[Bug rtl-optimization/27114] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Bug under optimization. (cast to reference)

2006-04-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-11 10:03 --- -O2 -fno-inline works (tested on x86-64). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27114

[Bug other/27156] New: SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-04-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
agmk dot net GCC build triplet: i486-linux GCC host triplet: i486-linux GCC target triplet: i486-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27156

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-04-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-14 09:36 --- Created an attachment (id=11265) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11265&action=view) preprocessed source (compiled with stlport-5.0.2) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27156

[Bug rtl-optimization/20586] bootstrap comparision fails with -funroll-loops.

2006-04-16 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-16 20:43 --- gcc-4.1.1 (rev. 112984) boostraped sucessfully on my box with `-march=x86-64 -O2 -funroll-loops` now :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20586

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-04-19 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-19 08:12 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well this works with just compiling like: > g++ -O2 -pthread t.ii > > With 4.1.0 (4.1.0 20051026). > Yes, it works with libstdcxx but the testcase uses STLport-5.0.2. -- htt

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-04-19 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-19 08:33 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Are you sure that you are not mixing operator new and deletes up so the > stlport's operator delete is being called on memory allocated from > operator new from libstdc++? STLport u

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-04-19 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #6 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-19 08:38 --- It works also with 4.1.x -fstrict-aliasing -fno-inline. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27156

[Bug c++/27257] Error integer compare in g++ 4.1.0

2006-04-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-22 08:23 --- (In reply to comment #0) > int b = 0X8000; > if ((b - 10) < 0) b - 10 is 0xff(...)7ff6 and this is an integer overflow. [ cite: c++ standard / $5.5 ] if during the evaluation of an expre

[Bug other/27261] New: -ftrapv doesn't work.

2006-04-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
mponent: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86-64-linux GCC host triplet: x86-64-linux GCC target triplet: x86-64-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27261

[Bug other/27261] -ftrapv doesn't work.

2006-04-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-22 14:07 --- of course command line shoud be: $ g++ signed_overflow_3.cpp -ftrapv ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27261

[Bug target/27277] standard i387 constant loading insns (fldz, fld1) are not generated anymore

2006-04-24 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-04-24 08:50 --- PR26915 seems to be related to this bug. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/17390] missing floating point compare optimization

2006-05-01 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-01 08:05 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Created an attachment (id=10666) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10666&action=view) [edit] > patch to SVN GCC: (GNU) 4.2.0 20060117 (experimental) this patch IC

[Bug rtl-optimization/20586] bootstrap comparision fails with -funroll-loops.

2006-05-01 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #7 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-01 10:31 --- 4.1.1-20060501 (rev. 113407) fails again. [ i686 ] ./c-format.o differs ./combine.o differs ./global.o differs ./i386.o differs ./ipa-cp.o differs ./loop.o differs ./modulo-sched.o differs ./reg-stack.o differs

[Bug target/26915] missed optimization / returning -1.0

2006-05-01 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-01 10:41 --- (In reply to comment #1) > ...and the current 4.2.0 ICEs on this testcase: > > $ ./xgcc -B. 26915.c -m32 -march=i686 > 26915.c: In function ‘minus1’: > 26915.c:1: error: bb_for_stmt (stmt) is set to a wr

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-05-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #8 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-03 09:02 --- Created an attachment (id=11364) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11364&action=view) full 32-bit testcase. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-05-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #9 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-03 09:05 --- (In reply to comment #7) > The testcase works for me as I don't have the STLport installed (and what is > in > this bug is not enough to reproduce the bug). > so, try latest testcase. $ make g++ test

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-05-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-03 09:19 --- Created an attachment (id=11365) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11365&action=view) source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27156

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-05-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #11 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-03 09:22 --- also fails on 64-bit system. $ g++ testDrv.cpp -o testDrv -pthread -O2 \ -I/usr/include/stlport -nodefaultlibs -lstlport -lc $ ./testDrv *** glibc detected *** ./testDrv: munmap_chunk

[Bug other/27417] New: wrong code or aliasing violation with missed diagnostic?

2006-05-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: i486-linux GCC host triplet: i486-linux GCC target triplet: i486-linux http

[Bug other/27417] wrong code or aliasing violation with missed diagnostic?

2006-05-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-04 12:08 --- (In reply to comment #1) > This missed diagnostic is known, as enabling a warning here would cause too > much "false" positives. but what about -Wstrict-aliasing=2? it doesn't report anything, so how

[Bug driver/27419] '-static' for 'gcc libraries' only?

2006-05-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-04 13:15 --- (In reply to comment #0) > Hi! > > I would be interested in having the "gcc libraries" statically linked to my > binary, but still use one shared-object (a commercial library for which no > static

[Bug driver/7516] Ambiguous driver behaviour with "-shared -static" cmd line options combination

2006-05-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-04 13:21 --- (In reply to comment #0) > $ ldd ./libfoo.so > /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 => /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 (0x40003000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x40015000) > /lib/ld-lin

[Bug bootstrap/25672] cross build's libgcc picks up CFLAGS

2006-05-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #6 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-04 16:15 --- nobody cares about this bad flags pickup? (In reply to comment #5) > hmm, CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET picks up CFLAGS. > > --- gcc-4.1-20060106/Makefile.in.orig 2005-12-15 15:02:02.0 +0100 > +++ gcc-4.1-20060106

[Bug middle-end/27414] IA64 bootstrap comparison failure, stage 2 -> 3

2006-05-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-04 16:18 --- (In reply to comment #0) > Hi, > > I just pulled from SVN and tried to build for IA64, and it fails with > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs > Bootstrap comparison failure!

[Bug bootstrap/25715] lack of gcc target headers inclusion.

2006-05-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-05 11:29 --- crossbuild of 4.1.1-20060504 (rev. 113515) for i686->ppc64 and x86-64->ppc64 works to me now. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/25672] cross build's libgcc picks up CFLAGS

2006-05-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #8 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-05 11:52 --- patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00204.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672

[Bug other/27417] wrong code or aliasing violation with missed diagnostic?

2006-05-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-05 15:10 --- (In reply to comment #3) > You cannot. Though you can try extending c-common.c:strict_aliasing_warning > and > cp/typeck.c:build_reinterpret_cast_1 to warn in this case. sorry, but i don't know compiler i

[Bug c++/27533] wrong result after reinterpret_cast from float* to int*

2006-05-10 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-10 14:51 --- you're violating the aliasing rules, so use -fno-strict-aliasing option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27533

[Bug c++/27533] wrong result after reinterpret_cast from float* to int*

2006-05-10 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-10 15:26 --- (In reply to comment #0) > The code > > inline int almost_equal(float a, float b, int maxUlps = 16) { > int intDiff = *(reinterpret_cast(&a)) - > *(reinterpret_cast(&b));

[Bug other/27156] SIGSEGV in operator delete() / wrong-code?

2006-05-10 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #12 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-10 22:36 --- following reduced testcase works with libstdc++ and segv with stlport. #include #include struct A { }; int main() { std::list< A* > l; std::vector< A* > v( l.end(), l.end() ); re

[Bug other/27567] New: __builtin_memcpy generates redundant stores/moves.

2006-05-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
nent: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86-*-linux GCC host triplet: x86-*-linux GCC target triplet: x86-*-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27567

[Bug other/27654] New: bogus/missed diagnostic at -Os.

2006-05-18 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: i486-linux GCC host triplet: i486-linux GCC target triplet: i486-linux http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug other/27654] bogous/missed diagnostic at -Os.

2006-05-18 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-18 10:12 --- #include bool foo( bool b1, bool b2 ) { std::string what; std::size_t size = what.size(); if ( b1 && size ) { if ( b2 ) ret

[Bug other/27654] bogous/missed diagnostic at -Os.

2006-05-18 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-18 10:14 --- 3.3.6 doesn't report about 'control reaches...'. 4.0 and 4.2 not tested. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27654

[Bug bootstrap/27918] New: stage2 failed: broken linking / Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 62)

2006-06-06 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux GCC target triplet

[Bug inline-asm/23399] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:387

2006-06-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-12 19:15 --- still ice. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|2.95 3.0.4 3.2.2 4.0.0

[Bug bootstrap/25672] cross build's libgcc picks up CFLAGS

2006-06-17 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #9 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-17 19:24 --- patch posted on gcc-patches over month ago. still no response. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672

[Bug target/28150] New: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:394

2006-06-24 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
load.c:394 Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: ppc-linux GCC host tr

[Bug target/28150] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:394

2006-06-24 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-24 09:23 --- Created an attachment (id=11740) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11740&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28150

[Bug target/28150] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:394

2006-06-25 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-25 08:47 --- (In reply to comment #2) > How did you configure GCC becase having TFmode there sounds like you > configured > to have 128bit long double to be default. > $ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/ppc-pld-linux

[Bug c++/26671] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Missing "warning: reference to local variable returned"

2006-06-28 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-28 08:56 --- following testcase doesn't generate warning in 4.1.2svn. 3.3.6 works fine. #include std::string const& foo() { std::string tab[ 1 ] = { std::string( "text" ) }; int const idx = 0;

[Bug other/28187] New: '-O2 -fwrapv' exhausts memory.

2006-06-28 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: 486, powerpc GCC host triplet: 486

[Bug other/28187] '-O2 -fwrapv' exhausts memory.

2006-06-28 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-28 12:46 --- Created an attachment (id=11768) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11768&action=view) i486 precompiled testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28187

[Bug target/28150] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:394

2006-06-29 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-29 09:36 --- this bug blocks portable.net developing. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/25864] Enable IBM long double format in 32-bit PowerPC Linux

2006-06-29 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #17 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-29 18:33 --- PR28150 seems to be related. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25864

[Bug target/28150] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:394

2006-06-29 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-29 19:27 --- reduced testcase: void foo( void* dst, void* src, int x ) { long double nativeFloat; void *ptr; if (x) { nativeFloat = (long double)(*((float*)src)); ptr

[Bug other/28210] New: ICE in is_gimple_min_invariant at -O1.

2006-06-30 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
ad in main () -- Summary: ICE in is_gimple_min_invariant at -O1. Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto a

[Bug other/28210] ICE in is_gimple_min_invariant at -O1.

2006-06-30 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-30 13:34 --- Created an attachment (id=11785) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11785&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28210

[Bug ada/21952] Many attribute directive ignored warnings during Alpha bootstrap

2006-07-02 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #11 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-02 14:40 --- 4.1.2svn still broken. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21952

[Bug libgcj/24403] --enable-java-awt=qt fails to build

2006-07-02 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #7 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-03 00:08 --- Created an attachment (id=11803) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11803&action=view) updated build hack for mainline. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24403

[Bug other/28230] New: ICE during profiled bootstrap.

2006-07-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28230

[Bug other/28230] ICE during profiled bootstrap.

2006-07-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-03 11:24 --- without profiling boostrap fails too. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0074c419 in lshift_significand (r=0xc97980, a=0xc97980, n=63) at ../../gcc/real.c:254 254 r

[Bug c++/20681] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches

2006-07-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #15 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-03 15:27 --- one more valid code rejected by 4.1/4.2: typedef enum { foo, bar } e; int zoo( e __e ) { switch ( __e ) { case foo: return -1; case bar: return +1; } } $ x86_64-gnu

[Bug c++/20681] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches

2006-07-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #16 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-03 15:30 --- (In reply to comment #15) > one more valid code rejected by 4.1/4.2: > > typedef enum { foo, bar } e; > int zoo( e __e ) > { > switch ( __e ) > { >

[Bug c++/28236] New: wrong "control reaches" warning with enums.

2006-07-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
ary: wrong "control reaches" warning with enums. Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agm

[Bug c++/20681] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches

2006-07-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #18 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-03 16:55 --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > ohh, 3.3.6 also fails. > > That is a different issue and really should be filed in a different bug. The > issue there is C++'s enums are onl

[Bug c++/28236] wrong "control reaches" warning with enums.

2006-07-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-03 17:00 --- zoo (__e) { int D.1616; : switch (__e) { case 0: goto ; case 1: goto ; default : goto ; < } :; D.1616 = -1; goto (); :; return; < problem. :; D.16

[Bug other/28230] ICE during profiled bootstrap.

2006-07-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-04 21:16 --- works fine with BOOT_CFLAGS="-01" && STAGE1_CFLAGS="-O0". with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2" ices as above. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What

[Bug other/28264] New: broken gcc/config/soft-fp build.

2006-07-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
Summary: broken gcc/config/soft-fp build. Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk

[Bug other/28264] broken gcc/config/soft-fp build.

2006-07-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-05 08:19 --- ohhh, now I see what's wrong. Out of Memory: Killed process 18248 (cc1). the PPC970FX box has 1GB ram + 1GB swap. i'll re-run build and try to reproduce this memory-hog. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug other/28264] broken gcc/config/soft-fp build.

2006-07-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-05 15:45 --- ok, my fault.(In reply to comment #4) > ohhh, now I see what's wrong. > > Out of Memory: Killed process 18248 (cc1). > > the PPC970FX box has 1GB ram + 1GB swap. > i'll re-run build and try

[Bug other/28272] New: ICE during bootstrap (possible wrong code at -O2).

2006-07-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: powerpc-linux GCC host triplet: powerpc-linux GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux http

[Bug other/28264] broken gcc/config/soft-fp build.

2006-07-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #6 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-05 15:48 --- (In reply to comment #5) > with -O2 ./cc1 ICEs. for more details see PR28272 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28264

[Bug other/28272] ICE during bootstrap (possible wrong code at -O2).

2006-07-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-05 15:53 --- Created an attachment (id=11834) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11834&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28272

[Bug other/28272] ICE during bootstrap (possible wrong code at -O2).

2006-07-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-05 17:06 --- (In reply to comment #2) > When you file a bug about bootstrap failure, can you the following > information: > How you configured? Reading specs from ./specs Target: ppc-pld-linux Configured with: ../configure

[Bug tree-optimization/28210] ICE in is_gimple_min_invariant at -O1.

2006-07-16 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-16 20:27 --- it works for me with 4.1.2 revision 115366. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28210

[Bug other/38108] New: broken c++ diagnostics?

2008-11-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
ics? Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38108

[Bug other/38108] broken c++ diagnostics?

2008-11-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-11-13 21:22 --- Created an attachment (id=1) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1&action=view) testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38108

[Bug other/38108] broken c++ diagnostics?

2008-11-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-11-13 22:06 --- arghh, this hell of macros in boost is broken. sorry for the noise. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/28811] --with-pic vs static libraries and libstdc++

2008-11-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #13 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-11-14 00:32 --- (In reply to comment #10) > If no and --with-pic builds everything twice and it is possible to compile > the *.o's intended for libstdc++.so with -DSHARED, i thought about something like this: $ cat ma

[Bug java/38298] New: libjava link failures.

2008-11-27 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38298

[Bug target/38320] New: missed movd opcode (32bits mm -> r/m32).

2008-11-29 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
missed movd opcode (32bits mm -> r/m32). Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC ta

[Bug target/38320] missed movd opcode (32bits mm -> r/m32).

2008-11-30 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-11-30 10:23 --- (In reply to comment #1) > You need -mtune=core to generate "movd %xmm0, %rax". Gcc 4.4 works. is movd faster only on core2 architecture? and what about 32-bits? $ /opt/gcc44/bin/gcc movd.c -O2 -S -march=co

[Bug other/38388] New: parallel install failures in install-{libiberty,gnatlib}

2008-12-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38388

[Bug other/38388] parallel install failures in install-{libiberty,gnatlib}

2008-12-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-03 18:34 --- Created an attachment (id=16820) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16820&action=view) log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38388

[Bug other/38388] parallel install failures in install-{libiberty,gnatlib}

2008-12-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-03 18:34 --- Created an attachment (id=16821) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16821&action=view) log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38388

[Bug other/38388] parallel install failures in install-{libiberty,gnatlib}

2008-12-03 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-03 18:35 --- this is a trunk/r142396 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38388

[Bug middle-end/38503] [4.4 regression] warnings from -isystem headers strikes back.

2008-12-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-12 11:37 --- Created an attachment (id=16897) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16897&action=view) testcase. to reproduce bug you also need the boost-1.37.0 headers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug middle-end/38503] New: [4.4 regression] warnings from -isystem headers strikes back.

2008-12-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38503

[Bug c++/28786] No way set visibility of typeinfo without setting VTT and vtable similarly

2008-12-23 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-23 11:54 --- (In reply to comment #0) > There is currently no way to set the visibility of the typeinfo, except by > setting the visibility of the VTT and vtable. isn't -fvisibility-ms-compat (from recent gcc) eno

[Bug c++/38610] New: local objects not hidden with -fvisibility=hidden.

2008-12-23 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
h -fvisibility=hidden. Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC target triplet: x8

[Bug libgcj/38298] libjava link failures.

2008-12-24 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-24 12:57 --- passing -Wl,--as-needed to LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET causing this failure. 4.3 works fine with --as-needed. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/38298] libjava link failures.

2008-12-24 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-24 17:02 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Not a GCC bug, please report this to the binutils project which controls ld. > link failure with --as-needed is not a linker bug. it's strictly related to bugs in makefiles. i

[Bug other/35857] --disable-shared doesn't install libgcc_eh.a

2008-12-29 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-29 09:32 --- (In reply to comment #1) > IIRC libgcc_eh.a is only needed for shared targets. > e.g., stlport configured with --enable-static --use-static-gcc needs static -lgcc_eh, -lgcc and -lsupc++ to self-link. it uses only

[Bug libgcj/38298] libjava link failures.

2008-12-29 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #6 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-29 09:59 --- during standard build (w/o --as-needed) the libgcj-tools.so is linked in the following way: (...) libtool: link: /home/users/pluto/rpm/BUILD/gcc-4.4-20081219/builddir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/users/pluto/rpm/BUILD

[Bug libgcj/38298] libjava link failures.

2008-12-29 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #8 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-12-29 14:28 --- Created an attachment (id=17000) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17000&action=view) full log (configure & build without --as-needed flag). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38298

[Bug c++/38764] New: bogus 'changes meaning' error?

2009-01-08 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38764

[Bug c++/38764] bogus 'changes meaning' error?

2009-01-08 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-08 12:56 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I suggest filing a problem report with Comeau. EDG accepts both in > -strict_ansi mode. > i've tested it on comeau online to verify g++ behaviour :) -- http://gcc.gn

[Bug c++/38764] bogus 'changes meaning' error?

2009-01-09 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-09 19:39 --- as mentioned, gcc is correct. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug middle-end/38503] [4.4 regression] warnings from -isystem headers strikes back.

2009-01-09 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-09 19:52 --- Created an attachment (id=17067) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17067&action=view) preprocessed testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38503

[Bug middle-end/38808] New: another warning from system headers.

2009-01-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC target triplet: i486-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38808

[Bug middle-end/38808] another warning from system headers.

2009-01-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-11 22:49 --- Created an attachment (id=17073) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17073&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38808

[Bug middle-end/38808] another warning from system headers.

2009-01-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-12 09:02 --- btw. this bug doesn't occur on x86-64. buggy vrp/array-checking? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38808

[Bug libstdc++/38477] [strict-aliasing] warning message contains compiler-generated symbols

2009-01-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #13 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-12 14:43 --- (In reply to comment #12) > This isn't really a warning from system headers: > > test.cpp:14: warning: dereferencing pointer '__x.13' does break > strict-aliasing > rules > > th

[Bug middle-end/38503] [4.4 regression] warnings from -isystem headers strikes back.

2009-01-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #6 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-12 15:01 --- Created an attachment (id=17077) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17077&action=view) full testcase (src + .ii + mkefile) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38503

[Bug middle-end/38503] [4.4 regression] warnings from -isystem headers strikes back.

2009-01-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #7 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-12 15:10 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I can't seem to compile the preprocessed source: i've attached a new full archive. $ make rm -f *.ii *.o *.s /local/devel/toolchain44/x86_64-gnu-linux/bin/x86_64-gnu-linux-g++ -c

[Bug middle-end/38503] [4.4 regression] warnings from -isystem headers strikes back.

2009-01-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-14 18:29 --- (In reply to comment #9) > I just installed a fix - can you verify if all the annoying warnigns are > gone? > Thx! > they are still there. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38503

[Bug libstdc++/38919] New: math_stubs_long_double.cc: error: redefinition of 'long double ...'

2009-01-19 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
vs. /usr/x86_64-mingw32/include/math.h Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC tar

[Bug other/38920] New: throwing ex. across dlls doesn't work.

2009-01-19 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
ent: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC target triplet: x86_64-mingw32 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38920

[Bug other/38920] throwing ex. across dlls doesn't work.

2009-01-19 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-20 02:51 --- Created an attachment (id=17149) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17149&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38920

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >