--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 10:06
---
Subject: Bug 27073
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Apr 9 10:06:20 2006
New Revision: 112803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112803
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/27073
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 10:09
---
Fixed on mainline and not known to be a regression
for a specific testcase.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 13:53
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27073 ***
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 13:53
---
*** Bug 25595 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 17:43
---
Subject: Bug 27073
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Apr 11 17:43:07 2006
New Revision: 112861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112861
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/27073
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 14:23
---
This issue is related to PR22002. I have a patch.
A slightly-more reduced testcase is:
struct node { struct node *next; int value; };
struct node *current_node, global_list;
void
bar (void)
{
struct node
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 21:34
---
Subject: Bug 26725
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Apr 25 21:34:48 2006
New Revision: 113257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113257
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/26725
*
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 21:36
---
Patch applied to trunk.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-27 16:41
---
Subject: Bug 25514
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Apr 27 16:41:51 2006
New Revision: 113312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113312
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/25514
* c
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-27 16:43
---
Subject: Bug 25514
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Apr 27 16:43:10 2006
New Revision: 113313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113313
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/25514
* c
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 22:36
---
The patch looks good to me, thanks, and should be small enough to
avoid the need for a copyright assignment. I'll apply it next week.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 12:57
---
Subject: Bug 25871
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue May 2 12:57:52 2006
New Revision: 113460
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113460
Log:
2006-05-02 Joshua Kinard <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 13:02
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 08:05
---
Subject: Bug 22209
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri May 19 08:05:39 2006
New Revision: 113903
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113903
Log:
* libgcc2.c (MIN_UNITS_PER_WORD): Move
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 15:10
---
The use of $f14 was an unintentional historical accident,
not a deliberate decision. It has since been "fixed".
I realise this isn't going to be very helpful to you,
but you should just treat
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 15:13
---
Any update on this?
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: mipsisa64-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 15:24
---
This was fixed for 4.2 by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00806.html
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 14:16
---
Subject: Bug 25891
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat May 20 14:15:51 2006
New Revision: 113929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113929
Log:
gcc/testsuite
PR testsuite/25891
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 14:19
---
Fixed by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01023.html
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-22 15:58
---
Subject: Bug 25514
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon May 22 15:58:03 2006
New Revision: 113983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113983
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/25514
* c
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 06:17
---
Created an attachment (id=11498)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11498&action=view)
Possible patch
I'm very sorry for the breakage. Here's a patch that appears
to fix the bu
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 13:06
---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01169.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27736
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 15:07
---
Subject: Bug 27736
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue May 23 15:07:00 2006
New Revision: 114019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114019
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/27736
* c
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 15:08
---
Patch applied. (Thanks to Roger for the quick review.)
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #31 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:46
---
FYI, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01010.html
about the MIPS16 situation. To summarise, mips16.S should be considered
legacy code, and I've never seen a report of it being used (never
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-06 08:54
---
Based on David's descripion, a reduced testcase appears to be:
static short f[100];
int
bar (void)
{
return f[0];
}
void
foo (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
f[i]++;
}
Looking at the
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 12:57
---
In response to comment #1, "tmp" isn't really the problem.
The problem is coverage_counter_alloc(), which initially
create an array of 1000 counters, and only supplies the
real type at the end
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 14:31
---
Created an attachment (id=11704)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11704&action=view)
Candidate patch
Janis, can you try this patch? It avoids the use of section anchors
for coverage c
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 21:27
---
Subject: Bug 28034
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jun 21 21:27:19 2006
New Revision: 114870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114870
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/28034
* co
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 21:28
---
Patch applied.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: sh
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 08:16
---
I'm testing a patch.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
rgument pop after
doubleword shift
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rs
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 08:21
---
I'm testing a patch.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 15:29
---
Subject: Bug 28402
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jul 17 15:29:19 2006
New Revision: 115524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115524
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/28402
*
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 15:31
---
Subject: Bug 28403
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jul 17 15:31:12 2006
New Revision: 115525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115525
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/28403
*
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 15:34
---
Patch committed to mainline. Will commit to branches in a few
days if nothing goes awry.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 15:34
---
Patch committed to mainline. Will commit to branches in a few
days if nothing goes awry.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-11 23:27
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-11 23:24
---
Subject: Bug 37363
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Nov 11 23:23:23 2008
New Revision: 141774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141774
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/37363
*
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-15 20:42
---
I'll try to look at this tomorrow. The code in comment #1 is certainly wrong:
the store at is supposed come after the GP addiu
at . With that fixed, the function should work
as expected.
I'm guessing
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 20:27
---
Subject: Bug 38052
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Nov 16 20:25:40 2008
New Revision: 141925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141925
Log:
gcc/
PR target/38052
* config/mip
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 20:32
---
Subject: Bug 38052
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Nov 16 20:31:13 2008
New Revision: 141926
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141926
Log:
gcc/
PR target/38052
* config/mip
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 21:08
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-15 21:40
---
I think this was fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg01996.html
Could you check whether it works for you?
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-20 21:35
---
OK well, thanks for trying. I'm glad you have a workaround,
even if it's not the one I thought. (Perhaps it was another
TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION combine.c fix. ISTR there were a few.)
Anyway, the proble
gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-21 13:48
---
I have a patch, but it isn't appropriate at this stage in the 4.4 cycle.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38598
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-21 14:00
---
I have a patch, but it isn't appropriate at this stage in the 4.4 cycle.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
ned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: mipsisa64-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38599
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-21 14:06
---
I have a patch, but it isn't appropriate at this stage in the 4.4 cycle.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-21 21:46
---
Subject: Bug 35899
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Dec 21 21:45:11 2008
New Revision: 142874
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142874
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR targ
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-21 21:46
---
Subject: Bug 38598
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Dec 21 21:44:39 2008
New Revision: 142873
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142873
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR targ
on level
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 21:58
---
Subject: Bug 38426
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jan 6 21:58:46 2009
New Revision: 143135
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143135
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/38426.
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 22:02
---
Fixed on mainline. Dmitry, sorry for the duplicate work.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 19:23
---
OK, I'm going to need some help debugging this one. First of all,
how are you running your tests? E.g.
(a) are you using --target_board unix/-m64,
(b) is -m64 the default, or
(c) something else?
S
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 19:12
---
Do you only see this for libjava?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40699
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 40699
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Jul 11 06:10:49 2009
New Revision: 149508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149508
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR testsuite/40699
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 40707
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Jul 11 06:10:49 2009
New Revision: 149508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149508
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR testsuite/40699
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 40709
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Jul 11 06:10:49 2009
New Revision: 149508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149508
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR testsuite/40699
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:31
---
Reverted the offending commit.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:32
---
Reverted the offending commit.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:44
---
"ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de" writes:
> Unfortunately, the same thing happens when I invoke runtest manually in the
> 20090522 tree where the 64-bit tests still worked correctly.
A
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 09:22
---
I think TImode has to be a workable mode for IRIX 6. Long double is TFmode,
and it would certainly seem odd to support TImode and not TFmode. (I seem to
remember the s390 folks having to add TImode support
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 16:09
---
Confirmed. Here's a dejagnu-style testcase:
// PR c++/20416. We correctly constructed the temporary S in foo(),
// but incorrectly destroyed it every time foo() was called.
// { dg-do run }
extern &qu
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 16:09
---
BTW, this is 12.2/5.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20416
+
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24977
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 10:19
---
Testing a fix
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 07:45
---
Subject: Bug 25805
Author: rsandifo
Revision: 109947
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Jan 19 07:45:28 2006
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 07:46
---
Subject: Bug 25805
Author: rsandifo
Revision: 109946
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Jan 19 07:46:15 2006
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 07:48
---
I've checked in the fix for 4.1 and 4.2. It doesn't apply directly
to earlier branches because they used TREE_LISTs for CONSTRUCTORs.
A straight-forward conversion would introduce a linear walk ove
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 08:32
---
Subject: Bug 28403
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Jul 20 08:31:59 2006
New Revision: 115611
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115611
Log:
Backport from mainline:
20
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 08:35
---
Subject: Bug 28402
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Jul 20 08:34:53 2006
New Revision: 115613
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115613
Log:
Backport from mainline:
20
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 13:30
---
Subject: Bug 28402
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jul 26 13:30:34 2006
New Revision: 115755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115755
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/28402
*
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 13:32
---
Subject: Bug 28403
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jul 26 13:32:01 2006
New Revision: 115756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115756
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/28403
*
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 13:34
---
Subject: Bug 28402
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jul 26 13:34:17 2006
New Revision: 115757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115757
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/28402
*
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 13:35
---
Subject: Bug 28403
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jul 26 13:35:34 2006
New Revision: 115758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115758
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/28403
*
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 13:38
---
Patch applied to branches.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 13:39
---
Patch applied to branches
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-30 10:56
---
Subject: Bug 28126
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Jul 30 10:56:07 2006
New Revision: 115819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115819
Log:
gcc/
2006-07-25 Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 21:06
---
Created an attachment (id=12010)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12010&action=view)
A hackish fix
I agree with Kaz that a blockage would be a correct fix here.
I'm just worri
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-13 08:34
---
Re comment #1: it's a generic bug in reorg.c (fill_slots_from_thread).
I'm testing a patch.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-14 11:56
---
Subject: Bug 28634
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Aug 14 12:55:52 2006
New Revision: 116124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116124
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/28634
*
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-14 11:58
---
Patch applied to mainline. It has been approved for 4.1,
so I'll apply it there after testing.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
: wrong-code, ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: arm-none-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28982
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 08:37
---
Created an attachment (id=12211)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12211&action=view)
Testcase
This brute-force test fails with -O2 -mfloat-abi=softfp.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 10:56
---
Subject: Bug 28634
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Sep 9 10:56:31 2006
New Revision: 116796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116796
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/28634
*
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 11:01
---
Applied to 4.1 after testing on mipsisa64-elf and mips64-linux-gnu.
Although the bug has been around for a long time, it isn't known to
be a regression from 4.0 to some earlier release, so it doesn't
qua
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 07:13
---
Subject: Bug 27681
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Sep 10 07:13:12 2006
New Revision: 116811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116811
Log:
gcc/
PR target/27681
Backp
--- Comment #15 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 07:13
---
Subject: Bug 22209
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Sep 10 07:13:12 2006
New Revision: 116811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116811
Log:
gcc/
PR target/27681
Backp
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 07:17
---
Patch committed.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ity: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: mipsisa64-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29006
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 19:08
---
I'm about to commit a fix.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 19:28
---
Subject: Bug 29006
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Sep 10 19:28:48 2006
New Revision: 116822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116822
Log:
gcc/
PR target/29006
* config/m
1 - 100 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
