[Bug bootstrap/52947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails due to wrong include search path composition

2012-05-13 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947 --- Comment #4 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2012-05-13 15:15:10 UTC --- Adding --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx \ --disable-build-with-cxx \ allows the full bootstrap on windows with mingw64. Something is broken with C++ though as

[Bug bootstrap/52947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails due to wrong include search path composition

2012-04-21 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
||com --- Comment #3 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2012-04-21 09:39:19 UTC --- Just chiming in. Im also running into this problem in stage2 where it fails to find stdarg.h. As an experiment i tried reverting kai's work but it still fails to find s

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

2016-03-19 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #20 from ralphengels at gmail dot com --- Clarification. If not using pthreads-w32 #ifdef PTW32_VERSION // See libstdc++/67114 # define _GLIBCXX_THREAD_ID_LESS(X, Y) ((X).x < (Y).x) <- this #endif would end up undefined if

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

2016-03-19 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 ralphengels at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38009|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

2016-03-19 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #22 from ralphengels at gmail dot com --- Aye the pthreads specific fixes needs to be taken care of upstream. The comment was just to let people know that the gcc changes are not enough. Ill try and get a hold on the current

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

2016-03-19 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 ralphengels at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ralphengels at gmail dot

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

2016-03-19 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #19 from ralphengels at gmail dot com --- Had problems with the define not being pulled in from os_defines.h (i think a better place would have been gthr_posix.h since that gets pulled in at build time) hence the change, also if

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

2016-03-19 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #13 from ralphengels at gmail dot com --- Also needs a small change in pthread.h to guard against including windows.h #if defined(PTW32_CONFIG_MINGW) && defined(__cplusplus) change to #if defined(PTW32_CONFIG_MINGW) &a

[Bug c++/71298] New: changes to libstdc++ breaks windows builds

2016-05-26 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ralphengels at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- gcc-6.1.0 libstdc++ cannot find stdlib.h on mingw-w64. the change seems to have been cstdlib where the include was changed to include_next.

[Bug libstdc++/71298] changes to libstdc++ breaks windows builds

2016-06-06 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71298 --- Comment #3 from ralphengels at gmail dot com --- Sorry for the delay, yes its a duplicate of the same bug you linked to. The msys2 devs have found a way to get around it which does not include patching, but i thought it best to report it

[Bug preprocessor/48677] New: cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-18 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 Summary: cpp.exe broken ? Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-19 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #2 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-19 09:41:45 UTC --- in all cases im afraid. i tried skipping over null names but the crash persists, no output either i just get the usual windows box with cpp.exe has stopped working

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-20 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #3 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-20 08:48:38 UTC --- Created attachment 24055 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24055 screenshot of gdb output screenshot of gdb's output. hope it helps.

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-20 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #5 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-20 09:30:51 UTC --- sorry about that its just i have no idea how to copy the text from gdb's console window. about checking if name = null im not sure how i should go abo

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-20 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #8 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-20 10:00:24 UTC --- my bad i ran cpp.exe by pulling it directly into gdb (had to use a command prompt). heres the output. -0x417f90:mov0x4(%esp),%eax -0x417f94

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-20 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #9 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-20 15:17:40 UTC --- if its any help i noticed that cpp.exe seems to have a dependency on libstdc++6.dll "somewhere" since dependency walker says it doesnt but it barfs pretty lou

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-20 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #10 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-20 22:48:54 UTC --- hmm it seems im getting closer to iron out where the bug appears. 3880#if defined(TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT_RELOCATABLE) && !defined(VMS) 3881 /

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-21 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #11 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-21 15:45:13 UTC --- ok it seems to be related to sysroots i tried compiling without --with-sysroot and cpp.exe works then. question would then be if its an error on my part ? i use

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-04-21 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #12 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-04-21 16:18:17 UTC --- ok it works ! but damn this is strange i had to encase the path to the sysroot directory in quotes and use the windows path instead of the posix path variant. ../src

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-05-14 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #13 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-05-15 01:37:13 UTC --- took me quite a while but i found the bug. in gcc/cppspec.c /* If we don't need to edit the command line, we can bail early. */ new_argc = argc + n

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-05-15 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
||FIXED --- Comment #14 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-05-15 11:20:25 UTC --- well cpp seems to work now so im changing it to fixed unless someone disagress ?.

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

2011-05-15 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com
|FIXED | --- Comment #16 from ralphengels at gmail dot com 2011-05-15 12:29:29 UTC --- ok ill leave it open. still one bug im running in to but not sure its related to this one. the 64 bit build of 4.6.0 cannot bootstrap itself collect2 ld error 116. the 32 bit one works

[Bug target/83562] broken destructors of thread_local objects on i686 mingw targets

2020-10-02 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83562 ralphengels at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ralphengels at gmail dot

[Bug libstdc++/106908] New: libsupc++ wrong declaration of __unexpected_handler

2022-09-12 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ralphengels at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- the declaration of __unexpected_handler in unwind-cxx.h is wrongly declared as extern std::terminate_handler __unexpected_handler; should be extern std

[Bug libstdc++/106908] libsupc++ wrong declaration of __unexpected_handler

2022-09-12 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106908 --- Comment #2 from ralphengels at gmail dot com --- ah my bad then i just thought it looked suspicious especially since i been having problems building gnat. For some reason it tries to link to the static libgcc library and aborts due to an

[Bug ada/100486] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows

2021-07-05 Thread ralphengels at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486 ralphengels at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ralphengels at gmail dot