[Bug middle-end/21110] incorrect documentat for high and lo_sum RTL operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21110 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 12 19:08:37 2018 New Revision: 266035 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266035&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-12 Sandra Loosemore PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/21110] incorrect documentat for high and lo_sum RTL operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21110 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug preprocessor/47823] #pragma once is documented in a weird spot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47823 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Nov 13 02:06:30 2018 New Revision: 266043 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266043&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-12 Sandra Loosemore PR preprocess

[Bug preprocessor/47823] #pragma once is documented in a weird spot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47823 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c/49674] Improve documentation for __attribute__ __section__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49674 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug other/57700] doc: improperly named node about Diagnostic Messages Formatting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57700 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug middle-end/59634] Documentation (info/man page): lack of information for cache size parameters (--param)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59634 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Nov 13 03:40:53 2018 New Revision: 266048 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266048&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-13 Sandra Loosemore PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/59634] Documentation (info/man page): lack of information for cache size parameters (--param)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59634 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug driver/88024] New: At -O0 and -Og, GCC should warn if you explicitly try to enable an option that is ignored

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- While poking at documentation issue PR59658, I realized that there is a code bug in the handling of optimization

[Bug middle-end/59658] Document -f* flags enabled by -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/59658] Document -f* flags enabled by -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Nov 14 20:05:13 2018 New Revision: 266162 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266162&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-14 Sandra Loosemore PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/59658] Document -f* flags enabled by -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug debug/82738] [meta-bug] issues with the -Og optimization level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738 Bug 82738 depends on bug 59658, which changed state. Bug 59658 Summary: Document -f* flags enabled by -Og https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug debug/82738] [meta-bug] issues with the -Og optimization level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/61727] #pragma simd is undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61727 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/55102] The options -flto and -On do not behave as described in GCC docs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 15 00:41:10 2018 New Revision: 266168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266168&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-14 Sandra Loosemore PR l

[Bug lto/56700] Optimizing at compile and link result in different binary size than only optimizing at link time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56700 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 15 00:41:10 2018 New Revision: 266168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266168&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-14 Sandra Loosemore PR l

[Bug lto/55102] The options -flto and -On do not behave as described in GCC docs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/56334] __attribute__((aligned)) documentation is misleading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56334 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 15 02:55:26 2018 New Revision: 266170 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266170&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-15 Sandra Loosemore PR oth

[Bug other/56334] __attribute__((aligned)) documentation is misleading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56334 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/83546] -march=silvermont doesn't enable rdrnd by default despite what docs say

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83546 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c++/25759] Documentation not clear, attribute packed on class in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25759 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Fri Nov 16 00:50:41 2018 New Revision: 266199 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266199&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-15 Sandra Loosemore PR c

[Bug c++/25759] Documentation not clear, attribute packed on class in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25759 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug middle-end/23197] Improve documentation on -fprofile-generate, -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23197 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sat Nov 17 00:53:17 2018 New Revision: 266231 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266231&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-16 Sandra Loosemore PR middle-e

[Bug web/71666] profile-generate not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666 Bug 71666 depends on bug 23197, which changed state. Bug 23197 Summary: Improve documentation on -fprofile-generate, -fprofile-use https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23197 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/23197] Improve documentation on -fprofile-generate, -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23197 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c++/4025] Document use/non-use of -fno-implicit-templates in bootflags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4025 --- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sat Nov 17 16:05:45 2018 New Revision: 266239 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266239&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-17 Sandra Loosemore PR

[Bug c++/4025] Document use/non-use of -fno-implicit-templates in bootflags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4025 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c++/4225] documentation about CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH vs. system headers incomplete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4225 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sat Nov 17 16:59:26 2018 New Revision: 266240 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266240&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-17 Sandra Loosemore PR

[Bug c++/4225] documentation about CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH vs. system headers incomplete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4225 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC

[Bug c++/29188] undocumented extension with ambiguous between conversion function/constructor. related to const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29188 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug driver/30091] specs file: `@LANGUAGE' not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/31357] document that --help and --help= options cannot be combined.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31357 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sun Nov 18 04:09:14 2018 New Revision: 266246 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266246&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-17 Eric Gallager Sandra L

[Bug driver/31357] document that --help and --help= options cannot be combined.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31357 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/36062] -mpc32,-mpc64, and -mpc80 are not documented properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36062 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/37549] gcc -E -dD prints predefined macros, contrary to docs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37549 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/38801] libgcc exception handling routines need documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38801 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug other/40498] no_instrument_function attribute not documented to prevent -pg instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40498 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 19 01:04:04 2018 New Revision: 266260 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266260&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-18 Sandra Loosemore PR oth

[Bug other/40498] no_instrument_function attribute not documented to prevent -pg instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40498 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug lto/41528] LTO needs better internal and user documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41528 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/42305] Inconsistent description of -O1 and -finline-small-functions options in documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42305 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug driver/44933] --help=common undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44933 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c/46636] attribute aligned is documented as using bytes, uses addressable units instead.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46636 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/49370] flags implemented in the specs file but undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49370 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug driver/50250] Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250 --- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 19 21:53:09 2018 New Revision: 266287 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266287&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-19 Sandra Loosemore PR driv

[Bug driver/50250] Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c/52382] Atomic builtins documentation, page not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/53182] GNU C: attributes without underscores should be discouraged / no longer be documented e.g. as examples

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53182 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/88144] New: remove long-obsolete syntax for designated initializers

Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The GCC manual documents alternative syntax for designated initializers that it describes as "obsolete since GCC 2.5". It appears this synta

[Bug c++/88158] New: Document designated initializer support in C++

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The GCC manual section on designated initializers says "This extension is not implemented in GNU C++." But, by experimentation, I found that g++ does accept the

[Bug c++/88158] Document designated initializer support in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88158 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com

[Bug c/53608] Documentation could be clearer about designated initializers of unions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53608 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Fri Nov 23 05:18:19 2018 New Revision: 266402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266402&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-22 Sandra Loosemore Alan Coo

[Bug c/88144] remove long-obsolete syntax for designated initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88144 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that I also filed PR 88158 about the manual still saying C++ doesn't support designated initializers at all. It's clear that's incorrect, but it's not clear to me what it should say instead.

[Bug c/53608] Documentation could be clearer about designated initializers of unions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53608 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug other/54265] Documentation of "preferred attribute syntax for Types" contradicts examples in info.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54265 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug other/54265] Documentation of "preferred attribute syntax for Types" contradicts examples in info.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54265 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, if there is an actual rationale for the preferred position and it wasn't just an accidental extrapolation, I will change the examples to conform to that instead. Maybe also includ

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 --- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Right, I was expecting there would be a few of them that grep/sed would miss because of line breaks. I can hand-patch the ones I can find, but it's not the end of the world if a few e

[Bug other/54265] Documentation of "preferred attribute syntax for Types" contradicts examples in info.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54265 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sun Nov 25 21:10:34 2018 New Revision: 266440 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266440&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-25 Sandra Loosemore PR oth

[Bug other/54265] Documentation of "preferred attribute syntax for Types" contradicts examples in info.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54265 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug web/79738] Documentation for __attribute__((const)) slightly misleading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79738 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 26 01:38:00 2018 New Revision: 266445 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266445&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-25 Sandra Loosemore PR w

[Bug web/79738] Documentation for __attribute__((const)) slightly misleading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79738 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug sanitizer/56682] -fsanitize documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/57166] Manual no longer documents -Wmissing-noreturn alias for -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57166 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 26 03:44:38 2018 New Revision: 266446 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266446&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-25 Sandra Loosemore PR

[Bug c/57166] Manual no longer documents -Wmissing-noreturn alias for -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57166 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c/57182] Documentation implies -fprofile-arcs required to create .text.unlikely sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57182 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 26 18:22:19 2018 New Revision: 266473 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266473&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-26 Sandra Loosemore PR

[Bug c/57182] Documentation implies -fprofile-arcs required to create .text.unlikely sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57182 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039 --- Comment #32 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- New patch posted for review here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg4.html

[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039 --- Comment #33 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Dec 4 04:22:37 2018 New Revision: 266770 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266770&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-12-03 Sandra Loosemore PR

[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug sanitizer/56682] -fsanitize documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is -g also recommended for the other -fsanitize= options?

[Bug ada/57659] Failure in installing documentation of gcc-4.7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57659 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37635 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37635&action=edit patch

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm not seeing the warnings (different version of texinfo?), but I think I've tracked down the problem to incorrect sectioning added in r225122: r225122 | rth | 2015-06-29 07:35:19 -070

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Feb 9 03:25:30 2016 New Revision: 233236 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233236&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-08 Sandra Loosemore PR oth

[Bug target/1078] Problems with attributes documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078 --- Comment #15 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sat Apr 16 23:22:52 2016 New Revision: 235066 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235066&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-04-16 Sandra Loosemore PR tar

[Bug target/1078] Problems with attributes documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/16519] -pthread undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16519 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/18206] -dynamic-linker option seems to be badly named, broken and undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18206 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/78829] New: bit-rotten "C99 mode" references in GCC manual

Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- There are quite a few references in the GCC manual to "C99" or "C99 mode" when it really is describing behavior common to C99 and later standards.

[Bug preprocessor/13498] CPP include search path documentation is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/13498] CPP include search path documentation is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sat Jan 7 22:46:13 2017 New Revision: 244201 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244201&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-07 Sandra Loosemore PR preprocess

[Bug preprocessor/54124] GCC 4.7.1 manual: -dM and similar options hard to find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54124 --- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sun Jan 8 01:42:26 2017 New Revision: 244205 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244205&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-07 Sandra Loosemore PR preprocess

[Bug preprocessor/13498] CPP include search path documentation is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug preprocessor/54124] GCC 4.7.1 manual: -dM and similar options hard to find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54124 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug preprocessor/29999] preprocessor documentation is missing from gcc.info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/16519] -pthread undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16519 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Jan 9 02:39:24 2017 New Revision: 244214 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244214&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-08 Sandra Loosemore PR oth

[Bug other/16519] -pthread undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16519 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug middle-end/17660] manual's description of __attribute__((mode)) is poor, arrangement is confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17660 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Jan 9 03:06:23 2017 New Revision: 244215 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244215&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-08 Sandra Loosemore PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/17660] manual's description of __attribute__((mode)) is poor, arrangement is confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17660 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC

[Bug middle-end/32003] Undocumented -fdump-tree options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/79051] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for warnings, line 140)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79051 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/71237] [7 regression] scev tests failing after pass reorganization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/79067] New: gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c runs a million times longer than it used to and times out

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The change committed as part of r238325 made gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c run 100

[Bug libstdc++/79193] New: libstdc++ configure incorrectly decides linking works for cross-compiler

Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I've discovered that libstdc++ is being misconfigured for a bare-metal target that uses newlib. For our toolchai

[Bug libstdc++/79193] libstdc++ configure incorrectly decides linking works for cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from

[Bug libstdc++/79193] libstdc++ configure incorrectly decides linking works for cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40649 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40649&action=edit patch to use "hello, world" to test linking The attached patch is sufficien

[Bug lto/81351] [8 regression] Many LTO testcases FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81351 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >