr-retain-9.c fails
after r12-5483
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103477
Bug ID: 103477
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr103345.c fails after
r12-5453
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
Bug ID: 103479
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after
r12-5489
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 51907
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51907&action=edit
dec7 dump file
Dump file attached
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103521
Bug ID: 103521
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93032-mztools.c
broken after r12-5585
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103522
Bug ID: 103522
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in
r12-5649
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
301 - 400 of 791 matches
Mail list logo
