[Bug libobjc/93099] New: Multiple definition error while linking libobjc.dll.a

2019-12-30 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Component: libobjc Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- libtool: link: /opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.F6n0FMZOiy/gcc-10.0.0/gcc-10.0.0/./gcc/xgcc -B/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.F6n0FMZOiy/gcc-10.0.0/gcc-10.0.0/./gcc/ -L/opt/devel

[Bug libobjc/93099] Multiple definition error while linking libobjc.dll.a

2019-12-30 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93099 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich --- That's with revision 279747.

[Bug libobjc/93099] [10 Regression] Multiple definition error while linking libobjc.dll.a

2020-01-01 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93099 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Created attachment 47566 [details] > Patch to try > > Can you try this patch? > It should fix the problem but I cannot test it as I don't have a windows > build

[Bug libobjc/93099] [10 Regression] Multiple definition error while linking libobjc.dll.a

2020-01-01 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93099 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Created attachment 47566 [details] > Patch to try > > Can you try this patch? > It should fix the problem but I cannot test it as I don't have a windows > build

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

2013-02-06 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Emrich 2013-02-06 17:20:53 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 06.02.2013 18:04, schrieb daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 > >

[Bug ada/56316] New: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap with ada on mingw fails in ada/gcc-interface/trans.c

2013-02-14 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Host: *-w64-mingw32 Target: *-w64-mingw32 Build: *-w64-mingw32

[Bug ada/56316] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap with ada on mingw fails in ada/gcc-interface/trans.c

2013-02-14 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56316 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich 2013-02-14 08:52:19 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 14.02.2013 09:46, schrieb charlet at gcc dot gnu.org: > I would suggest always checking with current trunk before opening the

[Bug ada/56410] New: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap with ada on x86_64-w64-mingw32 fails in gnattools, new dependency on gmp.h

2013-02-20 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32 Target

[Bug ada/56410] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap with ada on x86_64-w64-mingw32 fails in gnattools, new dependency on gmp.h

2013-02-20 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56410 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/56424] New: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails in libada, gnat1 asserts in declare_return_variable, at tree-inline.c:2833

2013-02-22 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de CC: hubi...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/56424] [4.8 Regression] ICE at tree-inline.c:2833 on a-nllcef.ads at -O2

2013-02-24 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56424 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich 2013-02-24 19:41:51 UTC --- Am 24.02.2013 17:05, schrieb ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org: > --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2013-02-24 > 16:05:44 UTC --- Confirmed, but libada isn't stage #3 since it's a t

[Bug bootstrap/53912] New: bootstrap fails at stage 2 with error: cast from 'void*' to 'long int' loses precision in ggc-common.c

2012-07-10 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
c Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de bootstrap native x86_64-w64-mingw32 fails at stage 2: /SCRATCH/tmp.

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails at stage 2 with error: cast from 'void*' to 'long int' loses precision in ggc-common.c

2012-07-11 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-11 14:07:17 UTC --- Created attachment 27776 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27776 preprocessed source I assume for trunk there is the same issue, because ggc-common.c hasn't changed

[Bug bootstrap/53980] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails in stage 1: i386.md:17784:3: error: 'OPTION_BIONIC' undeclared here (not in a function) in build/gencondmd.c

2012-07-16 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
sification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Bootstrap fails in s

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails at stage 2 with error: cast from 'void*' to 'long int' loses precision in ggc-common.c

2012-07-16 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 Regression] bootstrap |[4.7/4.8 Regression] |f

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails at stage 2 with error: cast from 'void*' to 'long int' loses precision in ggc-common.c

2012-07-16 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-16 17:17:24 UTC --- Created attachment 27804 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27804 Errors in stage 2 These are the errors I get in stage 2 for gcc-4.8.0. How to proceed?

[Bug ada/54028] New: [4.8 Regression] libada build failure when bootstrapping x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de build of libada fails in gcc/ada/rts: /SCRATCH/tmp.xipisatGtI/gcc-4.8.0/gcc-4.8.0/./gcc/xgcc -B/SCRATCH/tmp.xipisatGtI/gcc

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7/4.8 Regression] |b

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-19 20:33:01 UTC --- Am 19.07.2012 18:12, schrieb redi at gcc dot gnu.org: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 > > --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-19 > 16:12:18 UTC --- > Doe

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-19 22:31:32 UTC --- ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/print-tree.c:258:31: error: cast from 'tree' to 'long unsigned int' loses precision [-fpermissive] hash = ((unsigned long) node) % HASH_SIZE; Same he

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-19 22:41:28 UTC --- ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/tree-dump.c:171:63: error: cast from 'void*' to 'long unsigned int' loses precision [-fpermissive] fprintf (di->stream, "%-4s: %-8lx ", field, (unsigned l

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-19 23:17:40 UTC --- ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/prefix.c: In function 'char* lookup_key(char*)': ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/prefix.c:160:22: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'char*' [-fpermissive

[Bug ada/54028] [4.8 Regression] libada build failure when bootstrapping x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-20 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54028 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-20 10:23:32 UTC --- Am 20.07.2012 09:23, schrieb gingold at gcc dot gnu.org: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54028 > > ging...@gcc.gnu.org changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug ada/54028] [4.8 Regression] libada build failure when bootstrapping x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-20 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54028 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-20 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-20 15:30:09 UTC --- Created attachment 27846 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27846 proposed patch This fixes the C and C++ part.

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-20 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #17 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-20 16:18:00 UTC --- I'm travelling for 2 weeks from now on. During this time I have no opportunity to work any further on this issue. Kai, perhaps you may help out?

[Bug plugins/52872] New: --enable-plugin; incorrrect test for "exported symbols" and "-rdynamic" in gcc/configure.ac

2012-04-04 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: plugins AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de On systems with non empty $exeext the configure tests are failing with: checking

[Bug plugins/52872] --enable-plugin; incorrrect test for "exported symbols" and "-rdynamic" in gcc/configure.ac

2012-04-04 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52872 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich 2012-04-04 17:22:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > It really won't change that much as -rdynamic and exported symbols are not > supported on windows right now anyways. Agreed, but I think it's pretty easy to

[Bug bootstrap/52947] New: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails due to wrong include search path composition

2012-04-12 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de native x86_64-w64-mingw32 bootstrap using --with-sysroot This used to work for the 4.6 series. ../../src/gcc-4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/52947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails due to wrong include search path composition

2012-04-12 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich 2012-04-12 15:36:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I remember Kai did surgery in this place. Did you identify a patch that > caused > this regression? My bet would be > > 2011-03-25 Kai Tietz > >

[Bug c++/57897] Target x86_64-w64-mingw32 failed with '-mno-fentry isn't compatible with SEH'

2013-12-13 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Emrich --- Am 12.12.2013 23:08, schrieb ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897 > > --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz --- By following > patch for me the issue is solved: > > Index:

[Bug target/88331] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_layout, at cfgrtl.c:2987

2019-01-03 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88331 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de --- Comment

[Bug target/88331] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_layout, at cfgrtl.c:2987

2019-01-03 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88331 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Emrich --- If I call make within the libgfortran directory I get a slightly different error message: during RTL pass: postreload ../../../../../../../../opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-9.0.0/libgfortran/generated/m

[Bug target/88331] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_layout, at cfgrtl.c:2987

2019-01-03 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88331 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 45323 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45323&action=edit preprocessed source I attached the preprocessed source.

[Bug testsuite/82006] [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2017-12-09 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #7) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Yeah, I have no exact analysis yet, but the issue is caused by Richards > commit r251220. I wonder how this can caus

[Bug testsuite/82006] [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2017-12-09 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Emrich --- Additional info, if I disable the currently on x86_64-w64-mingw32 broken lto explicitly with --disable-lto, the issue vanishes.

[Bug testsuite/82006] [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2017-12-11 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > Hmm, builtins.exp references $LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS. Does the issue only > reproduce with builtins.exp or also other .exp files? As you see in comment 8 there a

[Bug testsuite/82006] [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2017-12-14 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 --- Comment #13 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #12) > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 > > > > ---

[Bug ada/84277] New: [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

2018-02-08 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- I get a lot of new acats testsuite failures compared to 7.3.0, see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-02/msg00439.html and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

[Bug ada/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

2018-02-08 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 43374 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43374&action=edit acats testsuite log for 8.0.0 with -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition Testsuite log for 8.0.0 with -fno-reorder-

[Bug ada/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

2018-02-08 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 43375 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43375&action=edit acats testsuite log for 7.3.1 Testsuite log for 7.3.1

[Bug testsuite/82006] [8/9 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2019-04-11 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/90368] New: gdc testsuite uses "ln -s . gdc.test", which doesn't work on msys2

2019-05-06 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
everity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- The gdc testsuite uses "ln -s . gdc.test" to link gec.test in the testsuite/gdc directory. This doesn&

[Bug c++/70401] [c++1z on mingw]compile variadic template failed

2018-02-15 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70401 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich --- gcc-7.3.0 on x86_64-w64-mingw32 doesn't compile this code: $ g++ -std=c++1z aa.cpp -o aa.exe aa.cpp: In instantiation of 'std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const std::tuple<_Tps ...>&) [with T = {long

[Bug c++/70401] [c++1z on mingw]compile variadic template failed

2018-02-15 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70401 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich --- For a recent trunk version 8.0.1 20180207 (experimental) [trunk revision 257437] it's the same.

[Bug ada/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

2018-02-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Emrich --- Update on the gnat testsuite: === gnat tests === Schedule of variations: unix Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. Usin

[Bug target/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

2018-03-08 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 --- Comment #15 from Rainer Emrich --- Hi Eric, thanks for all your work. Unfortunately your changes introduced an ICE while building binutils 2.19.1: make[4]: Entering directory '/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.5VoInHZZvv/gcc-8.0.0/binutils-2.29.1/opc

[Bug target/84763] New: [8 Regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_cold_init

2018-03-08 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 43600 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43600&action=edit preprocessed source Building binutils 2.29.1 there'

[Bug target/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

2018-03-08 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 --- Comment #17 from Rainer Emrich --- Otherwise this looks good: === acats Summary === # of expected passes2315 # of unexpected failures5 *** FAILURES: c23003b c23003g c23003i c250002 c380004 That's on par w

[Bug target/84763] [8 regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_cold_init

2018-03-09 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84763 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich --- binutils 2.19.1 is building fine now. Bootstrap and complete testsuite run of r258381 in progress. I will send the results to the gcc-testresults mailing list.

[Bug bootstrap/85020] New: [8 Regression] gcc fails to bootstrap with profiledbootstrap and --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2018-03-21 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- make profiledbootstrap fails for configuration with bootstrap-lto in

[Bug d/87799] New: failure during bootstrap, fails to build d/filename.o

2018-10-29 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Component: d Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- /opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.I8jwTRKpzz/gcc-9.0.0-test/gcc-9.0.0-test/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.I8jwTRKpzz/gcc-9.0.0-test/gcc-9.0.0-test/./prev-gcc/ -B/opt/devel

[Bug d/87819] New: failure during bootstrap, fails to build libdruntime

2018-10-30 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- There are a lot undefined identifier errors while compiling core/demangle.d: /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=D --mode=compile /opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.I8jwTRKpzz/gcc-9.0.0-test

[Bug ada/55704] New: [4.7 Regression] Failures building ada

2012-12-15 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Since the transition to g++ for stage2 and stage3, ada fails to build in stage2. There are several failures of the type "error: invalid conversion":

[Bug ada/55704] [4.7 Regression] Failures building ada

2012-12-15 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55704 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich 2012-12-15 10:14:47 UTC --- The same for 4.8.0 in stage 1: g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-for

[Bug libfortran/55705] New: [4.7 Regression] error: 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared in libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c

2012-12-15 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile /SCRATCH/tmp.wOrMZOydvQ

[Bug bootstrap/55706] New: [4.8 Regression] failue to build libstdc++ in stage 1

2012-12-15 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Created attachment 28976 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28976 error log There are a lot of failures, huge error

[Bug bootstrap/55707] New: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails in gcc/graphite-dependences.c error cast loses precision

2012-12-15 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Issue on LLP64 systems. Simple proposed patch: Index: graphite-dependences.c

[Bug libfortran/55705] [4.7 Regression] error: 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared in libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c

2012-12-16 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55705 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich 2012-12-16 11:22:28 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 15.12.2012 16:08, schrieb rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55705 > > Richard

[Bug libfortran/55705] [4.7 Regression] error: 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared in libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c

2012-12-16 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55705 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

2012-12-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich 2012-12-19 10:40:30 UTC --- Ok, long standing issue caused by the transition to g++ as bootstrap compiler. Here's the status for gcc-4.7.3 rev. 194494 on x86_64-w64-mingw32: /SCRATCH/tmp.wOrMZOydvQ/gcc

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

2012-12-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich 2012-12-19 10:50:15 UTC --- Last Chunk is not part of the patch, it's for a different issue, see PR55707.

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

2012-12-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich 2012-12-19 10:55:55 UTC --- Here's the status for gcc-4.8.0 rev. 194494 on x86_64-w64-mingw32: g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrit

[Bug bootstrap/55741] New: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc

2012-12-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Bootstrap fails in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc: # error "No sleep function known for this t

[Bug bootstrap/55707] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails in gcc/graphite-dependences.c error cast loses precision

2013-01-03 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich 2013-01-03 12:15:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Please post patch to ML. That is a trivial one. > Btw do you have made already paper-work with FSF? Patch posted to the ML http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

2013-01-03 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Emrich 2013-01-03 13:28:51 UTC --- Patch posted to the ML http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00114.html

[Bug jit/69490] jit testsuite failures (segmentation fault) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2016-01-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69490 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 26.01.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > Am 26.01.2016 um 15:50 schrieb dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=694

[Bug jit/69490] jit testsuite failures (segmentation fault) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2016-01-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69490 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/68446] [6 Regression] jit testsuite failures seen inside dwarf2out.c:gen_producer_string

2016-01-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

2016-01-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 37489 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37489&action=edit proposed patch * gnat.dg/sso/*.adb: Robustify dg-output directives.

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

2016-01-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- I'm testing the proposed patch on x86_64-w64-mingw32 and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

[Bug bootstrap/69513] New: LTO bootstrap fails with bootstrap-profiled during linking gnat1 in stagefeedback

2016-01-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- trunk revison 232867 binutils-2.26 /opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.kZaQUWUv9N/gcc-6.0.0-test/gcc-6.0.0-test/./prev-gcc/xg

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

2016-01-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich --- I tested the new version of the proposed patch. Now the tests all pass on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and x86_64-w64-mingw32. Eric, please submit to mainline.

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

2016-01-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 37491 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37491&action=edit proposed patch, new version * gnat.dg/sso/*.adb: Robustify dg-output directives. Changed conv1.adb again. The

[Bug bootstrap/69513] LTO bootstrap fails with bootstrap-profiled during linking gnat1 in stagefeedback

2016-03-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69513 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug bootstrap/81470] New: [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-07-17 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- With current trunk revision 250281 I get several bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada on x86_64-w64-mingw bootstrap with msys2. That

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-07-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/81965] New: [8 Regression] ICE in stage 2 compiler while configuring libgcc in stage 2, during GIMPLE pass: cfg

2017-08-24 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- gcc version 8.0.0 20170824 (experimental) [trunk revision 251326] (GCC) ICE in stage 2 compiler

[Bug bootstrap/81965] [8 Regression] ICE in stage 2 compiler while configuring libgcc in stage 2, during GIMPLE pass: cfg

2017-08-24 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81965 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Just a wild guess... does > > Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c > === > --- gcc/dwarf2out.c (revision 2

[Bug bootstrap/81965] [8 Regression] ICE in stage 2 compiler while configuring libgcc in stage 2, during GIMPLE pass: cfg

2017-08-24 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81965 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > Just a wild guess... does > > > > Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c > > ===

[Bug bootstrap/81965] [8 Regression] ICE in stage 2 compiler while configuring libgcc in stage 2, during GIMPLE pass: cfg

2017-08-24 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81965 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/82006] New: [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2017-08-28 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- Recently I get a lot of tcl error in the testsuite on trunk. for example: ERROR: tcl error sourcing /opt/devel/gnu

[Bug testsuite/82006] [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2017-08-29 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Seems to work fine here (dejagnu 1.4.4) In my case dejagnu 1.4.4 shows the same issue. I try to find out what's causing this issue. At the moment there are ev

[Bug testsuite/82006] [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2017-08-29 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > In case it matters I have tcl 8.6.1 and 8.6.3. I tried several different veriosn of tcl, expect an dejagnu. AFAIS the issue is unrelated to a specific version o

[Bug bootstrap/78880] New: [7 Regression] Revision 243196 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2016-12-21 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- Revision 243196 breaks native bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32 using --with-sysroot to point gcc to the mingw-w64 runtime. This

[Bug bootstrap/78880] [7 Regression] Revision 243196 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2017-01-07 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #2) > When using a sysroot STARTFILE_PREFIX is supposed to be relative to the > sysroot variable -- meaning the mingw port is no longer going to be looking > in /mingw

[Bug libfortran/79127] New: [7 Regression] Error: invalid register for .seh_savexmm in matmul_i4.c

2017-01-18 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
Priority: P3 Component: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- Recently trunk fails to build libgfortran on x86_64-w64-mingw32. /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile /opt/devel

[Bug target/79127] [7 Regression] Error: invalid register for .seh_savexmm in matmul_i4.c

2017-01-18 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79127 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 40534 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40534&action=edit assembly Here's the assembly. AFAICS the issue is in matmul_i4_avx512f.

[Bug target/79127] [7 Regression] Error: invalid register for .seh_savexmm in matmul_i4.c

2017-01-18 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79127 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1) > Looks like the binutils on mingw is not able to handle AVX. > > I have to confess that I don't know a lot about binutil > versions. Can you post the version tha

[Bug target/79127] [7 Regression] Error: invalid register for .seh_savexmm in matmul_i4.c

2017-01-18 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79127 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #5) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1) > > Looks like the binutils on mingw is not able to handle AVX. > > > > I have to confess that I don't know a lot abo

[Bug target/79127] [7 Regression] Error: invalid register for .seh_savexmm in matmul_i4.c

2017-01-18 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79127 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Perhaps the HAVE_AVX512F configure test is too simple for the SEH purposes. > I've tried: > typedef double __m512d __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (64)))

[Bug target/79127] [7 Regression] Error: invalid register for .seh_savexmm in matmul_i4.c

2017-01-18 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79127 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Note I have no access to any kind of Windows, so can just bootstrap/regtest > it on Linux to make sure it hasn't regressed anything there. I will test the patc

[Bug target/79127] [7 Regression] Error: invalid register for .seh_savexmm in matmul_i4.c

2017-01-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79127 --- Comment #13 from Rainer Emrich --- The proposed patch indeed fixes the issue on x86_64-w64-mingw32, libgfortran builds again. The results of a complete testsuite run can be found here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-01/msg01881.

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-24 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Is this still a problem? At least on x86_64-linux many people have done > many successful bootstraps with ada since then. I will test next week, when I find the

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich --- Unfortunately the issue persists. There are even more failures. Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/ada/ali-util.o differs gcc/ada/ali.o differs gcc/ada/bindgen.o differs gcc/ada/b_gna

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5) > r247301 is the switch to native exceptions for the compiler proper and we > know that this works on 64-bit Windows. How do you configure the compiler? ../../../

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7) > And what's the output of 'gcc -v' for the base compiler? Same gcc without ada: $ /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-8

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-30 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Olivier Hainque from comment #11) > Comment on attachment 42747 [details] > don't emit .cfi_personality/.cfi_lsda for !dwarf2 eh > > >diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c > >index 3d6

[Bug testsuite/82006] [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected

2017-12-05 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Any progress on this? No, I'm under heavy workload at the moment. I don't see how to debug this. I will bisect to find the commit which causes the issue, hopeful

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-12-06 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #13 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #12) > (In reply to Olivier Hainque from comment #11) > > Comment on attachment 42747 [details] > > don't emit .cfi_personality/.cfi_lsda for !dwarf2 eh > > > > >diff

  1   2   >