https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101803
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102163
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10 Regression]
|std:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101344
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 98486, which changed state.
Bug 98486 Summary: Variable template specialization doesn't account for
primary's constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102412
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95567
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60009
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99904
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 99904, which changed state.
Bug 99904 Summary: [concepts] ICE: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:13056
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99904
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Bug 67898 depends on bug 61355, which changed state.
Bug 61355 Summary: gcc doesn't normalize type in non-type template parameters
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102654
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102643
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102643
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102535
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102691
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102283
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102283
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Fedor Chelnokov from comment #0 in PR102691)
> This code is valid:
> ```
> struct Foo {};
> struct Bar {};
>
> constexpr int Baz(const Foo&) { return 0; }
> constexpr int Baz(Bar&&) { return 1;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101483
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101589
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101599
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100606
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100387
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100475
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100475
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|11.2
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100387
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #7)
> Fixed for GCC 10.4/11.3/12
For the record this fix is also present in 11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100479
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93884
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100070
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100187
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100237
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100287
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > We might first need to implement P2231 (for constexpr optional) before this
> > function can be properly conste
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99008
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94310
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92911
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
*** Bug 92911 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Looks like after r12-4517 the test now compiles successfully on m68k according
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-October/729689.html
Though the test presumably still fails on the 11 br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102358
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102876
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||4131
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102933
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102780
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102999
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cantonios at google dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102975
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102975
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Hmm, this is interesting:
> > template concept Never = false;
> > template concept C = Never;
> > void f() {
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.5.0
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107378
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 102600, which changed state.
Bug 102600 Summary: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass evrp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 102600, which changed state.
Bug 102600 Summary: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass evrp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852
Bug 106852 depends on bug 106848, which changed state.
Bug 106848 Summary: ICE when compiling module interface file with -g: error:
type variant differs by TYPE_MAX_VALUE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106848
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106848
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 106848, which changed state.
Bug 106848 Summary: ICE when compiling module interface file with -g: error:
type variant differs by TYPE_MAX_VALUE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106848
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107417
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107429
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwjagersma at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107439
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107439
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
So the question is if in C++20 mode we're allowed to reject ahead of time a
call to an unknown template-id with dependent template arguments and no
function arguments (as in the original testcase):
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107471
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107470
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96830
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107468
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107468
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka ---
Might be good to let upstream know about these issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 98895, which changed state.
Bug 98895 Summary: C++ module generates too many dead code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98895
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98895
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 103600, which changed state.
Bug 103600 Summary: Cannot use typeid result in constant expressions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103600
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 93413, which changed state.
Bug 93413 Summary: Defaulted constexpr Destructor not being found during
constant evaluation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98712
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102490
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 89074, which changed state.
Bug 89074 Summary: valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107514
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107461
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Summary|ambiguity error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107638
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105611
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98822
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||cwg2596
Summary|Rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107701
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107701
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107740
Bug ID: 107740
Summary: if-to-switch conversion happens for simple predicate
function when compiled with gcc but not with g++
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107864
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107773
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107773
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107864
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107542
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107542
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107539
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107539
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103081
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103081
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107417
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka
1101 - 1200 of 2686 matches
Mail list logo