[Bug c/32793] New: [4.3 regression] ICE dwarf2out

2007-07-17 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rosana07a at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i696 GCC host triplet: i686 GCC target triplet: i686 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32793

[Bug c/32793] [4.3 regression] ICE dwarf2out

2007-07-17 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 12:09 --- Created an attachment (id=13932) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13932&action=view) prerocessed from gcc.c-torture/execute -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32793

[Bug tree-optimization/32720] [4.3 Regression] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-18 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-19 03:02 --- Created an attachment (id=13937) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13937&action=view) combined testcase; obsoletes all previous with -"O2 -c" will fail using gcc-4.3 and compi

[Bug tree-optimization/32746] [4.3 Regression] tree-ssa-operands int.comp error

2007-07-22 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-22 20:09 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] tree-ssa-operands int.comp error > > I already submitted a patch for this (see my followup to HP that fixes > valid_gimple_expression_p). > A

[Bug tree-optimization/32720] [4.3 Regression] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-27 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-27 19:56 --- Thanks gfortran team! -- rosana07a at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug tree-optimization/32720] [4.3 Regression] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-27 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-27 23:33 --- My problem is solved; the rest is beyond me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720

[Bug tree-optimization/32720] [4.3 Regression] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-27 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-27 23:36 --- My problem is solved; the rest is beyond me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720

[Bug c/32923] New: [4.3.0 Regression] too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-27 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rosana07a at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686 GCC host triplet: i686 GCC target triplet: i686 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32923

[Bug c/32923] [4.3.0 Regression] too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-27 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-28 02:37 --- Created an attachment (id=13990) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13990&action=view) preprocessed *.i file per gcc-4.2.1 is identical to per 4.3.0 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug c/32923] [4.3.0 Regression] too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-27 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-28 02:39 --- Created an attachment (id=13991) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13991&action=view) *.s file failing -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32923

[Bug c/32923] [4.3.0 Regression] too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-27 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-28 02:39 --- Created an attachment (id=13992) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13992&action=view) *.s OK -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32923

[Bug other/32923] [4.3 Regression] too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-28 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-28 22:10 --- As a mathematician and logician the handling os this PR and my previous PR32720 make no sense. A fellow worker told me about fortan 90/95 under gcc-4.3. the only thing in common with both PR's was a change from gc

[Bug other/32923] [4.3 Regression] too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-28 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-29 00:43 --- > And it will be done if you indicate that you don't intend to do it, but as you > found it, it's more natural that you report it (if only, to be kept informed . > Not my problem as I clearly can u

[Bug fortran/32720] New: No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-10 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rosana07a at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686 GCC host triplet: i686 GCC target triplet: i686 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720

[Bug fortran/32720] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-10 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-10 16:07 --- Created an attachment (id=13877) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13877&action=view) failing *.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720

[Bug fortran/32720] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-10 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-10 16:08 --- Created an attachment (id=13878) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13878&action=view) 1st req *.mod -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720

[Bug fortran/32720] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-10 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-10 16:09 --- Created an attachment (id=13879) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13879&action=view) 2nd req *.mod -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720

[Bug fortran/32720] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-10 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-10 16:10 --- Created an attachment (id=13880) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13880&action=view) 3rd req *.mod -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720

[Bug fortran/32720] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-10 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-10 16:11 --- Created an attachment (id=13881) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13881&action=view) 4th req *.mod -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720

[Bug fortran/32720] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-10 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-10 16:14 --- Works with -O0 Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.3.0/configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --disable-nls --disable-multilib --disable-werror

[Bug tree-optimization/32720] No coalesce ssa_names

2007-07-11 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-11 17:32 --- Works with 4.2.1 ' making this a regression Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.2.1/configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --host=i686-pc-

[Bug c++/32746] New: tree-ssa-operands int.comp error

2007-07-12 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
Summary: tree-ssa-operands int.comp error Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rosana07a at gmail

[Bug tree-optimization/32746] tree-ssa-operands int.comp error

2007-07-12 Thread rosana07a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from rosana07a at gmail dot com 2007-07-12 22:30 --- Created an attachment (id=13905) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13905&action=view) pr24665.ii -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32746