--- Comment #8 from rus at google dot com 2010-03-21 04:52 ---
Good point. I don't think that setenv should be there in the first place
actually. I'll try to fix that as well.
Just FYI, I'm planning to fix all the reported libstdc++ profile issues around
secon
--- Comment #1 from rus at google dot com 2010-03-28 22:58 ---
Subject: Re: profile-mode version of forward_list
missing
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 3:36 AM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
wrote:
>
>
> --
>
> paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
>
--- Comment #13 from rus at google dot com 2010-04-28 19:06 ---
Subject: Re: ext/profile/all.cc fails on Solaris
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:36 AM, ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #12 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 18:36 ---
> Any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #7 from rus at google dot com 2010-10-03 07:06:26 UTC ---
Hello Paolo,
Thank you for the notification. It's *much* easier to use debug mode as a
template than to start from scratch.
What is the time frame for 4.6.0?
For refe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #8 from rus at google dot com 2010-10-03 07:40:42 UTC ---
Hello Paolo,
Thank you for the notification. It's *much* easier to use debug mode as a
template than to start from scratch.
What is the time frame for 4.6.0?
For refe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46347
--- Comment #1 from rus at google dot com 2010-11-11 23:14:45 UTC ---
The size difference of 100 KB on small tests is actually expected. The vector
instantiation will trigger instantiation of several profile analysis methods.
All these methods
--- Comment #2 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-03 22:46 ---
It's not clear from the description what the problem is here. The profile mode
doesn't instrument either forward_list or slist at this point, so all
inclusions of should fall back to normal mode.
Could you plea
--- Comment #4 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-03 23:12 ---
Oh, OK. I misunderstood. Then let's keep it open to track the addition of new
modules including forward_list.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #14 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-05 03:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=20559)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20559&action=view)
use ext/concurrence __mutex instead of pthread_mutex_t
Could you please try this patch out on your system? It
--- Comment #17 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-06 02:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=20574)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20574&action=view)
Wrote custom algos, removed include algorithm, minor fixes.
This should fix several issues. I still see failin
--- Comment #18 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-06 02:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=20575)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20575&action=view)
Minor fix to previous patch.
Here's a minor fix. It will not affect tests, but just in case you're t
--- Comment #20 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-06 19:43 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Note that in all those patches, the open curly brackets are in the wrong
> place:
> in GCC, C++ runtime included, must *always* follow a newline. Just stylistic
> issues, of cours
--- Comment #23 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-07 17:49 ---
Subject: Re: ext/profile/all.cc fails on Solaris
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:53 PM, kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #22 from kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2010-05
--- Comment #8 from rus at google dot com 2010-06-23 00:29 ---
Subject: Re: profiler_trace.h defines functions __max
and __min which causes portability problems
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 7:10 AM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 f
14 matches
Mail list logo
