Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
It appears that the default op== for a C-array has array-to-pointer decay
applied and does not compare the underlying array data
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
std::fill_n is constexpr in C++20 but when writing unsigned chars it delegates
to __builtin_memset which is not constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94933
--- Comment #2 from rhalbersma ---
Sorry, my bad, but that particular overload of __fill_a1 calls
__builtin_memset. I was under the impression that this was the reason for the
missing constexpr. It would be great if simply adding _GLIBCXX20_CONST
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
--- Comment #1 from rhalbersma ---
I just became aware of [depr.array.comp] in N4861
"Equality and relational comparisons (7.6.10, 7.6.9) between two operands of
array type are deprecated."
This is very surprising to say the least and disqualif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
--- Comment #2 from rhalbersma ---
OK, Alisdair Meredith points out on Twitter that in [class.compare.default]/6
there is a special sentence on array class data members
In that list, any subobject of array type is recursively expanded to the
seq
ority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Combining the std::ranges::xxx_view adaptors with the pipeline operator does
not compile, in contrast to the supposedly expression equivalen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95100
--- Comment #2 from rhalbersma ---
OK, so the rewriting rules [range.adaptors]/4, that make views::xxx(R)
equivalent to R | views::xxx, do not allow to rewrite the expression equivalent
xxx_view{R} as R | xxx_view? That would be rather finicky, p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54903
Bug #: 54903
Summary: Auto + static in-class constant initalization not
working
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following code comes from this StackOverflow Q&A (note this is not related
to std::bitset, it's just a homegr
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Neither libstdc++ 5.1.0 nor the trunk version implement LWG defect reports 2275
and 2301 that make std::tuple
-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following code segfaults with -std=c++1y for g++ 5.1.0 and trunk 20150502
on the combination of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
--- Comment #1 from rhalbersma ---
See also LWG active issue 2234
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2234
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
g++ 5.1.0 and current trunk 20150505 won't compile the following code with
-std=c++1y:
constexpr auto fun(int n)
{
switch(n) {
c
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following program fails to compile for g++ 4.9.0 and further
#include
int main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66059
--- Comment #2 from rhalbersma ---
Apparently VC and Clang have compiler hooks for this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/3t0nrc/true_story_efficient_packing_tales_of_c/cx26s02
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Item 12 of Effective Modern C++ contains this example:
class Base {
public:
virtual void mf1() const;
virtual void mf2(int x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65978
--- Comment #3 from rhalbersma ---
Ping to get this merged into the upcoming 5.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65977
--- Comment #4 from rhalbersma ---
Ping to get this merged into the upcoming 5.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65985
rhalbersma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #10 from rhalbersma ---
Ping to get this merged into the upcoming 5.4 release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66059
--- Comment #14 from rhalbersma ---
Ping to get this merged into the upcoming 5.4 release.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
#include
#include
int main() {
using T = std::bitset<1>;
T a(1);
T b;
std::stringstream sstr;
sstr << a;
sstr >> b;
}
The above progr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
--- Comment #4 from rhalbersma ---
Is there any chance that this bug fix can be backported to gcc 10 also?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93480
--- Comment #9 from rhalbersma ---
Could this fix also be back-ported to gcc 10?
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I'm a happy user of std::views::zip in gcc-latest but AFAICS the feature test
macro __cpp_lib_ranges_z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113807
--- Comment #3 from rhalbersma ---
Nice that this is changed now. I noticed a similar optimization could be done
for bitset::operator== (more accurately: the helper _M_is_equal) where there is
an opportunity to use memcmp, with a similar dance f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113807
--- Comment #8 from rhalbersma ---
For bitset::operator==, I wonder why (at last in C++20 and later mode) it is
not defaulted?
For bitset::set and bitset::operator==, I also wonder why the manual loop vs
memset/memcmp consteval logic is not de
verity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
It seems that since time immemorial, bitset::operator>>= unnecessarily
sanitizes the high word by
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rhalbersma at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Conditionally on is_constant_evaluated() being false, bitset::reset delegate to
__builtin_memset(_M_w, 0, _Nw * sizeof(_WordT)) and uses a loop otherwise. In
29 matches
Mail list logo
