[Bug rtl-optimization/30113] ICE in trunc_int_for_mode

2006-12-11 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-11 21:29 --- Subject: Bug 30113 Author: rakdver Date: Mon Dec 11 21:29:44 2006 New Revision: 119748 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119748 Log: PR rtl-optimization/30113 * l

[Bug middle-end/30322] ((-i-1) + i) +1) is turned into ~i + (i+1) and never into 0 on the tree level

2007-01-09 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug middle-end/30322] ((-i-1) + i) +1) is turned into ~i + (i+1) and never into 0 on the tree level

2007-01-09 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 15:30 --- (In reply to comment #6) > It seems to be IVOPTs rewriting introduces the trees. Testcase: Which happens because fold causes the number of iterations of the loop to be something like e + ~f, and then is not a

[Bug tree-optimization/29516] gfortran miscompiled

2007-01-09 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 --- (In reply to comment #14) > (which gcc version are the dumps created with?) > > First IVOPTs should not create pointer multiplication. Really. Second, the > problem is prob

[Bug tree-optimization/29516] gfortran miscompiled

2007-01-09 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 00:04 --- Created an attachment (id=12875) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12875&action=view) A patch I am testing the attached patch. It would be great if someone could test it on i386-apple

[Bug middle-end/30322] ((-i-1) + i) +1) is turned into ~i + (i+1) and never into 0 on the tree level

2007-01-09 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 00:44 --- Subject: Bug 30322 Author: rakdver Date: Wed Jan 10 00:44:26 2007 New Revision: 120630 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120630 Log: PR tree-optimization/30322 * tree-

[Bug tree-optimization/29516] gfortran miscompiled

2007-01-09 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 00:55 --- Created an attachment (id=12876) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12876&action=view) A fixed patch. Not quite, I forgot to rewrite several occurences of addr to addr_off in the function

[Bug tree-optimization/29516] gfortran miscompiled

2007-01-11 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #31 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 09:02 --- Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00970.html -- rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/29516] gfortran miscompiled

2007-01-11 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #32 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-12 00:18 --- Subject: Bug 29516 Author: rakdver Date: Fri Jan 12 00:17:50 2007 New Revision: 120695 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120695 Log: PR tree-optimization/29516 *

[Bug tree-optimization/29516] gfortran miscompiled

2007-01-23 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #36 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 21:19 --- Patch for 4.2: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01941.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29516

<    2   3   4   5   6   7