[Bug other/91085] fixincludes breaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- PR80005 is not relevant here.

[Bug go/93679] New: gccgo cannot bootstrap go1.14

Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: cmang at google dot com Target Milestone: --- When trying to bootstrap go1.14 from the release-branch.go1.14 branch with gccgo-10 I'm getting this error: + ./cmd/dist/dist bootstrap -a -v -d Buildi

[Bug other/91085] fixincludes breaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- Yes, nothing has changed.

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] [9/10 regression] Combine duplicates instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab --- gcc.target/aarch64/pr93565.c fails with -mabi=ilp32.

[Bug translation/93759] Invalid % in param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Apparently the problem is that "% p" looks like a valid c-format.

[Bug c/93850] 'stack smashing detected' in the special index for an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93850 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/93850] 'stack smashing detected' in the special index for an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93850 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 93849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/93849] 'Segmentation fault' in the special index for an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93849 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93880] missing test for diagnostic: %s%#qD (reversed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93880 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- You can use {\(reversed\)} instead.

[Bug c/93894] -Wimplicit-fallthrough false warning with operator %

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93894 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- case -1 is missing.

[Bug c/93910] -Waddress-of-packed-member triggered without actual access to a member or the address of a member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93910 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- You are still converting an unaligned pointer to an aligned pointer, and the address of a struct is the same as the address if its first member (with suitable conversion).

[Bug c/93910] -Waddress-of-packed-member triggered without actual access to a member or the address of a member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93910 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- The packed attribute forces the alignment to 1, so there is no requirement for its address to be aligned for its type.

[Bug inline-asm/93942] [Extended-Asm] Last code snippet in 6.47.2.3 Output Operands is unsafe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93942 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- M68K has memory to memory moves.

[Bug c++/56220] g++ failed to initialize a __thread local bool variable.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56220 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIX

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIX

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab 2013-02-09 20:48:07 UTC --- The others were already loaded via libgo.exp. Looking for ../../../../gcc/libgo/testsuite/../../gcc/testsuite/lib/prune.exp Found ../../../../gcc/libgo/testsuite/../../gcc/te

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab 2013-02-09 20:49:39 UTC --- # DejaGnu does not have proper library search paths for load_lib. # We have to explicitly load everything that go.exp wants to load.

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab 2013-02-09 21:03:35 UTC --- mv: cannot stat ‘.././libgo/libgo.sum’: No such file or directory mv: cannot stat ‘.././libgo/libgo.log’: No such file or directory cat: .././libgo/libgo.sum.sep: No such file

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab 2013-02-10 11:55:48 UTC --- testsuite/libgo.{log,sum} contains only a single test run (the last one).

[Bug bootstrap/56311] gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2013-02-14 11:05:32 UTC --- See fixincludes/inclhack.def, it looks like this is from hackname = hpux10_stdio_declarations, and select = "^#[ \t]*define _iob[ \t]*__iob" needs to be made more strict so tha

[Bug c/56399] Adding int to float generates incorrect results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/56509] New: [4.8 regression] gnattols build failure

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc-*-* ../../xgcc -B../../ -static-libgcc -I- -I../rts -I. -I/daten/gcc/gcc-20130302/gcc/ada -DIN_GCC -O2

[Bug bootstrap/56509] [4.8 regression] gnattols build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56509 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug bootstrap/56509] [4.8 regression] gnattools build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56509 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2013-03-04 19:50:07 UTC --- This is working.

[Bug libstdc++/56587] New: [4.8 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails for powerpc

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc*-*-* For -m32: 3 added symbols 0 _ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEj

[Bug libstdc++/56587] [4.8 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails for powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56587 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/56600] loop goes indefinite when non-loop integer variable overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56600 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56672] Bad optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2013-03-21 09:21:59 UTC --- A program that depends on undefined behaviour cannot be correct.

[Bug tree-optimization/56733] [4.9 regression] src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc:620:3: ICE tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_ty

|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-03-26 Component|libstdc++ |tree-optimization CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org, ||sch...@linux-m68k.org

[Bug tree-optimization/56733] [4.9 regression] src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc:620:3: ICE tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_ty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab 2013-03-26 11:10:50 UTC --- Probably fixed by: >From 96a1fa3ac96f6b9339091249b40fd72783532397 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: law Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 04:00:20 + Subject: [PATCH] * tree-

[Bug tree-optimization/56733] [4.9 regression] src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc:620:3: ICE tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_ty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #22 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-03 09:27:28 UTC --- That breaks g++.dg/tree-ssa/ehcleanup-1.C $ grep Removing ehcleanup-1.C.032t.ehcleanup1 Removing unreachable region 1 Removing unreachable region 2 Removing unreachable r

[Bug tree-optimization/56812] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-04 09:35:51 UTC --- The test is failing on ia64: $ grep basic slp-pr56812.cc.115t.slp /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20130404/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc:16: note: not vectorized: unsupported

[Bug tree-optimization/56812] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-04 17:24:14 UTC --- Yes, that will skip the test.

[Bug target/56864] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

classified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc-*-*

[Bug target/56865] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4

classified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc*-*-* Created

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-07 15:26:32 UTC --- The test was run with r197541.

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-07 16:30:10 UTC --- Neither r196686 nor r197531 are revisions on the trunk.

[Bug tree-optimization/56900] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp87.c scan-tree-dump vrp2 "Folded into: if.*"

ion: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: l...@gcc.gnu.org Target: m68k-*-* Created

[Bug tree-optimization/56900] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp87.c scan-tree-dump vrp2 "Folded into: if.*"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56900 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-10 08:23:59 UTC --- Created attachment 29848 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29848 vrp87.c.128t.cddce2

[Bug rtl-optimization/56957] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in add_insn_after, at emit-rtl.c:3783

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: ste...@gcc.gnu.org Target: ia64-*-* spawn /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20130414/Build/gcc

[Bug web/55933] Missing attachment download link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55933 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/28865] Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong .size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|-

[Bug other/57069] cmake compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57069 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-25 12:47:24 UTC --- Someone forcefully killed cc1plus, and the assembler error is just due to the incomplete input. Does FreeBSD have an OOM killer like Linux?

[Bug bootstrap/57076] @ in the src directory name causes failure while building of gcc.info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57076 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-26 10:15:31 UTC --- The rule to generate gcc-vers.texi needs to replace @ by @@ when writing out the definition of srcdir.

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-01 20:07:45 UTC --- Still failing.

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-02 10:37:53 UTC --- r196872 it is.

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-02 14:25:09 UTC --- There is a long standing bug with VLA types (see bug 28865) that has a similar effect.

[Bug tree-optimization/57144] New: [4.9 regression] mpfr miscompiled after r198413

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: l...@gcc.gnu.org Depends on: 57124 Target: ia64-*-* r198413 is causing

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-02 16:19:57 UTC --- Created attachment 30003 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30003 r196871 dump

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-02 16:36:18 UTC --- Created attachment 30005 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30005 r196872 dump

[Bug tree-optimization/57144] [4.9 regression] mpfr miscompiled after r198413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug preprocessor/41329] -M does not properly escape special characters.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41329 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-07 12:14:50 UTC --- This is not true. POSIX does not *require* support for colon in a filename, but supporting it as an extension is perfectly ok.

[Bug target/54226] Executables compiled with -pie do not work on NetBSD/sparc or sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54226 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/54233] New: FAIL: runtime/pprof

Component: go AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc64-*-* --- FAIL: pprof_test.TestCPUProfile (1.90 seconds) pprof_test.go:83: did not find ChecksumIEEE in the profile FAIL FAIL: runtime/pprof ../../../../libgo/testsuite/gotest: line

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54288] Wrong sign compiled at run-time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54288 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab 2012-08-16 22:26:11 UTC --- *** Bug 54291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/54305] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/m68k/pr36134.c scan-assembler lea

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: m68k-*-* @@ -7,31 +7,29 @@ f: link.w %fp,#0 move.l a,%a1 - move.l %a3,-(%sp) move.l

[Bug other/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54385] New: [4.8 regression] ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:873

: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: ste...@gcc.gnu.org Target: m68k-*-* Created

[Bug c++/54459] [4.8 regression] Bootstrap fails with "aliased to undefined symbol"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/54453] [4.8 Regression] r190783 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dougmencken at gmail dot

[Bug debug/54460] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-3.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-09-02 18:12:21 UTC --- This uses yet another comment character.

[Bug libstdc++/54530] New: [4.8 regression] error: std::piecewise_construct causes a section type conflict with std::piecewise_construct

: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: a...@google.com, fdum

[Bug libstdc++/54530] [4.8 regression] error: std::piecewise_construct causes a section type conflict with std::piecewise_construct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54530 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|aaw at googl

[Bug c++/53475] [4.8 Regression] Section type conflict errors in libstdc++ testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #8

[Bug rtl-optimization/54555] New: (set (REGX) (CONST_INT B)) -> (set (STRICT_LOW_PART (REGX)) (CONST_INT B)) is pessimising

8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: m68k-*-* Postreload (reload_cse_move2add) transforms (set (REGX) (CONST_IN

[Bug c/54558] get wrong answer in {static int a; a = 4; a += (a++);}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54558 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/54587] Error with constant in arithmetic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54587 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bratsinot at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/54590] Incorrect multi-inheritence bases layout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54590 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/54591] sscanf format no more working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54591 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug web/54651] Bugzilla sending broken emails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54651 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-09-21 10:03:10 UTC --- See .

[Bug c/54708] library must be placed after source for gcc to see it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2012-09-26 07:19:41 UTC --- Library arguments are position dependent, and must always be placed after the objects that reference them.

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg"

ion: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: uweig...@gcc.gnu.org Target: m68k-*-* gc

[Bug c/54743] Large loop runs endingless

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54743 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54780] G++ does not find precompiled headers in some cases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54780 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-03 13:10:32 UTC --- > I guess this is not a big issue if you are using Autotools, where the > established practice is to compile inside the source directory. It is common practice to build outsi

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eager at eagercon dot com,

[Bug go/54233] FAIL: runtime/pprof

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54233 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gcov-profile/44728] gcov chokes when "." is present in DIR argument to -o flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44728 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/54964] -MMD is silently ignored with -x assembler (or inferred language from .s extension)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54964 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-18 06:57:50 UTC --- The dependency file is created by the preprocessor, which isn't even run for a .s file.

[Bug c++/54972] O2 breaks something in 4.6.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54972 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-18 11:25:00 UTC --- lzo_gcc_test.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’: lzo_gcc_test.cpp:44:44: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] lzo_gcc

[Bug c++/54972] O2 breaks something in 4.6.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54972 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] New: [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: ste...@gcc.gnu.org Target: m68k-*-* Created attachment 28496 --> h

[Bug target/32381] m68k undefined symbol __cmpsf2_internal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32381 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/37680] ICE: unable to generate reloads for: (insn:QI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37680 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/28925] problem with zero_extract during gcse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28925 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/28882] Use more register name macros in m68k port

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28882 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/36772] GCC generates impossible BRANCH instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36772 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/55090] New: [4.8 regression] ICE in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:269

: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: hubi...@gcc.gnu.org Target: m68k

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-28 15:30:37 UTC --- What exactly did you test? The bug is clearly present before r192890. Here is the diff between r192889 and r192890: @@ -1663,16 +1663,17 @@ _Z6test01v: .cfi_startproc

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-28 15:36:55 UTC --- Created attachment 28546 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28546 wait.ii.203r.ira.r192889

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-28 15:38:09 UTC --- Created attachment 28547 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28547 wait.ii.203r.ira.r192890

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-28 18:34:52 UTC --- I didn't write anything about -fPIC. The PIC register is used for TLS accesses.

[Bug tree-optimization/55187] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr49960.c scan-tree-dump-times parloops "SUCCESS: may be parallelized" 0

classified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: hubi...@g

[Bug tree-optimization/55188] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr19105.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests v_[0-9]*.D. -.2, 2. and -.3, 4.[\n\r]* into" 1

to" 1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linu

[Bug tree-optimization/55187] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr49960.c scan-tree-dump-times parloops "SUCCESS: may be parallelized" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55187 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|m68k-*-*| --- Comment #1 from Andreas S

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >