--- Comment #3 from saurabh dot verma at codito dot com 2005-11-17 10:05
---
Adding myself to CC list, as the offending patch was given by me
--
saurabh dot verma at codito dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from saurabh dot verma at codito dot com 2007-07-17 11:50
---
This is fixed on mainline with the following patch.
-- trunk/gcc/config/h8300/h8300.c 2005/06/25 01:22:41 101314
+++ trunk/gcc/config/h8300/h8300.c 2006/08/28 13:51:04 116509
@@ -5746,4
--- Additional Comments From saurabh dot verma at codito dot com
2005-03-23 15:24 ---
Filed a patch on gcc-patches to fix this.
When optimizations are enabled, the arc backend generates a single instruction
loop for such code. The loop count register is checked only at the end of the
--- Additional Comments From saurabh dot verma at codito dot com
2005-06-10 08:50 ---
Posted the patch on gcc-patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00951.html
Cannot commit/change bug status, since i don't have the required permissions
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Additional Comments From saurabh dot verma at codito dot com
2005-06-10 18:29 ---
Marking as waiting for feedback (See patch link above)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From saurabh dot verma at codito dot com
2005-06-10 18:32 ---
Patch waiting for feedback
Can we update the status for this bug as "waiting for feedback"
( I do not have the required permissions )
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From saurabh dot verma at codito dot com
2005-06-13 12:50 ---
This patch has gone into the 3.4 branch
t-arc revision 1.7.12.1
Can be marked as resolved/FIXED ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17889
lot of warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: saurabh dot verma at codito dot
--- Additional Comments From saurabh dot verma at codito dot com 2004-10-14 07:53
---
Agreed. Used dummy define_predicates to check. The warnings are due to the lack of
them only.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17943