[Bug libgomp/92844] New: [10 regression] libgomp.fortran/use_device_ptr-optional-2.f90 fails after r279004

2019-12-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test

[Bug other/92784] [10 regression] ICE when compiling g++.dg/torture/pr59226.C after r278944

2019-12-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92784 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Could be the same thing. Perhaps you can check what changed with this revision to start this particular test failing.

[Bug other/92870] New: new test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-shift-5.c fails starting with its introduction in r279114

2019-12-09 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- xecuting on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/ /home/seurer

[Bug other/92871] New: new test case g++.dg/ext/temp-extend1.C fails starting with its introduction in r279069

2019-12-09 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test

[Bug other/92901] New: new test case c-c++-common/goacc/clause-locations.c in r279169 fails

2019-12-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/clause-locations.c -std=c++98 (test for warnings, line 12) FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/clause-locations.c

[Bug testsuite/92955] New: [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60505.c fails starting with r279392

2019-12-16 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc

[Bug other/92958] New: [10 regression] gfortran.dg/lto/pr87689_0.f fails starting with r279392

2019-12-16 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc

[Bug testsuite/92991] New: [10 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/vptr-4.C fails starting with r279473

2019-12-18 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g

[Bug other/92997] New: [10 regression] gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c fails starting with r279523

2019-12-18 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- # of expected passes15 # of unexpected failures1 FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

[Bug other/92958] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/lto/pr87689_0.f fails starting with r279392

2019-12-18 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92958 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I don't see the failure in my most current test run

[Bug target/93136] New: [10 regression] gcc.dg/vmx/ops.c and several other test break after r279772

2020-01-02 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This is the list for powerpc64 BE on a power 8. > FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/ops.c -O0 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.

[Bug testsuite/93139] New: new test case gfortran.dg/implied_shape_5.f90 fails

2020-01-02 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../ -B/home

[Bug testsuite/93189] New: [10 regression] Many test case failures starting with r279942

2020-01-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- FAIL: gcc.dg/pr71969-3.c scan-tree-dump-times einline "will not early inline" 8 FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/remref-2b.c scan-tre

[Bug testsuite/93189] [10 regression] Many test case failures starting with r279942

2020-01-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93189 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- And prevents 176.gcc in spec2000 from building c-lex.o: In function `init_lex': c-lex.c:(.text+0xb30): undefined reference to `is_reserved_word' c-lex.c:(.text+0xc68): undefined re

[Bug testsuite/93216] New: [10 regression] gcc.dg/optimize-bswaphi-1.c fails starting with r280034

2020-01-09 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc

[Bug testsuite/93216] [10 regression] gcc.dg/optimize-bswaphi-1.c fails starting with r280034

2020-01-09 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93216 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug ipa/93217] New: [10 regression] 29_atomics/atomic_ref/float.cc fails after r280040

2020-01-09 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Looks like it is getting a bad value when it runs. Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc

[Bug testsuite/93227] New: [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/std-layout1.C fails starting with r280065

2020-01-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- It is getting unexpected errors. Does it need to be updated? Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc

[Bug analyzer/93291] 'FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/pattern-test-2.c' for a few configurations

2020-01-20 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93291 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/93369] New: [10 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr64076 fails

2020-01-21 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- THIS STARTED WITH COMMIT 28307164dfed294855bf3d55bed357de560f083b spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++1/../../xg++ -B/home/seurer/gcc/git

[Bug ipa/93369] [10 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr64076 fails

2020-01-22 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Will do in the future re: using g: Should it also go in the Summary line? The hashes would make it quite long.

[Bug c++/40752] -Wconversion generates false warnings for operands not larger than target type

2020-01-22 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/93391] New: [10 regression] new test cases c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c and pr40752a.c fail

2020-01-22 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- > FAIL: c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c -Wc++-compat (test for warnings, > line 34) > FAIL: c-c

[Bug testsuite/93391] [10 regression] new test cases c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c and pr40752a.c fail

2020-01-22 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug other/93393] New: [10 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr93133.c fails

2020-01-22 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This started with g:865257c447cc50f5819e9b53da83145f3c36c305 Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc

[Bug other/93393] [10 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr93133.c fails

2020-01-22 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93393 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry, I accidentally cut off the test run output. I assume this doesn't change your analysis, though. Running it in gdb shows: Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x3fffb7cd24

[Bug testsuite/93391] [10 regression] new test cases c-c++-common/Wconversion-pr40752.c and pr40752a.c fail

2020-01-23 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93391 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yup, that fixed all the errors I was seeing on powerpc64.

[Bug testsuite/93460] New: [10 regression] new test case gcc.dg/torture/pr93170.c fails with excess errors in r10-6246

2020-01-27 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:150760dd6dd1899705790183d646fa5fc004554e r10-6246 FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr93170.c -O0 (test for

[Bug fortran/93501] New: [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 ICEs starting with r10-6294

2020-01-29 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:a83b5cc5828ee34471de415e8893242dd3b0a91b, r10-6295 FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL

[Bug target/33989] Extra load/store for float with union

2020-01-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug tree-optimization/34043] Missed optimization causing extra loads and stores when using x86_64 builtin function together with aggregate types.

2020-01-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34043 Bug 34043 depends on bug 33989, which changed state. Bug 33989 Summary: Extra load/store for float with union https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/42588] unnecessary move through x87 stack/local frame for union

2020-01-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42588 Bug 42588 depends on bug 33989, which changed state. Bug 33989 Summary: Extra load/store for float with union https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug testsuite/92415] new test case g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-scalar1-neg.C introduced in r277925 fails

2020-01-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92415 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/93501] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 ICEs starting with r10-6295

2020-01-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93501 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libgomp/92844] [10 regression] libgomp.fortran/use_device_ptr-optional-2.f90 fails after r279004

2020-02-03 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92844 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libgomp/92844] [10 regression] libgomp.fortran/use_device_ptr-optional-2.f90 fails after r279004

2020-02-03 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92844 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Make that... I see no failures after 2020-02-01.

[Bug target/93568] New: [10 regression] r10-6418 causes many ICEs

2020-02-04 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:e7f3e075282bda5c5df03e01932cf8d8e9b55cfc, r10-6418 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-longlong.p8.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract

[Bug target/93569] New: [10 regression] r10-6419 causes ICE in gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-15d.c

2020-02-04 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:fb47dc28d2d38f56af65e9f244af8870bd568b0b, r10-6419 spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B

[Bug fortran/93599] New: [9/10 regression] Bug in fortran asynchronous I/O wait function

2020-02-05 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The test case testsuite/libgomp.fortran/async_io_4.f90 fails erratically on powerpc64 often with thousands, even tens of thousands, of

[Bug target/92518] [10 regression] ppc rounding tests fail after r278207

2020-02-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92518 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu |powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug fortran/93599] [9/10 regression] Bug in fortran asynchronous I/O wait function

2020-02-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- While trying to figure out what was going on I tried the original test on several different machines including multiple power 8s and power 9s and it eventually would fail on any of them

[Bug fortran/93599] [9/10 regression] Bug in fortran asynchronous I/O wait function

2020-02-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I just tried the patch and am still seeing failures on at least some systems.

[Bug rtl-optimization/93658] [9/10 Regression] infinite loop building ghostscript and icu with -O3 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2020-02-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93658 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93599] [9/10 regression] Bug in fortran asynchronous I/O wait function

2020-02-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I ran the test 200,000 times on the same systems as before (p7 BE, p8 BE, 2 different p8 LE, and 2 different p9 LE) and all but one of them had at least 1 failure. One had 172. It looks like it

[Bug target/93709] New: [10 regression] fortran.dg/minlocval_4.f90 fails on power 9 after r10-4160

2020-02-12 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:cf20d00ca1ae5a0da9b329896d7b51e55381bdd7, r10-4160 fortran.dg/maxlocval_4.f90 also fails. This only happens on power 9

[Bug testsuite/93717] New: [10 Regression] gcc.dg/optimize-bswapsi-2.c fails after it was updated in r10-5832

2020-02-12 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:0f507a365777b403cf058ee1208bf41a7363a728, r10-5832 The test case was updated in this change and it now fails on

[Bug target/93738] New: [8/9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

2020-02-13 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- git g:8d2d39587d941a40f25ea0144cceb677df115040, r9-3594 ok, this is an old issue that slipped past unnoticed somehow. It was

[Bug target/93738] [8/9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

2020-02-13 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug target/93709] [10 regression] fortran.dg/minlocval_4.f90 fails on power 9 after r10-4160

2020-02-17 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93709 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- You are right, it was git g:6d099a76a0f6a040a3e678f2bce7fc69cc3257d8, r10-4161

[Bug fortran/93599] [9/10 regression] Bug in fortran asynchronous I/O wait function

2020-02-17 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599 --- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I ran the test with the patch on several systems that had previously seen a lot of failures. Even after running it several hundred thousand times there were no failures seen.

[Bug testsuite/93909] New: [10 regression] new test cases gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c and g++.dg/ipa/pr93763.C fail

2020-02-24 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr93763.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors

[Bug target/93913] New: [10 regression] r10-6762 breaks gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-st-*.c test cases

2020-02-24 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:e6f24f824beb8ba6805702e287bbd6153b472488, r10-6762 broke a few tests apparently only on power 9: FAIL: gcc.target

[Bug testsuite/93935] New: [9/10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-over-widen-2.c fails starting with r262371 (r10-6856)

2020-02-25 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- git g:68f8763d57ab6e90f9d78ec0b0e6b71241676a5c, r10-6856 This is probably a similar issue on power 7 for

[Bug target/94019] New: [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c fails starting with g:370c2ebe8fa20e0812cd2d533d4ed38ee2d37c85, r9-1590

2020-03-03 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This is an old issue that was never tracked down before. It

[Bug target/94023] New: [9 regerssion] gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-12.c fails starting with r9-5008

2020-03-03 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:6647c1e86f3b311d906a19b85182eed010ec03cf, r9-5008 This is an older failure that I previously missed. It only seems to occur on

[Bug target/88408] New: [9 regression] r266868 breaks gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c on powerpc64 LE

2018-12-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc

[Bug target/88408] [9 regression] r266868 breaks gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c on powerpc64 LE

2018-12-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88408 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64*-unknown-linux-gn

[Bug testsuite/88290] [9 regression] 23_containers/deque/erasure.cc fails after r266672

2018-12-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88290 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug testsuite/88436] New: [9 regression] r265421 causes gcc.target/powerpc/pr54240.c to fail

2018-12-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Looks like this test case may have been missed when updating those affected by the changes in this revision. spawn -ignore SIGHUP

[Bug testsuite/88454] New: [9 regression] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-5.c fails after r266971

2018-12-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc

[Bug testsuite/88491] New: new test case allocfail.sh in r267054 fails if dash is the default shell (/bin/sh)

2018-12-13 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- FAIL: allocfail.sh == /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-trunk/libbacktrace/allocfail.sh: 35: set: Illegal option

[Bug fortran/88678] New: [9 regression] Many gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_X.f90 test cases fail starting with r267465

2019-01-03 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- There are a bunch of the gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_X.f90 test cases that began failing with r267465: FAIL: gfortran.dg

[Bug fortran/88678] [9 regression] Many gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_X.f90 test cases fail starting with r267465

2019-01-03 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Program received signal SIGFPE: Floating-point exception - erroneous arithmetic operation. Backtrace for this error: #0 0x3fffb17f0477 in ??? #1 0x3fffb14f1694 in feenableexcept at

[Bug testsuite/88682] New: new test case c-c++-common/pr51628-10.c fails starting with its introduction in r267313

2019-01-03 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=c-c++-common/pr51628-10.c FAIL: c-c++-common/pr51628-10.c -Wc++-compat

[Bug testsuite/88697] New: New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr88457.c in r267307 fails because of glibc requirement

2019-01-04 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- It is failing because it requires GLIBC 2.23 and newer and some (most) of our test machines don't have

[Bug tree-optimization/88044] [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90 hangs after r266171

2019-01-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I looked at where the code is hanging and it looks like it is hung in a loop where it keeps calling memcpy with an incrementing by 1 length. I set a breakpoint at the start of memcpy to break

[Bug tree-optimization/88044] [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90 hangs after r266171

2019-01-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried both (1) and (2) and the test case does not hang.

[Bug tree-optimization/88044] [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90 hangs after r266171

2019-01-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044 --- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- None of those hang, either. I also experimented with the options a bit. The as-is options affecting optimization are: -O3 -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -finline-functions Change to -O1 and no

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New: New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-01-18 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect

[Bug testsuite/88920] New: [9 regression] GCC is not configured to support amdgcn-unknown-amdhsa as offload target

2019-01-18 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This error is generated scores of times, more than 100, when running a make check on powerpc64 (both BE and LE

[Bug testsuite/88920] [9 regression] GCC is not configured to support amdgcn-unknown-amdhsa as offload target

2019-01-18 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88920 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The configure is pretty simple: /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test2/configure --prefix=/home/seurer/gcc/install/gcc-test2 --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power8 --disable-bootstrap --with-as

[Bug testsuite/89064] New: [9 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-5.c fails starting with r268257

2019-01-25 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Does this test case need updating? spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that the change was backported to gcc 8 (r268578) and the test case fails there now the same way.

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tamar.christina at arm dot

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I did not add you to the CC list.

[Bug other/89243] New: ICE in new test case g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C from r268647

2019-02-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r268647 | jakub | 2019-02-07 08:55:50 -0600 (Thu, 07 Feb 2019) | 11 lines Backported

[Bug testsuite/85306] New: [8 regression] The test cases gcc.dg/pr80463.c, g++.dg/pr80463.C, and gcc.dg/pr83972.c all fail in r259231

2018-04-09 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- These are new test cases introduced in r259231 and they all fail on

[Bug other/85327] New: [8 regression] experimental/source_location/1.cc began failing with r259278

2018-04-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/./gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/85354] New: [8 regression] ICE with gcc.dg/graphite/pr84872.c starting with r259313

2018-04-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc

[Bug c++/85355] New: new test case g++.dg/warn/Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant-7.C fails

2018-04-11 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- It looks like it is compiling with -std=gnu++98 but using a feature only supported in later standards. spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer

[Bug tree-optimization/81184] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr21643.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c fail starting with r249450

2018-04-12 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I dug through my logs and the last failures I saw for phi-opt-11.c and pr21643.c on powerpc64 were in mid January immediately before Eric's patch.

[Bug middle-end/85383] New: [8 regression] many ICE failures at gcc/toplev.c:325 starting with r259346

2018-04-12 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- See this on powerpc64 both LE and BE. One example: spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/g

[Bug sanitizer/85394] [8 Regression] Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES

2018-04-17 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85394 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |seurer at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/85579] New: [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

2018-04-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Sorry, I don't know enough about fortran to know whether there is something wrong with the test

[Bug tree-optimization/85579] [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

2018-04-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64

[Bug libgomp/85639] New: ICE in compiling new test cases added in r259850

2018-05-03 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: libgomp Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- > FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/builtin-goacc-parlevel-id-size.c -std=c++11 > (internal compiler error) > FAIL: c-c++-com

[Bug other/85857] New: configure problem using local mpfr and gmp

2018-05-21 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- There is a problem with configure if you use a local copy of mpfr and gmp (grabbed via contrib/download_prerequisites) and then use --enable-decimal-float on the configure for gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/85863] New: [9 Regression] ICE in compiling spec2006 fortran test case solib.fppized.f starting with r260283

2018-05-21 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I think the test case (part of 416.gamess) is generated by the spec2006 test run as it appears

[Bug testsuite/85865] New: [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433

2018-05-21 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- There are a whole bunch of fortran tests that fail starting with r260433. This is (I believe) the whole list: FAIL

[Bug testsuite/85865] [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433

2018-05-21 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85865 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- r260433 | janus | 2018-05-21 01:45:55 -0500 (Mon, 21 May 2018) | 42 lines 2018-05-21 Janus Weil PR fortran/85841 * gfortran.dg/g77/19990826-3.f: Add option "-std=l

[Bug other/85888] New: New test case c-c++-common/attr-nonstring-6.c from r260541 fails with excess errors

2018-05-23 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I saw this on powerpc64 both LE and BE but I don't think it is target system specific. FAIL: c-c++-common

[Bug testsuite/85888] [9 Regression] New test case c-c++-common/attr-nonstring-6.c from r260541 fails with excess errors

2018-05-23 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85888 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- or maybe it is system specific as I wasn't able to duplicate on an x86 system

[Bug target/85894] PPC64LE alloca stack slot allocation allows memset to destroy the stack

2018-05-24 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85894 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/85911] New: [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638

2018-05-24 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Looks like the the one variation doesn't work in the test case update: # of expected passes8 # of unexp

[Bug lto/86004] New: [9 regression] Several lto test cases begin failing with r260963

2018-05-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- This started with r260963 but that specific revision won't build properly because of an

[Bug lto/86004] [9 regression] Several lto test cases begin failing with r260963

2018-05-31 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry about that. The actual complaints are about a missing plugin from the loader. I've never seen anything like that before. gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.log:/usr/bin/ld:

[Bug lto/86004] [9 regression] Several lto test cases begin failing with r260963

2018-05-31 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried a couple of different versions of binutils on one system where this was occurring and it happens with binutils 2.26 but doesn't with 2.27 (and later).

[Bug testsuite/86016] New: New tests for r260978 report excess errors

2018-05-31 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Some of the new tests are reporting excess errors like this: # of expected passes14 # of unexpected failures7 FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/pr55976-1.c -O0

[Bug testsuite/85888] [9 Regression] New test case c-c++-common/attr-nonstring-6.c from r260541 fails with excess errors

2018-06-04 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85888 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This same error just popped up on gcc 8 (r261152 for gcc 8 backported r260541 for trunk) so don't forget about this fix as well.

[Bug libfortran/86070] New: [7 regression] gfortran.dg/fmt_zero_digits.f90 segmentation fault starting with r261077

2018-06-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-7/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/home/seurer/gcc

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >