--- Comment #1 from rob dot quill at gmail dot com 2007-11-16 15:03 ---
Hey,
I can confirm this and am trying to investigate the problem. It seems that
more_specialized_fn() loops over the arguments to the first overloaded
function, where in this case there are two, but the tree chain
--- Comment #6 from rob dot quill at gmail dot com 2007-11-16 20:00 ---
I'm working on adding a new pass for this.
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33092
--- Comment #7 from rob dot quill at gmail dot com 2007-11-17 19:27 ---
I believe I have this done, just checking there are no regressions.
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33092
--- Comment #8 from rob dot quill at gmail dot com 2007-11-19 13:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=14581)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14581&action=view)
Patch adds a dummy pass, as discussed in comments
Patch attached, no regressions on x86_64.
--
