[Bug testsuite/98385] New: new test case g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C in r11-6257 has many fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98385 Bug ID: 98385 Summary: new test case g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C in r11-6257 has many fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98385] new test case g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C in r11-6257 has many fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98385 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug libstdc++/98389] New: [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98389 Bug ID: 98389 Summary: [11 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails after r11-6249 on powerpc64 big endian Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/98468] New: [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98468 Bug ID: 98468 Summary: [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594 Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug testsuite/98489] New: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr56719.c in r11-6374 has two failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98489 Bug ID: 98489 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr56719.c in r11-6374 has two failures Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/98493] New: [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98493 Bug ID: 98493 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/98493] [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98493 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/98468] [9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c fails starting with r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98468 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I only noticed it when looking at some stuff with 9.3.1. Is there a way to tie specific git revisions to a specific release?

[Bug testsuite/98575] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr94851-1.c fails after r11-6495

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98575 Bug ID: 98575 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr94851-1.c fails after r11-6495 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98589] New: [11 regression] Warning changes in gcc.dg/plugin/gil-1.c after r11-6508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98589 Bug ID: 98589 Summary: [11 regression] Warning changes in gcc.dg/plugin/gil-1.c after r11-6508 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98593] New: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593 Bug ID: 98593 Summary: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug testsuite/98593] [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug objc++/98606] New: [10 regression] obj-c++.dg/template-4.mm fails erratically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98606 Bug ID: 98606 Summary: [10 regression] obj-c++.dg/template-4.mm fails erratically Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug objc++/98606] [10 regression] obj-c++.dg/template-4.mm fails erratically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98606 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug testsuite/98622] New: [11 regression] new test case pr98273.C in r11-6577 doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98622 Bug ID: 98622 Summary: [11 regression] new test case pr98273.C in r11-6577 doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98643] New: [11 regression] r11-6615 causes failure in gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract- char.p7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98643 Bug ID: 98643 Summary: [11 regression] r11-6615 causes failure in gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract- char.p7.c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/98643] [11 regression] r11-6615 causes failure in gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract- char.p7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98643 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here's a context diff seurer@genoa:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ diff -c fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s.r11-6614 fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s.r11-6615 *** fold-vec-extract-char.p7.s.r11-6614 Tue Jan 12 14:

[Bug debug/98755] New: [11 regression] r11-6755 causes failure in g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98755 Bug ID: 98755 Summary: [11 regression] r11-6755 causes failure in g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/98757] New: New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98757 Bug ID: 98757 Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug testsuite/98643] [11 regression] r11-6615 causes failure in gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract- char.p7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98643 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/98325] [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLV

[Bug testsuite/98125] [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is still failing for me so I'd guess that Alan's patch is not submitted yet.

[Bug libgomp/98808] New: [11 regression] test case libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c hangs after r11-6752

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98808 Bug ID: 98808 Summary: [11 regression] test case libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c hangs after r11-6752 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug target/98827] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c assembler counts off after r11-6857

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98827 Bug ID: 98827 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c assembler counts off after r11-6857 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug target/98827] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c assembler counts off after r11-6857

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98827 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- On power 8 I used: configure --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power8 --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib On power 7 it was the same but --with-cpu=power7

[Bug bootstrap/98839] New: [11 regression] compilation failure for dwarf2asm.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98839 Bug ID: 98839 Summary: [11 regression] compilation failure for dwarf2asm.c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug bootstrap/98839] [11 regression] compilation failure for dwarf2asm.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98839 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/98839] [11 regression] compilation failure for dwarf2asm.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98839 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried that and it now compiles ok.

[Bug rtl-optimization/97684] [11 Regression] ICE in reg_preferred_class, at reginfo.c:789 by r11-4577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/98065] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_expand_vector_set, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7024 since r11-5457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/98870] New: [11 regression] assembler output count off for gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 after r11-6959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98870 Bug ID: 98870 Summary: [11 regression] assembler output count off for gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 after r11-6959 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug target/98870] [11 regression] assembler output count off for gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 after r11-6959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98870 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/98894] New: New test case experimental/simd/standard_abi_usable.cc in r11-6935 fails on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98894 Bug ID: 98894 Summary: New test case experimental/simd/standard_abi_usable.cc in r11-6935 fails on power 7 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug bootstrap/98923] New: [11 regression] bootstrap on powerpc64 fails after r11-6995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98923 Bug ID: 98923 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap on powerpc64 fails after r11-6995 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug other/98926] New: [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 Bug ID: 98926 Summary: [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This appears to be happening on powerpc64 BE. More ICEs and a traceback: g:6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795a67364d8, r11-7011 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg-torture.exp=g++.dg/torture/pr945

[Bug c++/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This one is from powerpc64 LE. Same traceback I think. g:6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795a67364d8, r11-7011 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="lto.exp=g++.dg/lto/pr65549_0.C" # of unexpected failu

[Bug c++/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- gcc112 is an LE machine and the ICEs were mostly on BE. Try it on gcc110 or 203 which appear to be BE. Looking through my logs I see I got different errors and ICEs on different LE machines. May

[Bug c++/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here was what I saw on a power 8 comparing r11-7010 with r11-7011: previous run: g:bec5dbae5649da4bd7ea2731a8446ac481cb78ab, r11-7010: 50 failures this run: g:6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795

[Bug c++/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/98979] New: [11 regression] ICE in several tests cases after r11-7112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98979 Bug ID: 98979 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in several tests cases after r11-7112 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/98979] [11 regression] ICE in several tests cases after r11-7112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98979 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- For completeness, the new test case added for this in g:b2d84e9f9cccbe4ee662f7002b83105629d09939, r11-7113 also fails: make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="goacc.exp=gfortran.dg/goacc/derived-chartype

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50168 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50168&action=edit Assembler output from broken revision

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Enabling -fno-forward-propagate triggers the problem. seurer@genoa:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-10-test$ whichgcc Now at commit g:a7eb97ad269b6509bd7b31ca373daea98e4d7e85, r10-135 seurer@genoa:~/gcc/git

[Bug target/68028] [8/9/10/11 regression] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point" with LTO on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/85899] [8 Regression] ICE in find_fallthru_edge_from, at haifa-sched.c:8059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85899 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/99084] New: New test case gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/multi-subreg-1.c added in r11-7223 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99084 Bug ID: 99084 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/multi-subreg-1.c added in r11-7223 fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/86096] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/20780] gcc 4.0 from cvs head fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20780 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/42431] [4.5 Regression] wrong code for 200.sixtrack with vectorization and -fdata-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42431 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED CC|

[Bug middle-end/21460] sjlj_emit_function_enter adds rtl to wrong block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21460 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| Status|VERIFIED

[Bug rtl-optimization/18420] [4.0 Regression] ICE compiling mesa at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18420 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED CC|

[Bug c/12738] Missing function with 'static' block-scope declaration; unit-at-a-time; and IMA.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12738 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED CC|

[Bug target/21761] [4.1 Regression] mainline gcc causing internal compiler error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21761 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED CC|

[Bug target/15720] [4.0 Regression] function marked inline which is called directly isn't emitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15720 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/99150] New: New tests in r11-7271 fail to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99150 Bug ID: 99150 Summary: New tests in r11-7271 fail to compile Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks, that did fix it on trunk.

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|F

[Bug testsuite/99173] New: new test case c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c added in r11-7284 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99173 Bug ID: 99173 Summary: new test case c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c added in r11-7284 fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/99173] new test case c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c added in r11-7284 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99173 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- There are actually a bunch more. Here's the full list: FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-retain-5.c -std=gnu++14 (test for excess

[Bug testsuite/99233] New: [11 regression] new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr96264.c in r11-7285 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99233 Bug ID: 99233 Summary: [11 regression] new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr96264.c in r11-7285 fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug other/99261] New: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc fails after r11-7365

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99261 Bug ID: 99261 Summary: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc fails after r11-7365 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/99261] [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc fails after r11-7365

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99261 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- char to_chars_buffer[output_length]; auto result = to_chars(to_chars_buffer, to_chars_buffer+output_length,

[Bug fortran/98979] [11 regression] ICE in several tests cases after r11-7112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98979 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I looked at the most recent powerpc64 runs (all varieties) and it is no longer failing there.

[Bug fortran/100276] New: [12 regression] Many failures after r12-119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100276 Bug ID: 100276 Summary: [12 regression] Many failures after r12-119 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fort

[Bug bootstrap/100327] New: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327 Bug ID: 100327 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-228 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/100327] [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug other/100338] New: [11 regression] Python error running test case after r11-2720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100338 Bug ID: 100338 Summary: [11 regression] Python error running test case after r11-2720 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/100338] [11/12 regression] Python error running test case after r11-2720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100338 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- On a system where things fail (Ubuntu 20.04.1): Python 2.7.18 GNU gdb (GDB) 11.0.50.20201107-git On a working system (Ubuntu 18.04.5): Python 2.7.17 GNU gdb (Ubuntu 8.1.1-0ubuntu1) 8.1.1

[Bug testsuite/100346] New: [11 regression] printf tests fail after r11-6755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100346 Bug ID: 100346 Summary: [11 regression] printf tests fail after r11-6755 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug testsuite/100364] New: New test case gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/cdivchkld.c in r12-228 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100364 Bug ID: 100364 Summary: New test case gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/cdivchkld.c in r12-228 fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100346] [11 regression] printf tests fail after r11-6755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100346 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It was failing with binutils 2.27 (I believe, it was the distro one) and when I switched to binutils 2.36.1 it works.

[Bug testsuite/100397] New: New test case libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 fails erratically since its introduction in r12-20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100397 Bug ID: 100397 Summary: New test case libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 fails erratically since its introduction in r12-20 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/100407] New: New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 Bug ID: 100407 Summary: New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug testsuite/100422] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/gomp/clause-3.C fails after r12-438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100422 Bug ID: 100422 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/gomp/clause-3.C fails after r12-438 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug testsuite/100484] New: [12 regression] Test case gcc.dg/sso-9.c fails after r12-622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100484 Bug ID: 100484 Summary: [12 regression] Test case gcc.dg/sso-9.c fails after r12-622 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/100514] New: [12 regression] Error in Ada build in bootstrap after r12-648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100514 Bug ID: 100514 Summary: [12 regression] Error in Ada build in bootstrap after r12-648 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/100568] New: [12 regression] ICE at gcc/tree-ssa.c:1214 after r12-657

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100568 Bug ID: 100568 Summary: [12 regression] ICE at gcc/tree-ssa.c:1214 after r12-657 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug testsuite/100569] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 Bug ID: 100569 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, there were a LOT of new warnings and such: previous run: g:227a2ecf663d69972b851f51f1934d18927b62cd, r12-741: 52 failures this run: g:7d7d925d0d799eb9dda4a6bd6162af0a7db9c98b, r12-742: 23

[Bug testsuite/100748] New: [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 Bug ID: 100748 Summary: [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100749] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 Bug ID: 100749 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug testsuite/100748] [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I do see it failing on at least one powerpc64 LE machine. PR97944 said it used to fail randomly.

[Bug testsuite/100750] New: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100750 Bug ID: 100750 Summary: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug other/100759] New: [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100759 Bug ID: 100759 Summary: [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/100759] [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100759 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- actually, there are a bunch of failures from this revision: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C -Os (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C -Os (internal compiler error) FAIL: g

[Bug testsuite/100750] new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100750 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- There are also some failures with gcc 11 including on power 10 LE. FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rop-3.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.ta

[Bug bootstrap/100820] New: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 Bug ID: 100820 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I got it to fail on the gcc110 gcc farm machine. g:659cc7d6320aae7ab390b5886f0efed22f78e244, r12-1164 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}' compile.exp=gcc.c-torture/compil

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It does not fail on LE.

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50922 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50922&action=edit assembler file

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -fdiag

[Bug target/100820] [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/100943] New: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256 fails with excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100943 Bug ID: 100943 Summary: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256 fails with excess errors Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 Bug ID: 100952 Summary: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also, this test FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 execution test only fails on power 10.

[Bug tree-optimization/101003] New: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1329

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101003 Bug ID: 101003 Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1329 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >