https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 06:43:20 2015
New Revision: 230786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Handle aborts in is_parallel_of_n_reg_sets (PR68381)
Some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67677
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed, mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 21:23:25 2015
New Revision: 230843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
shrink-wrap: Fix thinko (PR68520)
Part of the shrink-wrapping algor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2015-11-24
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed. The loops start out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68523
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Scratch that, ch changes the loop but is not the culprit.
Note there is one further edge at expand time: 2->9 with prob 0%.
This is created by unswitch. The transform is fine afaics, but it
doesn't upd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41868
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I'm closing this bug. If there is some other (still supported) case we
do not support well, please open a new bug report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36557
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Jan 8 03:46:41 2015
New Revision: 219336
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219336&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/36557
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*eqsi3_ext, *nesi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63949
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892
--- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Current code:
add 3,3,4
subfc 4,4,3
subfe 9,9,9
subf 3,9,3
so we got rid of the useless register move.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64505
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi Markus,
How often is rs6000_stack_info called there? Are there any hotspots
in the function?
Do you have a standalone testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892
--- Comment #21 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Mainine (will be GCC 5 in a few months).
There is no addcc thing, that is not suitable for PowerPC.
The big changes are in though (and they are much bigger than
I originally thought, fwiw -- scope cree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892
--- Comment #23 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Do you know what addcc does? PowerPC does not have any instruction
that behaves like it at all. So it would have to expand to a big
fat sequence of instructions, that then hopefully are optimised to
s
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, distribute_notes messes up if it has a REG_DEAD note while that
same reg is set later, and ends up as I2 in the combination result.
I am testing a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi again,
Unfortunately it seems I am unable to build a version of GCC that is
compatible with that (every version I tried either complains or ICEs).
Maybe you can answer the above questions yourself?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Jan 22 00:35:44 2015
New Revision: 219981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64682
* combine.c (distribute_notes): Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
[ I missed your last comment, sorry. ]
Both the log_links and the reg_stat point to insns in the insn stream,
(all of those are either live or never again referred to), so that
might be fine, but you re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It's not a very new regression, and it is quite risky in my opinion;
I prefer to have this dealt with in stage1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jan 30 05:35:52 2015
New Revision: 220272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64580
* config.rs6000/rs6000.c (compute_vrsave_ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Also note that doing GC during the pass will not reduce the compile
time or the amount of garbage created at all, so won't fix the actual
problem; it does of course make it more bearable on smaller mach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
sms-1.c fails with -m32 -mpowerpc64 in a similar way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225
--- Comment #22 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Feb 3 12:15:32 2015
New Revision: 220370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61225
gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c: XFAIL for ia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 5 15:01:49 2015
New Revision: 220453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64580
Backport from mainline
* config.rs6000/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 5 15:06:40 2015
New Revision: 220454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64580
Backport from mainline
* config.rs6000/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I'll take it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
Severity|normal
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It now fails for my newlib target. Disabling the isctype.cc "fix"
makes it work again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It turns out I built with config/os/generic, since I do not configure
--with-newlib. It still is newlib though, and the dejagnu test knows
that. Impedance mismatch, kaboom. It also seems that isctype
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
||2014-11-16
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #3 from Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60111
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 20 16:03:16 2014
New Revision: 217883
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217883&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-20 Segher Boessenkool
PR target/60111
* config/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I configured for sh4-linux, foolishly thinking that sh4-nofpu would
work with that as well. Why not build all "regular" multilibs for
every "regular" config? Maybe keep sh5, sh2a separate, I dunno (I
n
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to #c3)
That is because the patch in #c1 is incorrect.
Mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Nov 28 16:25:33 2014
New Revision: 218164
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218164&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64093
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (and3): Don't gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59278
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Dec 1 23:48:26 2014
New Revision: 218250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/59278
combine (reg_dead_at_p): Consider
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 3 06:00:54 2014
New Revision: 218302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52714
* combine.c (try_combine): Allow
Assignee: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: powerpc*-*-*
In current mainline, every RTL instruction that uses XER[CA] (the
carry bit) will have to set it in the same instruction, because
other instructions clobber it at will. Those RTL insns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55351
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes it was. Thanks for fixing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 10 18:28:57 2014
New Revision: 218589
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218589&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64180
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (TARGET_MD_ASM_CLOB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 10 18:30:07 2014
New Revision: 218590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64180
* config/rs6000/darwin.md (macho_low_si): Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 10 18:31:15 2014
New Revision: 218591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64180
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*ctr_internal1, *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 10 18:32:15 2014
New Revision: 218592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64180
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*add3_internal1):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 10 18:33:26 2014
New Revision: 218593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64180
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*add3_internal1):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 10 18:36:18 2014
New Revision: 218594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64180
* config/rs6000/predicates.md (adde_operand)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 10 18:37:58 2014
New Revision: 218595
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218595&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64180
* config/rs6000/predicates.md (unsigned_comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64268
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Dec 19 19:55:32 2014
New Revision: 218971
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218971&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64268
* combine.c (try_combine): Immediately retur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64358
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Sat Dec 20 15:37:06 2014
New Revision: 218989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64358
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_split_logic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36557
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Still happens. It now does
cntlzw 3,3
srwi 3,3,5
xori 3,3,0x1
rldicl 3,3,0,63
blr
which is better but not exactly ideal yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|middle-end |target
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It's a target problem. I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2014-08-10
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
GCC already does this
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-08-16
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed, on powerpc64 with default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62111
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
-nd is the default if not using -r. Something seems
to be amiss with your installation of wget?
||2014-08-24
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2014-08-24
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This problem goes away (or is hidden) when we also
have cstoresi4 for TARGET_POWERPC64.
I have
||2014-09-03
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed. Happens with -m32 -mno-lra only.
bswapdi2_32bit only allows "Z" for memor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63165
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Sep 4 22:53:01 2014
New Revision: 214924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214924&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-04 Segher Boessenkool
PR target/63165
* config/r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63165
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63187
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Sep 5 19:17:08 2014
New Revision: 214976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-05 Segher Boessenkool
PR target/63187
* config/r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63187
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2014-09-06
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I cannot reproduce this. You have --enable-languages=c and it fails in java?
... Oh never mind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Sep 9 18:49:08 2014
New Revision: 215091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Segher Boessenkool
PR target/63195
* config/r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2014-09-13
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes. The patch submission already mentioned this.
The SMS testcases need some maintenance (not
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-09-24
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed. We need
#define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Oct 2 02:18:01 2014
New Revision: 215789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215789&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-01 Segher Boessenkool
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/6215
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Shrink-wrapping should not put the prologue in the middle of a loop.
It can take a BB inside a loop as the block to put the prologue on,
but in that case (as in any other case) it duplicates all blocks
t
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I'll take it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I cannot reproduce the problem, #c2, not with any flags I tried,
not with a 20151122 compiler either. Help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, I'm cross-compiling.
The only differences I see are:
* -fdwarf2-cfi-asm; this seemed promising but makes no difference.
* -mtune=generic -march=x86-64; but no dice.
* Very different ggc settings.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68634
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68695
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
||2015-12-08
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed. The problem is there are no patterns for
(ior (and (reg const)) (and (reg const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Revision: 231547
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Dec 10 23:57:54 2015
--
--- svn:log (origi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Dec 11 00:27:14 2015
New Revision: 231552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231552&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix shrink-wrapping bug (PR67778, PR68634)
After shrink-wrapping h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68634
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Dec 11 00:27:14 2015
New Revision: 231552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231552&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix shrink-wrapping bug (PR67778, PR68634)
After shrink-wrapping ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anton at samba dot org
--- Comment
2101 - 2200 of 3229 matches
Mail list logo
